A comparative study of quality of life among the age groups of kidney transplant recipients

Muammer Cetingok, Rebecca P. Winsett, Donna Hathaway

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context-Quality of life and transplant age are 2 major concerns of professionals and researchers. Both variables are contemplated in transplant allocation decisions as a result of longer graft and patient survival and the likelihood of achieving a reasonably good quality of life for patients of all ages. Studies are warranted to understand if quality of life might serve as a moderating variable to balance question of age-and transplant allocations. Objective-To determine if there are differences in the pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of kidney transplant recipients with respect to age. Design, Participants, Setting, and Outcome Measures-This study comparatively examined the differences in pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of kidney transplant recipients in 5 age groups (18-29 years, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and older than 60). A sample of 293 patients admitted to a midsouthem US transplant center and selected on a convenience-sampling basis were included in the study. Multiple measures of quality of life were used, including the Quality of Life Index, the Adult Self-Image Scale, and the Sickness Impact Profile. Results-Both the pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of all age groups of kidney transplant recipients were similar, with the exception that the recipients in the age range of 30 to 49 years reported better posttransplant quality of life on the Sickness Impact Profile Psychosocial measure (F=2.18, P=.02). Conclusions-Quality of life outcomes do not appear to favor one age group over another, although psychosocial outcomes may warrant some additional consideration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-38
Number of pages6
JournalProgress in Transplantation
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

Age Groups
Quality of Life
Kidney
Sickness Impact Profile
Transplants
Transplant Recipients
Graft Survival
Research Personnel
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Transplantation

Cite this

A comparative study of quality of life among the age groups of kidney transplant recipients. / Cetingok, Muammer; Winsett, Rebecca P.; Hathaway, Donna.

In: Progress in Transplantation, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 33-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{db95ed45244240baad3f064066edffbf,
title = "A comparative study of quality of life among the age groups of kidney transplant recipients",
abstract = "Context-Quality of life and transplant age are 2 major concerns of professionals and researchers. Both variables are contemplated in transplant allocation decisions as a result of longer graft and patient survival and the likelihood of achieving a reasonably good quality of life for patients of all ages. Studies are warranted to understand if quality of life might serve as a moderating variable to balance question of age-and transplant allocations. Objective-To determine if there are differences in the pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of kidney transplant recipients with respect to age. Design, Participants, Setting, and Outcome Measures-This study comparatively examined the differences in pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of kidney transplant recipients in 5 age groups (18-29 years, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and older than 60). A sample of 293 patients admitted to a midsouthem US transplant center and selected on a convenience-sampling basis were included in the study. Multiple measures of quality of life were used, including the Quality of Life Index, the Adult Self-Image Scale, and the Sickness Impact Profile. Results-Both the pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of all age groups of kidney transplant recipients were similar, with the exception that the recipients in the age range of 30 to 49 years reported better posttransplant quality of life on the Sickness Impact Profile Psychosocial measure (F=2.18, P=.02). Conclusions-Quality of life outcomes do not appear to favor one age group over another, although psychosocial outcomes may warrant some additional consideration.",
author = "Muammer Cetingok and Winsett, {Rebecca P.} and Donna Hathaway",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7182/prtr.14.1.g5612w70x8331k61",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "33--38",
journal = "Progress in Transplantation",
issn = "1526-9248",
publisher = "InnoVision Communications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of quality of life among the age groups of kidney transplant recipients

AU - Cetingok, Muammer

AU - Winsett, Rebecca P.

AU - Hathaway, Donna

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Context-Quality of life and transplant age are 2 major concerns of professionals and researchers. Both variables are contemplated in transplant allocation decisions as a result of longer graft and patient survival and the likelihood of achieving a reasonably good quality of life for patients of all ages. Studies are warranted to understand if quality of life might serve as a moderating variable to balance question of age-and transplant allocations. Objective-To determine if there are differences in the pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of kidney transplant recipients with respect to age. Design, Participants, Setting, and Outcome Measures-This study comparatively examined the differences in pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of kidney transplant recipients in 5 age groups (18-29 years, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and older than 60). A sample of 293 patients admitted to a midsouthem US transplant center and selected on a convenience-sampling basis were included in the study. Multiple measures of quality of life were used, including the Quality of Life Index, the Adult Self-Image Scale, and the Sickness Impact Profile. Results-Both the pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of all age groups of kidney transplant recipients were similar, with the exception that the recipients in the age range of 30 to 49 years reported better posttransplant quality of life on the Sickness Impact Profile Psychosocial measure (F=2.18, P=.02). Conclusions-Quality of life outcomes do not appear to favor one age group over another, although psychosocial outcomes may warrant some additional consideration.

AB - Context-Quality of life and transplant age are 2 major concerns of professionals and researchers. Both variables are contemplated in transplant allocation decisions as a result of longer graft and patient survival and the likelihood of achieving a reasonably good quality of life for patients of all ages. Studies are warranted to understand if quality of life might serve as a moderating variable to balance question of age-and transplant allocations. Objective-To determine if there are differences in the pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of kidney transplant recipients with respect to age. Design, Participants, Setting, and Outcome Measures-This study comparatively examined the differences in pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of kidney transplant recipients in 5 age groups (18-29 years, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and older than 60). A sample of 293 patients admitted to a midsouthem US transplant center and selected on a convenience-sampling basis were included in the study. Multiple measures of quality of life were used, including the Quality of Life Index, the Adult Self-Image Scale, and the Sickness Impact Profile. Results-Both the pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of all age groups of kidney transplant recipients were similar, with the exception that the recipients in the age range of 30 to 49 years reported better posttransplant quality of life on the Sickness Impact Profile Psychosocial measure (F=2.18, P=.02). Conclusions-Quality of life outcomes do not appear to favor one age group over another, although psychosocial outcomes may warrant some additional consideration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642342250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642342250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7182/prtr.14.1.g5612w70x8331k61

DO - 10.7182/prtr.14.1.g5612w70x8331k61

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15077735

AN - SCOPUS:1642342250

VL - 14

SP - 33

EP - 38

JO - Progress in Transplantation

JF - Progress in Transplantation

SN - 1526-9248

IS - 1

ER -