A comparison of functional MRI and magnetoencephalography for receptive language mapping

Rebecca L. Billingsley-Marshall, Trustin Clear, W. Einar Mencl, Panagiotis G. Simos, Paul R. Swank, Disheng Men, Shirin Sarkari, Eduardo M. Castillo, Andrew Papanicolaou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) for the mapping of receptive language function. Participants performed the same language task in the two different imaging environments. MEG activation profiles showed prominent bilateral activity in superior temporal gyrus and left-lateralized activity in middle temporal gyrus. fMRI activation profiles revealed bilateral activity in prefrontal, superior temporal, middle temporal, and visual areas. Laterality quotients derived from the two modalities showed poor agreement between the two methods for commonly active regions of interest. Locations of peak activity also varied considerably within participants between the two methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)306-313
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neuroscience Methods
Volume161
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2007

Fingerprint

Magnetoencephalography
Temporal Lobe
Language
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Billingsley-Marshall, R. L., Clear, T., Mencl, W. E., Simos, P. G., Swank, P. R., Men, D., ... Papanicolaou, A. (2007). A comparison of functional MRI and magnetoencephalography for receptive language mapping. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 161(2), 306-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.020

A comparison of functional MRI and magnetoencephalography for receptive language mapping. / Billingsley-Marshall, Rebecca L.; Clear, Trustin; Mencl, W. Einar; Simos, Panagiotis G.; Swank, Paul R.; Men, Disheng; Sarkari, Shirin; Castillo, Eduardo M.; Papanicolaou, Andrew.

In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 161, No. 2, 15.04.2007, p. 306-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Billingsley-Marshall, RL, Clear, T, Mencl, WE, Simos, PG, Swank, PR, Men, D, Sarkari, S, Castillo, EM & Papanicolaou, A 2007, 'A comparison of functional MRI and magnetoencephalography for receptive language mapping', Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 306-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.020
Billingsley-Marshall, Rebecca L. ; Clear, Trustin ; Mencl, W. Einar ; Simos, Panagiotis G. ; Swank, Paul R. ; Men, Disheng ; Sarkari, Shirin ; Castillo, Eduardo M. ; Papanicolaou, Andrew. / A comparison of functional MRI and magnetoencephalography for receptive language mapping. In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2007 ; Vol. 161, No. 2. pp. 306-313.
@article{568905fc423240eea018a06db7d02022,
title = "A comparison of functional MRI and magnetoencephalography for receptive language mapping",
abstract = "We compared functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) for the mapping of receptive language function. Participants performed the same language task in the two different imaging environments. MEG activation profiles showed prominent bilateral activity in superior temporal gyrus and left-lateralized activity in middle temporal gyrus. fMRI activation profiles revealed bilateral activity in prefrontal, superior temporal, middle temporal, and visual areas. Laterality quotients derived from the two modalities showed poor agreement between the two methods for commonly active regions of interest. Locations of peak activity also varied considerably within participants between the two methods.",
author = "Billingsley-Marshall, {Rebecca L.} and Trustin Clear and Mencl, {W. Einar} and Simos, {Panagiotis G.} and Swank, {Paul R.} and Disheng Men and Shirin Sarkari and Castillo, {Eduardo M.} and Andrew Papanicolaou",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "161",
pages = "306--313",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience Methods",
issn = "0165-0270",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of functional MRI and magnetoencephalography for receptive language mapping

AU - Billingsley-Marshall, Rebecca L.

AU - Clear, Trustin

AU - Mencl, W. Einar

AU - Simos, Panagiotis G.

AU - Swank, Paul R.

AU - Men, Disheng

AU - Sarkari, Shirin

AU - Castillo, Eduardo M.

AU - Papanicolaou, Andrew

PY - 2007/4/15

Y1 - 2007/4/15

N2 - We compared functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) for the mapping of receptive language function. Participants performed the same language task in the two different imaging environments. MEG activation profiles showed prominent bilateral activity in superior temporal gyrus and left-lateralized activity in middle temporal gyrus. fMRI activation profiles revealed bilateral activity in prefrontal, superior temporal, middle temporal, and visual areas. Laterality quotients derived from the two modalities showed poor agreement between the two methods for commonly active regions of interest. Locations of peak activity also varied considerably within participants between the two methods.

AB - We compared functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) for the mapping of receptive language function. Participants performed the same language task in the two different imaging environments. MEG activation profiles showed prominent bilateral activity in superior temporal gyrus and left-lateralized activity in middle temporal gyrus. fMRI activation profiles revealed bilateral activity in prefrontal, superior temporal, middle temporal, and visual areas. Laterality quotients derived from the two modalities showed poor agreement between the two methods for commonly active regions of interest. Locations of peak activity also varied considerably within participants between the two methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947520760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947520760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.020

DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.020

M3 - Article

VL - 161

SP - 306

EP - 313

JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

SN - 0165-0270

IS - 2

ER -