A comparison of photographic and transparency-based methods for measuring wound surface area

J. W. Griffin, Elizabeth Tolley, R. E. Tooms, R. A. Reyes, Judy Clifft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose. The purposes of this study were to compare test- retest reliability of measurements obtained by the use of a photographic method and those obtained by the use of a transparency method and to compare wound surface area (WSA) measurements obtained by these two methods. Subjects. Twenty inpatients (18 male, 2 female), aged 31±16 years (X̄±SD), participated in the study. Methods. Tracings of ulcer borders generated by the photographic and transparency methods were digitized to obtain WSA measurements. To assess intrarater reliability for each method, 5 ulcers were measured on two occasions. The magnitude of WSA measurements obtained by the photographic and transparency methods was compared in 22 ulcers measured on one occasion and in 16 ulcers measured at 5-day intervals for 20 days. Results. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were high (ICC=.99) for each method, indicating reliability of measurements. The WSA measurements did not differ between photographic and transparency methods, either at one occasion or over a 20-day period. Conclusion and Discussion. We concluded that the photographic and transparency methods, as applied in this study of ulcers, provided equivalently reliable measurements and that WSA measurements obtained by the two methods were equivalent. The transparency method was more economical than the photographic method in terms of time and equipment requirements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-122
Number of pages6
JournalPhysical Therapy
Volume73
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Ulcer
Reproducibility of Results
Inpatients
Equipment and Supplies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

A comparison of photographic and transparency-based methods for measuring wound surface area. / Griffin, J. W.; Tolley, Elizabeth; Tooms, R. E.; Reyes, R. A.; Clifft, Judy.

In: Physical Therapy, Vol. 73, No. 2, 01.01.1993, p. 117-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1114391419c64ca095591cd749176d08,
title = "A comparison of photographic and transparency-based methods for measuring wound surface area",
abstract = "Background and Purpose. The purposes of this study were to compare test- retest reliability of measurements obtained by the use of a photographic method and those obtained by the use of a transparency method and to compare wound surface area (WSA) measurements obtained by these two methods. Subjects. Twenty inpatients (18 male, 2 female), aged 31±16 years (X̄±SD), participated in the study. Methods. Tracings of ulcer borders generated by the photographic and transparency methods were digitized to obtain WSA measurements. To assess intrarater reliability for each method, 5 ulcers were measured on two occasions. The magnitude of WSA measurements obtained by the photographic and transparency methods was compared in 22 ulcers measured on one occasion and in 16 ulcers measured at 5-day intervals for 20 days. Results. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were high (ICC=.99) for each method, indicating reliability of measurements. The WSA measurements did not differ between photographic and transparency methods, either at one occasion or over a 20-day period. Conclusion and Discussion. We concluded that the photographic and transparency methods, as applied in this study of ulcers, provided equivalently reliable measurements and that WSA measurements obtained by the two methods were equivalent. The transparency method was more economical than the photographic method in terms of time and equipment requirements.",
author = "Griffin, {J. W.} and Elizabeth Tolley and Tooms, {R. E.} and Reyes, {R. A.} and Judy Clifft",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ptj/73.2.117",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "117--122",
journal = "Physical Therapy",
issn = "0031-9023",
publisher = "American Physical Therapy Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of photographic and transparency-based methods for measuring wound surface area

AU - Griffin, J. W.

AU - Tolley, Elizabeth

AU - Tooms, R. E.

AU - Reyes, R. A.

AU - Clifft, Judy

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - Background and Purpose. The purposes of this study were to compare test- retest reliability of measurements obtained by the use of a photographic method and those obtained by the use of a transparency method and to compare wound surface area (WSA) measurements obtained by these two methods. Subjects. Twenty inpatients (18 male, 2 female), aged 31±16 years (X̄±SD), participated in the study. Methods. Tracings of ulcer borders generated by the photographic and transparency methods were digitized to obtain WSA measurements. To assess intrarater reliability for each method, 5 ulcers were measured on two occasions. The magnitude of WSA measurements obtained by the photographic and transparency methods was compared in 22 ulcers measured on one occasion and in 16 ulcers measured at 5-day intervals for 20 days. Results. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were high (ICC=.99) for each method, indicating reliability of measurements. The WSA measurements did not differ between photographic and transparency methods, either at one occasion or over a 20-day period. Conclusion and Discussion. We concluded that the photographic and transparency methods, as applied in this study of ulcers, provided equivalently reliable measurements and that WSA measurements obtained by the two methods were equivalent. The transparency method was more economical than the photographic method in terms of time and equipment requirements.

AB - Background and Purpose. The purposes of this study were to compare test- retest reliability of measurements obtained by the use of a photographic method and those obtained by the use of a transparency method and to compare wound surface area (WSA) measurements obtained by these two methods. Subjects. Twenty inpatients (18 male, 2 female), aged 31±16 years (X̄±SD), participated in the study. Methods. Tracings of ulcer borders generated by the photographic and transparency methods were digitized to obtain WSA measurements. To assess intrarater reliability for each method, 5 ulcers were measured on two occasions. The magnitude of WSA measurements obtained by the photographic and transparency methods was compared in 22 ulcers measured on one occasion and in 16 ulcers measured at 5-day intervals for 20 days. Results. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were high (ICC=.99) for each method, indicating reliability of measurements. The WSA measurements did not differ between photographic and transparency methods, either at one occasion or over a 20-day period. Conclusion and Discussion. We concluded that the photographic and transparency methods, as applied in this study of ulcers, provided equivalently reliable measurements and that WSA measurements obtained by the two methods were equivalent. The transparency method was more economical than the photographic method in terms of time and equipment requirements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027448275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027448275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ptj/73.2.117

DO - 10.1093/ptj/73.2.117

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 117

EP - 122

JO - Physical Therapy

JF - Physical Therapy

SN - 0031-9023

IS - 2

ER -