A comparison of three downregulation approaches for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization

Laura Detti, Daniel B. Williams, Jared C. Robins, Rose A. Maxwell, Michael A. Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy of three different GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) stimulation regimens to improve ovarian response in poor responders undergoing IVF. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Center for Reproductive Health at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center. Patient(s): Women diagnosed as poor responders who presented consecutively from January 1999 to January 2004. Intervention(s): Patients underwent three different stimulation regimens during IVF cycles: [1] stop protocol: GnRH-a 500 μg/d administered from the midluteal phase to the start of menses, then gonadotropins from day 2 of cycle, [2] microdose flare: GnRH-a 20 μg administered twice daily with gonadotropins from day 2 to the day of hCG administration, or [3] regular dose flare: gonadotropins beginning with GnRH-a on day 2 at 1 mg/d for 3 days, followed by 250 μg/d until the day of hCG administration. Main Outcome Measure(s): Ovarian response, implantation rates, clinical pregnancy and delivery rates. Result(s): Sixty-one IVF cycles were included in the study. None of the comparisons reached statistical significance; however, the microdose group demonstrated a trend toward a higher completed pregnancy rate. Conclusion(s): The microdose flare protocol for poor responders demonstrated a trend toward higher delivery rates. A larger prospective study would need to be performed to determine whether this trend leads to a significant finding in this patient population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1401-1405
Number of pages5
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume84
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fertilization in Vitro
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
Down-Regulation
Gonadotropins
Pregnancy Rate
Menstruation
Reproductive Health
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

A comparison of three downregulation approaches for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. / Detti, Laura; Williams, Daniel B.; Robins, Jared C.; Maxwell, Rose A.; Thomas, Michael A.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 84, No. 5, 01.11.2005, p. 1401-1405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Detti, Laura ; Williams, Daniel B. ; Robins, Jared C. ; Maxwell, Rose A. ; Thomas, Michael A. / A comparison of three downregulation approaches for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. In: Fertility and Sterility. 2005 ; Vol. 84, No. 5. pp. 1401-1405.
@article{e10239e68e684944a7ad22c6fbad17d0,
title = "A comparison of three downregulation approaches for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the efficacy of three different GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) stimulation regimens to improve ovarian response in poor responders undergoing IVF. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Center for Reproductive Health at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center. Patient(s): Women diagnosed as poor responders who presented consecutively from January 1999 to January 2004. Intervention(s): Patients underwent three different stimulation regimens during IVF cycles: [1] stop protocol: GnRH-a 500 μg/d administered from the midluteal phase to the start of menses, then gonadotropins from day 2 of cycle, [2] microdose flare: GnRH-a 20 μg administered twice daily with gonadotropins from day 2 to the day of hCG administration, or [3] regular dose flare: gonadotropins beginning with GnRH-a on day 2 at 1 mg/d for 3 days, followed by 250 μg/d until the day of hCG administration. Main Outcome Measure(s): Ovarian response, implantation rates, clinical pregnancy and delivery rates. Result(s): Sixty-one IVF cycles were included in the study. None of the comparisons reached statistical significance; however, the microdose group demonstrated a trend toward a higher completed pregnancy rate. Conclusion(s): The microdose flare protocol for poor responders demonstrated a trend toward higher delivery rates. A larger prospective study would need to be performed to determine whether this trend leads to a significant finding in this patient population.",
author = "Laura Detti and Williams, {Daniel B.} and Robins, {Jared C.} and Maxwell, {Rose A.} and Thomas, {Michael A.}",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.053",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "1401--1405",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of three downregulation approaches for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization

AU - Detti, Laura

AU - Williams, Daniel B.

AU - Robins, Jared C.

AU - Maxwell, Rose A.

AU - Thomas, Michael A.

PY - 2005/11/1

Y1 - 2005/11/1

N2 - Objective: To assess the efficacy of three different GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) stimulation regimens to improve ovarian response in poor responders undergoing IVF. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Center for Reproductive Health at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center. Patient(s): Women diagnosed as poor responders who presented consecutively from January 1999 to January 2004. Intervention(s): Patients underwent three different stimulation regimens during IVF cycles: [1] stop protocol: GnRH-a 500 μg/d administered from the midluteal phase to the start of menses, then gonadotropins from day 2 of cycle, [2] microdose flare: GnRH-a 20 μg administered twice daily with gonadotropins from day 2 to the day of hCG administration, or [3] regular dose flare: gonadotropins beginning with GnRH-a on day 2 at 1 mg/d for 3 days, followed by 250 μg/d until the day of hCG administration. Main Outcome Measure(s): Ovarian response, implantation rates, clinical pregnancy and delivery rates. Result(s): Sixty-one IVF cycles were included in the study. None of the comparisons reached statistical significance; however, the microdose group demonstrated a trend toward a higher completed pregnancy rate. Conclusion(s): The microdose flare protocol for poor responders demonstrated a trend toward higher delivery rates. A larger prospective study would need to be performed to determine whether this trend leads to a significant finding in this patient population.

AB - Objective: To assess the efficacy of three different GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) stimulation regimens to improve ovarian response in poor responders undergoing IVF. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Center for Reproductive Health at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center. Patient(s): Women diagnosed as poor responders who presented consecutively from January 1999 to January 2004. Intervention(s): Patients underwent three different stimulation regimens during IVF cycles: [1] stop protocol: GnRH-a 500 μg/d administered from the midluteal phase to the start of menses, then gonadotropins from day 2 of cycle, [2] microdose flare: GnRH-a 20 μg administered twice daily with gonadotropins from day 2 to the day of hCG administration, or [3] regular dose flare: gonadotropins beginning with GnRH-a on day 2 at 1 mg/d for 3 days, followed by 250 μg/d until the day of hCG administration. Main Outcome Measure(s): Ovarian response, implantation rates, clinical pregnancy and delivery rates. Result(s): Sixty-one IVF cycles were included in the study. None of the comparisons reached statistical significance; however, the microdose group demonstrated a trend toward a higher completed pregnancy rate. Conclusion(s): The microdose flare protocol for poor responders demonstrated a trend toward higher delivery rates. A larger prospective study would need to be performed to determine whether this trend leads to a significant finding in this patient population.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27644484758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27644484758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.053

DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.053

M3 - Article

C2 - 16275235

AN - SCOPUS:27644484758

VL - 84

SP - 1401

EP - 1405

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 5

ER -