A critical appraisal of and recommendations for faculty development

B. Joseph Guglielmo, David J. Edwards, Andrea Franks, Cynthia A. Naughton, Kristine S. Schonder, Pamela L. Stamm, Phillip Thornton, Nicholas G. Popovich

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 2009-2010 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Council of Faculties Faculty Affairs Committee reviewed published literature assessing the scope and outcomes of faculty development for tenure and promotion. Relevant articles were identified via a PubMed search, review of pharmacy education journals, and identification of position papers from major healthcare professions academic organizations. While programs intended to enhance faculty development were described by some healthcare professions, relatively little specific to pharmacy has been published and none of the healthcare professions have adequately evaluated the impact of various faculty-development programs on associated outcomes. The paucity of published information strongly suggests a lack of outcomes-oriented faculty-development programs in colleges and schools of pharmacy. Substantial steps are required toward the development and scholarly evaluation of faculty-development programs. As these programs are developed and assessed, evaluations must encompass all faculty subgroups, including tenure- and nontenure track faculty members, volunteer faculty members, women, and underrepresented minorities. This paper proposes AACP, college and school, and department-level recommendations intended to ensure faculty success in achieving tenure and promotion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education
Volume75
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Pharmacy Schools
Delivery of Health Care
profession
Pharmacy Education
promotion
PubMed
Volunteers
evaluation
school
minority
lack
education

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

Guglielmo, B. J., Edwards, D. J., Franks, A., Naughton, C. A., Schonder, K. S., Stamm, P. L., ... Popovich, N. G. (2011). A critical appraisal of and recommendations for faculty development. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 75(6). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe756122

A critical appraisal of and recommendations for faculty development. / Guglielmo, B. Joseph; Edwards, David J.; Franks, Andrea; Naughton, Cynthia A.; Schonder, Kristine S.; Stamm, Pamela L.; Thornton, Phillip; Popovich, Nicholas G.

In: American journal of pharmaceutical education, Vol. 75, No. 6, 01.01.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Guglielmo, BJ, Edwards, DJ, Franks, A, Naughton, CA, Schonder, KS, Stamm, PL, Thornton, P & Popovich, NG 2011, 'A critical appraisal of and recommendations for faculty development', American journal of pharmaceutical education, vol. 75, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe756122
Guglielmo, B. Joseph ; Edwards, David J. ; Franks, Andrea ; Naughton, Cynthia A. ; Schonder, Kristine S. ; Stamm, Pamela L. ; Thornton, Phillip ; Popovich, Nicholas G. / A critical appraisal of and recommendations for faculty development. In: American journal of pharmaceutical education. 2011 ; Vol. 75, No. 6.
@article{d9cf454e0af24bb4b47ba422218451f5,
title = "A critical appraisal of and recommendations for faculty development",
abstract = "The 2009-2010 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Council of Faculties Faculty Affairs Committee reviewed published literature assessing the scope and outcomes of faculty development for tenure and promotion. Relevant articles were identified via a PubMed search, review of pharmacy education journals, and identification of position papers from major healthcare professions academic organizations. While programs intended to enhance faculty development were described by some healthcare professions, relatively little specific to pharmacy has been published and none of the healthcare professions have adequately evaluated the impact of various faculty-development programs on associated outcomes. The paucity of published information strongly suggests a lack of outcomes-oriented faculty-development programs in colleges and schools of pharmacy. Substantial steps are required toward the development and scholarly evaluation of faculty-development programs. As these programs are developed and assessed, evaluations must encompass all faculty subgroups, including tenure- and nontenure track faculty members, volunteer faculty members, women, and underrepresented minorities. This paper proposes AACP, college and school, and department-level recommendations intended to ensure faculty success in achieving tenure and promotion.",
author = "Guglielmo, {B. Joseph} and Edwards, {David J.} and Andrea Franks and Naughton, {Cynthia A.} and Schonder, {Kristine S.} and Stamm, {Pamela L.} and Phillip Thornton and Popovich, {Nicholas G.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5688/ajpe756122",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
journal = "American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education",
issn = "0002-9459",
publisher = "American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical appraisal of and recommendations for faculty development

AU - Guglielmo, B. Joseph

AU - Edwards, David J.

AU - Franks, Andrea

AU - Naughton, Cynthia A.

AU - Schonder, Kristine S.

AU - Stamm, Pamela L.

AU - Thornton, Phillip

AU - Popovich, Nicholas G.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - The 2009-2010 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Council of Faculties Faculty Affairs Committee reviewed published literature assessing the scope and outcomes of faculty development for tenure and promotion. Relevant articles were identified via a PubMed search, review of pharmacy education journals, and identification of position papers from major healthcare professions academic organizations. While programs intended to enhance faculty development were described by some healthcare professions, relatively little specific to pharmacy has been published and none of the healthcare professions have adequately evaluated the impact of various faculty-development programs on associated outcomes. The paucity of published information strongly suggests a lack of outcomes-oriented faculty-development programs in colleges and schools of pharmacy. Substantial steps are required toward the development and scholarly evaluation of faculty-development programs. As these programs are developed and assessed, evaluations must encompass all faculty subgroups, including tenure- and nontenure track faculty members, volunteer faculty members, women, and underrepresented minorities. This paper proposes AACP, college and school, and department-level recommendations intended to ensure faculty success in achieving tenure and promotion.

AB - The 2009-2010 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Council of Faculties Faculty Affairs Committee reviewed published literature assessing the scope and outcomes of faculty development for tenure and promotion. Relevant articles were identified via a PubMed search, review of pharmacy education journals, and identification of position papers from major healthcare professions academic organizations. While programs intended to enhance faculty development were described by some healthcare professions, relatively little specific to pharmacy has been published and none of the healthcare professions have adequately evaluated the impact of various faculty-development programs on associated outcomes. The paucity of published information strongly suggests a lack of outcomes-oriented faculty-development programs in colleges and schools of pharmacy. Substantial steps are required toward the development and scholarly evaluation of faculty-development programs. As these programs are developed and assessed, evaluations must encompass all faculty subgroups, including tenure- and nontenure track faculty members, volunteer faculty members, women, and underrepresented minorities. This paper proposes AACP, college and school, and department-level recommendations intended to ensure faculty success in achieving tenure and promotion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045352038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045352038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5688/ajpe756122

DO - 10.5688/ajpe756122

M3 - Review article

VL - 75

JO - American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

JF - American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

SN - 0002-9459

IS - 6

ER -