A low-fat dietary pattern and diabetes

A secondary analysis from the women's health initiative dietary modification trial

Barbara V. Howard, Aaron K. Aragaki, Lesley F. Tinker, Matthew Allison, Melanie D. Hingle, Karen Johnson, Jo Ann E. Manson, Aladdin H. Shadyab, James M. Shikany, Linda G. Snetselaar, Cynthia A. Thomson, Oleg Zaslavsky, Ross L. Prentice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We performed a secondary analysis to evaluate the effect of the Women's Health Initiative dietary intervention on incident diabetes and diabetes treatment in postmenopausal women. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 48,835 womenwere randomized to a comparison group or an intervention group that underwent a behavioral/nutritionalmodification programto decrease fat and increase vegetable, fruit, and grain intake for an average of 8.1 years. Ninetythree percent of participants completed the intervention, and 71% participated in active follow-up through 30 September 2015 (median 17.3 years).Wemeasured time to development of treated diabetes and progression from oral antihyperglycemic agents to insulin. Serum glucose and insulin were measured in a subsample of women (N = 2,324) at baseline and years 1, 3, and 6. RESULTS During the trial, intervention group women had lower rates of initiation of insulin therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74 [95%CI 0.59, 0.94]; P = 0.01).Moreover, womenwith baseline waist circumference ≥88 cm (P interaction = 0.01) and worse metabolic syndrome scores (P interaction = 0.02) had the greatest reduction in risk of initiating insulin therapy. The decreased risk from the intervention was present during the cumulative follow-up (HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.78, 0.99]; P = 0.04). In participants with measured biomarkers (5.8% subsample) who had baseline glucose <100 mg/dL, the intervention reduced the risk of developing glucose ≥100 mg/dL by 25% (odds ratio 0.75 [95% CI 0.61, 0.93]; P = 0.008). Adjustment for weight change did not alter the results. CONCLUSIONS In this secondary analysis, a dietary intervention in postmenopausal women aimed at reducing fat and increasing intake of vegetables, fruits, and grains did not increase risk of diabetes and may have slowed progression.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)680-687
Number of pages8
JournalDiabetes care
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Diet Therapy
Dietary Fats
Women's Health
Insulin
Glucose
Vegetables
Fruit
Fats
Waist Circumference
Risk Reduction Behavior
Hypoglycemic Agents
Research Design
Therapeutics
Biomarkers
Odds Ratio
Weights and Measures
Serum

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Howard, B. V., Aragaki, A. K., Tinker, L. F., Allison, M., Hingle, M. D., Johnson, K., ... Prentice, R. L. (2018). A low-fat dietary pattern and diabetes: A secondary analysis from the women's health initiative dietary modification trial. Diabetes care, 41(4), 680-687. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0534

A low-fat dietary pattern and diabetes : A secondary analysis from the women's health initiative dietary modification trial. / Howard, Barbara V.; Aragaki, Aaron K.; Tinker, Lesley F.; Allison, Matthew; Hingle, Melanie D.; Johnson, Karen; Manson, Jo Ann E.; Shadyab, Aladdin H.; Shikany, James M.; Snetselaar, Linda G.; Thomson, Cynthia A.; Zaslavsky, Oleg; Prentice, Ross L.

In: Diabetes care, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 680-687.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Howard, BV, Aragaki, AK, Tinker, LF, Allison, M, Hingle, MD, Johnson, K, Manson, JAE, Shadyab, AH, Shikany, JM, Snetselaar, LG, Thomson, CA, Zaslavsky, O & Prentice, RL 2018, 'A low-fat dietary pattern and diabetes: A secondary analysis from the women's health initiative dietary modification trial', Diabetes care, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 680-687. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0534
Howard, Barbara V. ; Aragaki, Aaron K. ; Tinker, Lesley F. ; Allison, Matthew ; Hingle, Melanie D. ; Johnson, Karen ; Manson, Jo Ann E. ; Shadyab, Aladdin H. ; Shikany, James M. ; Snetselaar, Linda G. ; Thomson, Cynthia A. ; Zaslavsky, Oleg ; Prentice, Ross L. / A low-fat dietary pattern and diabetes : A secondary analysis from the women's health initiative dietary modification trial. In: Diabetes care. 2018 ; Vol. 41, No. 4. pp. 680-687.
@article{3b1b0d3ba14d4dc2bd3c066e54d2f660,
title = "A low-fat dietary pattern and diabetes: A secondary analysis from the women's health initiative dietary modification trial",
abstract = "We performed a secondary analysis to evaluate the effect of the Women's Health Initiative dietary intervention on incident diabetes and diabetes treatment in postmenopausal women. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 48,835 womenwere randomized to a comparison group or an intervention group that underwent a behavioral/nutritionalmodification programto decrease fat and increase vegetable, fruit, and grain intake for an average of 8.1 years. Ninetythree percent of participants completed the intervention, and 71{\%} participated in active follow-up through 30 September 2015 (median 17.3 years).Wemeasured time to development of treated diabetes and progression from oral antihyperglycemic agents to insulin. Serum glucose and insulin were measured in a subsample of women (N = 2,324) at baseline and years 1, 3, and 6. RESULTS During the trial, intervention group women had lower rates of initiation of insulin therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74 [95{\%}CI 0.59, 0.94]; P = 0.01).Moreover, womenwith baseline waist circumference ≥88 cm (P interaction = 0.01) and worse metabolic syndrome scores (P interaction = 0.02) had the greatest reduction in risk of initiating insulin therapy. The decreased risk from the intervention was present during the cumulative follow-up (HR 0.88 [95{\%} CI 0.78, 0.99]; P = 0.04). In participants with measured biomarkers (5.8{\%} subsample) who had baseline glucose <100 mg/dL, the intervention reduced the risk of developing glucose ≥100 mg/dL by 25{\%} (odds ratio 0.75 [95{\%} CI 0.61, 0.93]; P = 0.008). Adjustment for weight change did not alter the results. CONCLUSIONS In this secondary analysis, a dietary intervention in postmenopausal women aimed at reducing fat and increasing intake of vegetables, fruits, and grains did not increase risk of diabetes and may have slowed progression.",
author = "Howard, {Barbara V.} and Aragaki, {Aaron K.} and Tinker, {Lesley F.} and Matthew Allison and Hingle, {Melanie D.} and Karen Johnson and Manson, {Jo Ann E.} and Shadyab, {Aladdin H.} and Shikany, {James M.} and Snetselaar, {Linda G.} and Thomson, {Cynthia A.} and Oleg Zaslavsky and Prentice, {Ross L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2337/dc17-0534",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "680--687",
journal = "Diabetes Care",
issn = "1935-5548",
publisher = "American Diabetes Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A low-fat dietary pattern and diabetes

T2 - A secondary analysis from the women's health initiative dietary modification trial

AU - Howard, Barbara V.

AU - Aragaki, Aaron K.

AU - Tinker, Lesley F.

AU - Allison, Matthew

AU - Hingle, Melanie D.

AU - Johnson, Karen

AU - Manson, Jo Ann E.

AU - Shadyab, Aladdin H.

AU - Shikany, James M.

AU - Snetselaar, Linda G.

AU - Thomson, Cynthia A.

AU - Zaslavsky, Oleg

AU - Prentice, Ross L.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - We performed a secondary analysis to evaluate the effect of the Women's Health Initiative dietary intervention on incident diabetes and diabetes treatment in postmenopausal women. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 48,835 womenwere randomized to a comparison group or an intervention group that underwent a behavioral/nutritionalmodification programto decrease fat and increase vegetable, fruit, and grain intake for an average of 8.1 years. Ninetythree percent of participants completed the intervention, and 71% participated in active follow-up through 30 September 2015 (median 17.3 years).Wemeasured time to development of treated diabetes and progression from oral antihyperglycemic agents to insulin. Serum glucose and insulin were measured in a subsample of women (N = 2,324) at baseline and years 1, 3, and 6. RESULTS During the trial, intervention group women had lower rates of initiation of insulin therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74 [95%CI 0.59, 0.94]; P = 0.01).Moreover, womenwith baseline waist circumference ≥88 cm (P interaction = 0.01) and worse metabolic syndrome scores (P interaction = 0.02) had the greatest reduction in risk of initiating insulin therapy. The decreased risk from the intervention was present during the cumulative follow-up (HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.78, 0.99]; P = 0.04). In participants with measured biomarkers (5.8% subsample) who had baseline glucose <100 mg/dL, the intervention reduced the risk of developing glucose ≥100 mg/dL by 25% (odds ratio 0.75 [95% CI 0.61, 0.93]; P = 0.008). Adjustment for weight change did not alter the results. CONCLUSIONS In this secondary analysis, a dietary intervention in postmenopausal women aimed at reducing fat and increasing intake of vegetables, fruits, and grains did not increase risk of diabetes and may have slowed progression.

AB - We performed a secondary analysis to evaluate the effect of the Women's Health Initiative dietary intervention on incident diabetes and diabetes treatment in postmenopausal women. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 48,835 womenwere randomized to a comparison group or an intervention group that underwent a behavioral/nutritionalmodification programto decrease fat and increase vegetable, fruit, and grain intake for an average of 8.1 years. Ninetythree percent of participants completed the intervention, and 71% participated in active follow-up through 30 September 2015 (median 17.3 years).Wemeasured time to development of treated diabetes and progression from oral antihyperglycemic agents to insulin. Serum glucose and insulin were measured in a subsample of women (N = 2,324) at baseline and years 1, 3, and 6. RESULTS During the trial, intervention group women had lower rates of initiation of insulin therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74 [95%CI 0.59, 0.94]; P = 0.01).Moreover, womenwith baseline waist circumference ≥88 cm (P interaction = 0.01) and worse metabolic syndrome scores (P interaction = 0.02) had the greatest reduction in risk of initiating insulin therapy. The decreased risk from the intervention was present during the cumulative follow-up (HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.78, 0.99]; P = 0.04). In participants with measured biomarkers (5.8% subsample) who had baseline glucose <100 mg/dL, the intervention reduced the risk of developing glucose ≥100 mg/dL by 25% (odds ratio 0.75 [95% CI 0.61, 0.93]; P = 0.008). Adjustment for weight change did not alter the results. CONCLUSIONS In this secondary analysis, a dietary intervention in postmenopausal women aimed at reducing fat and increasing intake of vegetables, fruits, and grains did not increase risk of diabetes and may have slowed progression.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044519708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044519708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2337/dc17-0534

DO - 10.2337/dc17-0534

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 680

EP - 687

JO - Diabetes Care

JF - Diabetes Care

SN - 1935-5548

IS - 4

ER -