A pragmatic application of the RE-AIM framework for evaluating the implementation of physical activity as a standard of care in health systems

Mark Stoutenberg, Karla I. Galaviz, Felipe Lobelo, Elizabeth Joy, Gregory Heath, Adrian Hutber, Paul Estabrooks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Exercise is Medicine (EIM) is an initiative that seeks to integrate physical activity assessment, prescription, and patient referral as a standard in patient care. Methods to assess this integration have lagged behind its implementation. Purpose and Objectives The purpose of this work is to provide a pragmatic framework to guide health care systems in assessing the implementation and impact of EIM. Evaluation Methods A working group of experts from health care, public health, and implementation science convened to develop an evaluation model based on the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework. The working group aimed to provide pragmatic guidance on operationalizing EIM across the different RE-AIM dimensions based on data typically available in health care settings. Results The Reach of EIM can be determined by the number and proportion of patients that were screened for physical inactivity, received brief counseling and/or a physical activity prescription, and were referred to physical activity resources. Effectiveness can be assessed through self-reported changes in physical activity, cardiometabolic biometric factors, incidence/burden of chronic disease, as well as health care utilization and costs. Adoption includes assessing the number and representativeness of health care settings that adopt any component of EIM, and Implementation involves assessing the extent to which health care teams implement EIM in their clinic. Finally, Maintenance involves assessing the long-term effectiveness (patient level) and sustained implementation (clinic level) of EIM in a given health care setting. Implications for Public Health The availability of a standardized, pragmatic, evaluation framework is critical in determining the impact of implementing EIM as a standard of care across health care systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number170344
JournalPreventing Chronic Disease
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Standard of Care
Maintenance
Exercise
Health
Medicine
Delivery of Health Care
Prescriptions
Public Health
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Patient Care Team
Health Care Costs
Counseling
Patient Care
Chronic Disease
Referral and Consultation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

A pragmatic application of the RE-AIM framework for evaluating the implementation of physical activity as a standard of care in health systems. / Stoutenberg, Mark; Galaviz, Karla I.; Lobelo, Felipe; Joy, Elizabeth; Heath, Gregory; Hutber, Adrian; Estabrooks, Paul.

In: Preventing Chronic Disease, Vol. 15, No. 5, 170344, 01.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stoutenberg, Mark ; Galaviz, Karla I. ; Lobelo, Felipe ; Joy, Elizabeth ; Heath, Gregory ; Hutber, Adrian ; Estabrooks, Paul. / A pragmatic application of the RE-AIM framework for evaluating the implementation of physical activity as a standard of care in health systems. In: Preventing Chronic Disease. 2018 ; Vol. 15, No. 5.
@article{b7d4d86e83c84d22b349818ddac76828,
title = "A pragmatic application of the RE-AIM framework for evaluating the implementation of physical activity as a standard of care in health systems",
abstract = "Introduction Exercise is Medicine (EIM) is an initiative that seeks to integrate physical activity assessment, prescription, and patient referral as a standard in patient care. Methods to assess this integration have lagged behind its implementation. Purpose and Objectives The purpose of this work is to provide a pragmatic framework to guide health care systems in assessing the implementation and impact of EIM. Evaluation Methods A working group of experts from health care, public health, and implementation science convened to develop an evaluation model based on the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework. The working group aimed to provide pragmatic guidance on operationalizing EIM across the different RE-AIM dimensions based on data typically available in health care settings. Results The Reach of EIM can be determined by the number and proportion of patients that were screened for physical inactivity, received brief counseling and/or a physical activity prescription, and were referred to physical activity resources. Effectiveness can be assessed through self-reported changes in physical activity, cardiometabolic biometric factors, incidence/burden of chronic disease, as well as health care utilization and costs. Adoption includes assessing the number and representativeness of health care settings that adopt any component of EIM, and Implementation involves assessing the extent to which health care teams implement EIM in their clinic. Finally, Maintenance involves assessing the long-term effectiveness (patient level) and sustained implementation (clinic level) of EIM in a given health care setting. Implications for Public Health The availability of a standardized, pragmatic, evaluation framework is critical in determining the impact of implementing EIM as a standard of care across health care systems.",
author = "Mark Stoutenberg and Galaviz, {Karla I.} and Felipe Lobelo and Elizabeth Joy and Gregory Heath and Adrian Hutber and Paul Estabrooks",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5888/pcd15.170344",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "Preventing chronic disease",
issn = "1545-1151",
publisher = "U.S. Department of Health and Human Services",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A pragmatic application of the RE-AIM framework for evaluating the implementation of physical activity as a standard of care in health systems

AU - Stoutenberg, Mark

AU - Galaviz, Karla I.

AU - Lobelo, Felipe

AU - Joy, Elizabeth

AU - Heath, Gregory

AU - Hutber, Adrian

AU - Estabrooks, Paul

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Introduction Exercise is Medicine (EIM) is an initiative that seeks to integrate physical activity assessment, prescription, and patient referral as a standard in patient care. Methods to assess this integration have lagged behind its implementation. Purpose and Objectives The purpose of this work is to provide a pragmatic framework to guide health care systems in assessing the implementation and impact of EIM. Evaluation Methods A working group of experts from health care, public health, and implementation science convened to develop an evaluation model based on the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework. The working group aimed to provide pragmatic guidance on operationalizing EIM across the different RE-AIM dimensions based on data typically available in health care settings. Results The Reach of EIM can be determined by the number and proportion of patients that were screened for physical inactivity, received brief counseling and/or a physical activity prescription, and were referred to physical activity resources. Effectiveness can be assessed through self-reported changes in physical activity, cardiometabolic biometric factors, incidence/burden of chronic disease, as well as health care utilization and costs. Adoption includes assessing the number and representativeness of health care settings that adopt any component of EIM, and Implementation involves assessing the extent to which health care teams implement EIM in their clinic. Finally, Maintenance involves assessing the long-term effectiveness (patient level) and sustained implementation (clinic level) of EIM in a given health care setting. Implications for Public Health The availability of a standardized, pragmatic, evaluation framework is critical in determining the impact of implementing EIM as a standard of care across health care systems.

AB - Introduction Exercise is Medicine (EIM) is an initiative that seeks to integrate physical activity assessment, prescription, and patient referral as a standard in patient care. Methods to assess this integration have lagged behind its implementation. Purpose and Objectives The purpose of this work is to provide a pragmatic framework to guide health care systems in assessing the implementation and impact of EIM. Evaluation Methods A working group of experts from health care, public health, and implementation science convened to develop an evaluation model based on the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework. The working group aimed to provide pragmatic guidance on operationalizing EIM across the different RE-AIM dimensions based on data typically available in health care settings. Results The Reach of EIM can be determined by the number and proportion of patients that were screened for physical inactivity, received brief counseling and/or a physical activity prescription, and were referred to physical activity resources. Effectiveness can be assessed through self-reported changes in physical activity, cardiometabolic biometric factors, incidence/burden of chronic disease, as well as health care utilization and costs. Adoption includes assessing the number and representativeness of health care settings that adopt any component of EIM, and Implementation involves assessing the extent to which health care teams implement EIM in their clinic. Finally, Maintenance involves assessing the long-term effectiveness (patient level) and sustained implementation (clinic level) of EIM in a given health care setting. Implications for Public Health The availability of a standardized, pragmatic, evaluation framework is critical in determining the impact of implementing EIM as a standard of care across health care systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045287761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045287761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5888/pcd15.170344

DO - 10.5888/pcd15.170344

M3 - Article

VL - 15

JO - Preventing chronic disease

JF - Preventing chronic disease

SN - 1545-1151

IS - 5

M1 - 170344

ER -