Absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias in a growing animal model

Rodrigo Gonzalez, Sarah J. Hill, Samer G. Mattar, Edward Lin, Bruce Ramshaw, C. Daniel Smith, Mark L. Wulkan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The repair of large congenital diaphragmatic hernia frequently results in patch disruption and recurrence as patients grow in size. Absorbable meshes allow for ingrowth of endogenous tissue as they are degraded, providing a more natural and durable repair. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of the new diaphragmatic tissue between an absorbable biologic mesh and a nonabsorbable mesh for repairing diaphragmatic hernia in a growing animal model. Methods: The left hemi-diaphragm of twenty 2-month-old Yucatan pigs was nearly completely resected. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS; Cook Biotech, Lafayette, IN) and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE; W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) were randomly assigned to cover the defect in 10 animals each, and were survived for 6 months. During necropsy, newly formed diaphragmatic tissue was evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results: At necropsy, the animals had tripled their weight. Patch disruption and herniation occurred in 3 animals in the ePTFE group and none in the SIS group. The SIS mesh had better integration to the chest wall (2.8±0.2 versus 1.3±0.3), more muscle growth within the newly formed diaphragmatic tissue (1.9±0.2 versus 0.4±0.2), and less fibrotic tissue (2.1±0.5 versus 3.4±0.4) than ePTFE. There was no difference between SIS and ePTFE in terms of adhesion scores to the lung (2±0.4 versus 2.4±0.4) and liver (1.8±0.3 versus 2.2±0.5). Conclusion: SIS allows for tissue ingrowth from surrounding tissue as it degrades, providing a more durable repair with 30% less incidence of herniation in a porcine model. As the diaphragm grows, SIS resulted in a more natural repair of the defect with more tissue growth, better tissue integration, and a comparable adhesion formation to ePTFE.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)449-454
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011

Fingerprint

Animal Models
Diaphragm
Swine
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernias
Diaphragmatic Hernia
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Thoracic Wall
Growth
Weights and Measures
Recurrence
Muscles
Lung
Liver
Incidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias in a growing animal model. / Gonzalez, Rodrigo; Hill, Sarah J.; Mattar, Samer G.; Lin, Edward; Ramshaw, Bruce; Smith, C. Daniel; Wulkan, Mark L.

In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, Vol. 21, No. 5, 01.06.2011, p. 449-454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gonzalez, Rodrigo ; Hill, Sarah J. ; Mattar, Samer G. ; Lin, Edward ; Ramshaw, Bruce ; Smith, C. Daniel ; Wulkan, Mark L. / Absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias in a growing animal model. In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2011 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 449-454.
@article{724a6eeae4234214accf38c7bb326bd3,
title = "Absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias in a growing animal model",
abstract = "Introduction: The repair of large congenital diaphragmatic hernia frequently results in patch disruption and recurrence as patients grow in size. Absorbable meshes allow for ingrowth of endogenous tissue as they are degraded, providing a more natural and durable repair. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of the new diaphragmatic tissue between an absorbable biologic mesh and a nonabsorbable mesh for repairing diaphragmatic hernia in a growing animal model. Methods: The left hemi-diaphragm of twenty 2-month-old Yucatan pigs was nearly completely resected. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS; Cook Biotech, Lafayette, IN) and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE; W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) were randomly assigned to cover the defect in 10 animals each, and were survived for 6 months. During necropsy, newly formed diaphragmatic tissue was evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results: At necropsy, the animals had tripled their weight. Patch disruption and herniation occurred in 3 animals in the ePTFE group and none in the SIS group. The SIS mesh had better integration to the chest wall (2.8±0.2 versus 1.3±0.3), more muscle growth within the newly formed diaphragmatic tissue (1.9±0.2 versus 0.4±0.2), and less fibrotic tissue (2.1±0.5 versus 3.4±0.4) than ePTFE. There was no difference between SIS and ePTFE in terms of adhesion scores to the lung (2±0.4 versus 2.4±0.4) and liver (1.8±0.3 versus 2.2±0.5). Conclusion: SIS allows for tissue ingrowth from surrounding tissue as it degrades, providing a more durable repair with 30{\%} less incidence of herniation in a porcine model. As the diaphragm grows, SIS resulted in a more natural repair of the defect with more tissue growth, better tissue integration, and a comparable adhesion formation to ePTFE.",
author = "Rodrigo Gonzalez and Hill, {Sarah J.} and Mattar, {Samer G.} and Edward Lin and Bruce Ramshaw and Smith, {C. Daniel} and Wulkan, {Mark L.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/lap.2010.0409",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "449--454",
journal = "Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A",
issn = "1092-6429",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias in a growing animal model

AU - Gonzalez, Rodrigo

AU - Hill, Sarah J.

AU - Mattar, Samer G.

AU - Lin, Edward

AU - Ramshaw, Bruce

AU - Smith, C. Daniel

AU - Wulkan, Mark L.

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - Introduction: The repair of large congenital diaphragmatic hernia frequently results in patch disruption and recurrence as patients grow in size. Absorbable meshes allow for ingrowth of endogenous tissue as they are degraded, providing a more natural and durable repair. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of the new diaphragmatic tissue between an absorbable biologic mesh and a nonabsorbable mesh for repairing diaphragmatic hernia in a growing animal model. Methods: The left hemi-diaphragm of twenty 2-month-old Yucatan pigs was nearly completely resected. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS; Cook Biotech, Lafayette, IN) and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE; W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) were randomly assigned to cover the defect in 10 animals each, and were survived for 6 months. During necropsy, newly formed diaphragmatic tissue was evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results: At necropsy, the animals had tripled their weight. Patch disruption and herniation occurred in 3 animals in the ePTFE group and none in the SIS group. The SIS mesh had better integration to the chest wall (2.8±0.2 versus 1.3±0.3), more muscle growth within the newly formed diaphragmatic tissue (1.9±0.2 versus 0.4±0.2), and less fibrotic tissue (2.1±0.5 versus 3.4±0.4) than ePTFE. There was no difference between SIS and ePTFE in terms of adhesion scores to the lung (2±0.4 versus 2.4±0.4) and liver (1.8±0.3 versus 2.2±0.5). Conclusion: SIS allows for tissue ingrowth from surrounding tissue as it degrades, providing a more durable repair with 30% less incidence of herniation in a porcine model. As the diaphragm grows, SIS resulted in a more natural repair of the defect with more tissue growth, better tissue integration, and a comparable adhesion formation to ePTFE.

AB - Introduction: The repair of large congenital diaphragmatic hernia frequently results in patch disruption and recurrence as patients grow in size. Absorbable meshes allow for ingrowth of endogenous tissue as they are degraded, providing a more natural and durable repair. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of the new diaphragmatic tissue between an absorbable biologic mesh and a nonabsorbable mesh for repairing diaphragmatic hernia in a growing animal model. Methods: The left hemi-diaphragm of twenty 2-month-old Yucatan pigs was nearly completely resected. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS; Cook Biotech, Lafayette, IN) and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE; W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) were randomly assigned to cover the defect in 10 animals each, and were survived for 6 months. During necropsy, newly formed diaphragmatic tissue was evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results: At necropsy, the animals had tripled their weight. Patch disruption and herniation occurred in 3 animals in the ePTFE group and none in the SIS group. The SIS mesh had better integration to the chest wall (2.8±0.2 versus 1.3±0.3), more muscle growth within the newly formed diaphragmatic tissue (1.9±0.2 versus 0.4±0.2), and less fibrotic tissue (2.1±0.5 versus 3.4±0.4) than ePTFE. There was no difference between SIS and ePTFE in terms of adhesion scores to the lung (2±0.4 versus 2.4±0.4) and liver (1.8±0.3 versus 2.2±0.5). Conclusion: SIS allows for tissue ingrowth from surrounding tissue as it degrades, providing a more durable repair with 30% less incidence of herniation in a porcine model. As the diaphragm grows, SIS resulted in a more natural repair of the defect with more tissue growth, better tissue integration, and a comparable adhesion formation to ePTFE.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958225962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958225962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/lap.2010.0409

DO - 10.1089/lap.2010.0409

M3 - Article

C2 - 21542768

AN - SCOPUS:79958225962

VL - 21

SP - 449

EP - 454

JO - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A

JF - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A

SN - 1092-6429

IS - 5

ER -