Anterior cervical fixation

Analysis of load-sharing and stability with use of static and dynamic plates

Darrel S. Brodke, Paul Klimo, Kent N. Bachus, John T. Braun, Andrew T. Dailey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Anterior plates provide stability following decompression and fusion of the cervical spine. Various plate designs have emerged, and they include static plates with fixed-angle screws, rotationally dynamic plates that allow the screws to toggle in the plate, and translationally dynamic plates that allow the screws to both toggle and translate vertically. The goal of this study was to document the effects of plate design following a single-level corpectomy and placement of a full-length strut graft and the effects following 10% subsidence of the graft. Methods: A total of twenty-one cadaveric cervical spines (C2-T1) were randomized into three treatment groups and were tested for initial range of motion. A C5 corpectomy was performed, reconstruction was done with a full-length interbody spacer containing a load-cell, and an anterior cervical plate was applied. Load-sharing data were recorded with incremental axial loads. The range of motion was measured with ±2.5 Nm of torque in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Then, the total length of the interbody spacer was reduced by 10% to simulate subsidence, and load-sharing and the range of motion were retested. Results: With the full-length interbody spacer, there were no significant differences in the abilities of the constructs to share load or limit motion. Following shortening of the interbody spacer, the static plate construct lost nearly 70% of its load-sharing capability, while neither of the dynamic plate constructs lost load-sharing capabilities. Also, the static plate construct allowed significantly more motion in flexion-extension following simulated subsidence than did either of the dynamic plate constructs (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although all of the tested anterior cervical plating systems provide similar load-sharing and stiffness following initial placement of the interbody spacer, the static plate system lost its ability to share load and limit motion following simulated subsidence of the interbody spacer. Both dynamic plate systems maintained load-sharing and stiffness despite simulated subsidence. Clinical Relevance: This study provides an improved understanding of the immediate performance of anterior cervical fusion surgery with plate fixation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1566-1573
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
Volume88
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Articular Range of Motion
Spine
Transplants
Information Dissemination
Torque
Decompression
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Anterior cervical fixation : Analysis of load-sharing and stability with use of static and dynamic plates. / Brodke, Darrel S.; Klimo, Paul; Bachus, Kent N.; Braun, John T.; Dailey, Andrew T.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, Vol. 88, No. 7, 01.07.2006, p. 1566-1573.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brodke, Darrel S. ; Klimo, Paul ; Bachus, Kent N. ; Braun, John T. ; Dailey, Andrew T. / Anterior cervical fixation : Analysis of load-sharing and stability with use of static and dynamic plates. In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A. 2006 ; Vol. 88, No. 7. pp. 1566-1573.
@article{ba8381a0abf043cbb74e60fc6f279540,
title = "Anterior cervical fixation: Analysis of load-sharing and stability with use of static and dynamic plates",
abstract = "Background: Anterior plates provide stability following decompression and fusion of the cervical spine. Various plate designs have emerged, and they include static plates with fixed-angle screws, rotationally dynamic plates that allow the screws to toggle in the plate, and translationally dynamic plates that allow the screws to both toggle and translate vertically. The goal of this study was to document the effects of plate design following a single-level corpectomy and placement of a full-length strut graft and the effects following 10{\%} subsidence of the graft. Methods: A total of twenty-one cadaveric cervical spines (C2-T1) were randomized into three treatment groups and were tested for initial range of motion. A C5 corpectomy was performed, reconstruction was done with a full-length interbody spacer containing a load-cell, and an anterior cervical plate was applied. Load-sharing data were recorded with incremental axial loads. The range of motion was measured with ±2.5 Nm of torque in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Then, the total length of the interbody spacer was reduced by 10{\%} to simulate subsidence, and load-sharing and the range of motion were retested. Results: With the full-length interbody spacer, there were no significant differences in the abilities of the constructs to share load or limit motion. Following shortening of the interbody spacer, the static plate construct lost nearly 70{\%} of its load-sharing capability, while neither of the dynamic plate constructs lost load-sharing capabilities. Also, the static plate construct allowed significantly more motion in flexion-extension following simulated subsidence than did either of the dynamic plate constructs (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although all of the tested anterior cervical plating systems provide similar load-sharing and stiffness following initial placement of the interbody spacer, the static plate system lost its ability to share load and limit motion following simulated subsidence of the interbody spacer. Both dynamic plate systems maintained load-sharing and stiffness despite simulated subsidence. Clinical Relevance: This study provides an improved understanding of the immediate performance of anterior cervical fusion surgery with plate fixation.",
author = "Brodke, {Darrel S.} and Paul Klimo and Bachus, {Kent N.} and Braun, {John T.} and Dailey, {Andrew T.}",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2106/JBJS.E.00305",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "1566--1573",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anterior cervical fixation

T2 - Analysis of load-sharing and stability with use of static and dynamic plates

AU - Brodke, Darrel S.

AU - Klimo, Paul

AU - Bachus, Kent N.

AU - Braun, John T.

AU - Dailey, Andrew T.

PY - 2006/7/1

Y1 - 2006/7/1

N2 - Background: Anterior plates provide stability following decompression and fusion of the cervical spine. Various plate designs have emerged, and they include static plates with fixed-angle screws, rotationally dynamic plates that allow the screws to toggle in the plate, and translationally dynamic plates that allow the screws to both toggle and translate vertically. The goal of this study was to document the effects of plate design following a single-level corpectomy and placement of a full-length strut graft and the effects following 10% subsidence of the graft. Methods: A total of twenty-one cadaveric cervical spines (C2-T1) were randomized into three treatment groups and were tested for initial range of motion. A C5 corpectomy was performed, reconstruction was done with a full-length interbody spacer containing a load-cell, and an anterior cervical plate was applied. Load-sharing data were recorded with incremental axial loads. The range of motion was measured with ±2.5 Nm of torque in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Then, the total length of the interbody spacer was reduced by 10% to simulate subsidence, and load-sharing and the range of motion were retested. Results: With the full-length interbody spacer, there were no significant differences in the abilities of the constructs to share load or limit motion. Following shortening of the interbody spacer, the static plate construct lost nearly 70% of its load-sharing capability, while neither of the dynamic plate constructs lost load-sharing capabilities. Also, the static plate construct allowed significantly more motion in flexion-extension following simulated subsidence than did either of the dynamic plate constructs (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although all of the tested anterior cervical plating systems provide similar load-sharing and stiffness following initial placement of the interbody spacer, the static plate system lost its ability to share load and limit motion following simulated subsidence of the interbody spacer. Both dynamic plate systems maintained load-sharing and stiffness despite simulated subsidence. Clinical Relevance: This study provides an improved understanding of the immediate performance of anterior cervical fusion surgery with plate fixation.

AB - Background: Anterior plates provide stability following decompression and fusion of the cervical spine. Various plate designs have emerged, and they include static plates with fixed-angle screws, rotationally dynamic plates that allow the screws to toggle in the plate, and translationally dynamic plates that allow the screws to both toggle and translate vertically. The goal of this study was to document the effects of plate design following a single-level corpectomy and placement of a full-length strut graft and the effects following 10% subsidence of the graft. Methods: A total of twenty-one cadaveric cervical spines (C2-T1) were randomized into three treatment groups and were tested for initial range of motion. A C5 corpectomy was performed, reconstruction was done with a full-length interbody spacer containing a load-cell, and an anterior cervical plate was applied. Load-sharing data were recorded with incremental axial loads. The range of motion was measured with ±2.5 Nm of torque in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Then, the total length of the interbody spacer was reduced by 10% to simulate subsidence, and load-sharing and the range of motion were retested. Results: With the full-length interbody spacer, there were no significant differences in the abilities of the constructs to share load or limit motion. Following shortening of the interbody spacer, the static plate construct lost nearly 70% of its load-sharing capability, while neither of the dynamic plate constructs lost load-sharing capabilities. Also, the static plate construct allowed significantly more motion in flexion-extension following simulated subsidence than did either of the dynamic plate constructs (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although all of the tested anterior cervical plating systems provide similar load-sharing and stiffness following initial placement of the interbody spacer, the static plate system lost its ability to share load and limit motion following simulated subsidence of the interbody spacer. Both dynamic plate systems maintained load-sharing and stiffness despite simulated subsidence. Clinical Relevance: This study provides an improved understanding of the immediate performance of anterior cervical fusion surgery with plate fixation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745726994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745726994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.E.00305

DO - 10.2106/JBJS.E.00305

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 1566

EP - 1573

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A

SN - 0021-9355

IS - 7

ER -