Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient

A systematic review and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

Mayur B. Patel, Stephen S. Humble, Daniel C. Cullinane, Matthew A. Day, Randeep S. Jawa, Clinton J. Devin, Margaret S. Delozier, Lou Smith, Miya A. Smith, Jeannette M. Capella, Andrea M. Long, Joseph S. Cheng, Taylor C. Leath, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Elliott R. Haut, John J. Como

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: With the use of the framework advocated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)Working Group, our aimswere to perform a systematic reviewand to develop evidence-based recommendations that may be used to answer the following PICO [Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes] question: In the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient, should cervical collar removal be performed after a negative high-quality cervical spine (C-spine) computed tomography (CT) result alone or after a negative high-quality C-spine CT result combined with adjunct imaging, to reduce peri-clearance events, such as new neurologic change, unstable C-spine injury, stable C-spine injury, need for post-clearance imaging, false-negative CT imaging result on re-review, pressure ulcers, and time to cervical collar clearance? Methods: Our protocol was registered with the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews on August 23, 2013 (Registration Number: CRD42013005461). Eligibility criteria consisted of adult blunt trauma patients 16 years or older, who underwent C-spine CT with axial thickness of less than 3 mm and who were obtunded using any definition. Quantitative synthesis via meta-analysis was not possible because of pre-post, partial-cohort, quasi-experimental study design limitations and the consequential incomplete diagnostic accuracy data. Results: of five articles with a total follow-up of 1,017 included subjects, none reported new neurologic changes (paraplegia or quadriplegia) after cervical collar removal. There is a worst-case 9% (161 of 1,718 subjects in 11 studies) cumulative literature incidence of stable injuries and a 91% negative predictive value of no injury, after coupling a negative high-quality C-spine CT result with 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging, upright x-rays, flexion-extension CT, and/or clinical follow-up. Similarly, there is a best-case 0% (0 of 1,718 subjects in 11 studies) cumulative literature incidence of unstable injuries after negative initial imaging result with a high-quality C-spine CT. Conclusion: In obtunded adult blunt trauma patients, we conditionally recommend cervical collar removal after a negative high-quality C-spine CT scan result alone. Level of Evidence: Systematic review, level III.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)430-441
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume78
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Practice Management
Practice Guidelines
Spine
Tomography
Wounds and Injuries
Nervous System
Quadriplegia
Pressure Ulcer
Paraplegia
Incidence
Meta-Analysis
Research Design
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
X-Rays
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient : A systematic review and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. / Patel, Mayur B.; Humble, Stephen S.; Cullinane, Daniel C.; Day, Matthew A.; Jawa, Randeep S.; Devin, Clinton J.; Delozier, Margaret S.; Smith, Lou; Smith, Miya A.; Capella, Jeannette M.; Long, Andrea M.; Cheng, Joseph S.; Leath, Taylor C.; Falck-Ytter, Yngve; Haut, Elliott R.; Como, John J.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 78, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 430-441.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Patel, MB, Humble, SS, Cullinane, DC, Day, MA, Jawa, RS, Devin, CJ, Delozier, MS, Smith, L, Smith, MA, Capella, JM, Long, AM, Cheng, JS, Leath, TC, Falck-Ytter, Y, Haut, ER & Como, JJ 2015, 'Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient: A systematic review and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma', Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 430-441. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000503
Patel, Mayur B. ; Humble, Stephen S. ; Cullinane, Daniel C. ; Day, Matthew A. ; Jawa, Randeep S. ; Devin, Clinton J. ; Delozier, Margaret S. ; Smith, Lou ; Smith, Miya A. ; Capella, Jeannette M. ; Long, Andrea M. ; Cheng, Joseph S. ; Leath, Taylor C. ; Falck-Ytter, Yngve ; Haut, Elliott R. ; Como, John J. / Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient : A systematic review and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 78, No. 2. pp. 430-441.
@article{67fd651eec4c4ae4b5d86a2276e87e34,
title = "Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient: A systematic review and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma",
abstract = "Background: With the use of the framework advocated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)Working Group, our aimswere to perform a systematic reviewand to develop evidence-based recommendations that may be used to answer the following PICO [Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes] question: In the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient, should cervical collar removal be performed after a negative high-quality cervical spine (C-spine) computed tomography (CT) result alone or after a negative high-quality C-spine CT result combined with adjunct imaging, to reduce peri-clearance events, such as new neurologic change, unstable C-spine injury, stable C-spine injury, need for post-clearance imaging, false-negative CT imaging result on re-review, pressure ulcers, and time to cervical collar clearance? Methods: Our protocol was registered with the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews on August 23, 2013 (Registration Number: CRD42013005461). Eligibility criteria consisted of adult blunt trauma patients 16 years or older, who underwent C-spine CT with axial thickness of less than 3 mm and who were obtunded using any definition. Quantitative synthesis via meta-analysis was not possible because of pre-post, partial-cohort, quasi-experimental study design limitations and the consequential incomplete diagnostic accuracy data. Results: of five articles with a total follow-up of 1,017 included subjects, none reported new neurologic changes (paraplegia or quadriplegia) after cervical collar removal. There is a worst-case 9{\%} (161 of 1,718 subjects in 11 studies) cumulative literature incidence of stable injuries and a 91{\%} negative predictive value of no injury, after coupling a negative high-quality C-spine CT result with 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging, upright x-rays, flexion-extension CT, and/or clinical follow-up. Similarly, there is a best-case 0{\%} (0 of 1,718 subjects in 11 studies) cumulative literature incidence of unstable injuries after negative initial imaging result with a high-quality C-spine CT. Conclusion: In obtunded adult blunt trauma patients, we conditionally recommend cervical collar removal after a negative high-quality C-spine CT scan result alone. Level of Evidence: Systematic review, level III.",
author = "Patel, {Mayur B.} and Humble, {Stephen S.} and Cullinane, {Daniel C.} and Day, {Matthew A.} and Jawa, {Randeep S.} and Devin, {Clinton J.} and Delozier, {Margaret S.} and Lou Smith and Smith, {Miya A.} and Capella, {Jeannette M.} and Long, {Andrea M.} and Cheng, {Joseph S.} and Leath, {Taylor C.} and Yngve Falck-Ytter and Haut, {Elliott R.} and Como, {John J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0000000000000503",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "430--441",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient

T2 - A systematic review and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

AU - Patel, Mayur B.

AU - Humble, Stephen S.

AU - Cullinane, Daniel C.

AU - Day, Matthew A.

AU - Jawa, Randeep S.

AU - Devin, Clinton J.

AU - Delozier, Margaret S.

AU - Smith, Lou

AU - Smith, Miya A.

AU - Capella, Jeannette M.

AU - Long, Andrea M.

AU - Cheng, Joseph S.

AU - Leath, Taylor C.

AU - Falck-Ytter, Yngve

AU - Haut, Elliott R.

AU - Como, John J.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Background: With the use of the framework advocated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)Working Group, our aimswere to perform a systematic reviewand to develop evidence-based recommendations that may be used to answer the following PICO [Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes] question: In the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient, should cervical collar removal be performed after a negative high-quality cervical spine (C-spine) computed tomography (CT) result alone or after a negative high-quality C-spine CT result combined with adjunct imaging, to reduce peri-clearance events, such as new neurologic change, unstable C-spine injury, stable C-spine injury, need for post-clearance imaging, false-negative CT imaging result on re-review, pressure ulcers, and time to cervical collar clearance? Methods: Our protocol was registered with the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews on August 23, 2013 (Registration Number: CRD42013005461). Eligibility criteria consisted of adult blunt trauma patients 16 years or older, who underwent C-spine CT with axial thickness of less than 3 mm and who were obtunded using any definition. Quantitative synthesis via meta-analysis was not possible because of pre-post, partial-cohort, quasi-experimental study design limitations and the consequential incomplete diagnostic accuracy data. Results: of five articles with a total follow-up of 1,017 included subjects, none reported new neurologic changes (paraplegia or quadriplegia) after cervical collar removal. There is a worst-case 9% (161 of 1,718 subjects in 11 studies) cumulative literature incidence of stable injuries and a 91% negative predictive value of no injury, after coupling a negative high-quality C-spine CT result with 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging, upright x-rays, flexion-extension CT, and/or clinical follow-up. Similarly, there is a best-case 0% (0 of 1,718 subjects in 11 studies) cumulative literature incidence of unstable injuries after negative initial imaging result with a high-quality C-spine CT. Conclusion: In obtunded adult blunt trauma patients, we conditionally recommend cervical collar removal after a negative high-quality C-spine CT scan result alone. Level of Evidence: Systematic review, level III.

AB - Background: With the use of the framework advocated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)Working Group, our aimswere to perform a systematic reviewand to develop evidence-based recommendations that may be used to answer the following PICO [Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes] question: In the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient, should cervical collar removal be performed after a negative high-quality cervical spine (C-spine) computed tomography (CT) result alone or after a negative high-quality C-spine CT result combined with adjunct imaging, to reduce peri-clearance events, such as new neurologic change, unstable C-spine injury, stable C-spine injury, need for post-clearance imaging, false-negative CT imaging result on re-review, pressure ulcers, and time to cervical collar clearance? Methods: Our protocol was registered with the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews on August 23, 2013 (Registration Number: CRD42013005461). Eligibility criteria consisted of adult blunt trauma patients 16 years or older, who underwent C-spine CT with axial thickness of less than 3 mm and who were obtunded using any definition. Quantitative synthesis via meta-analysis was not possible because of pre-post, partial-cohort, quasi-experimental study design limitations and the consequential incomplete diagnostic accuracy data. Results: of five articles with a total follow-up of 1,017 included subjects, none reported new neurologic changes (paraplegia or quadriplegia) after cervical collar removal. There is a worst-case 9% (161 of 1,718 subjects in 11 studies) cumulative literature incidence of stable injuries and a 91% negative predictive value of no injury, after coupling a negative high-quality C-spine CT result with 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging, upright x-rays, flexion-extension CT, and/or clinical follow-up. Similarly, there is a best-case 0% (0 of 1,718 subjects in 11 studies) cumulative literature incidence of unstable injuries after negative initial imaging result with a high-quality C-spine CT. Conclusion: In obtunded adult blunt trauma patients, we conditionally recommend cervical collar removal after a negative high-quality C-spine CT scan result alone. Level of Evidence: Systematic review, level III.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925873968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925873968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000000503

DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000000503

M3 - Review article

VL - 78

SP - 430

EP - 441

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 2

ER -