Characteristics of Air Force Personnel Who Choose Pharmacological Aids for Smoking Cessation Following an Involuntary Tobacco Ban and Tobacco Control Program

Robert Klesges, Lisa M. Klesges, Mark W. Vander Weg, Margaret DeBon, Walker S.Carlos Poston, Jon Ebbert, J. Taylor Hays, C. Keith Haddock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare characteristics of smokers who did and did not report use of cessation aids as part of a tobacco control program in a military setting (n = 8994). Design: The study is a longitudinal epidemiological study where the relationship between smoking status at follow-up and use of pharmacologic aids to quit smoking were assessed. Main Outcome Measures: Smoking cessation, post baseline use of cessation aids to quit smoking. Results and Conclusions: Individuals remaining abstinent were 70% less likely to have used NRT/pharmacological aids compared to those that relapsed. NRT/pharmacological aid users were more likely to report plans to smoke after military training, to have friends who smoke, and to accept a cigarette from a friend. NRT/pharmacological aid users were more likely to believe that using NRT was safer than smoking and to have engaged in harm reduction strategies. Our findings suggest that selection bias related to such characteristics may explain some of the discrepancies between effect sizes reported in efficacy compared to effectiveness studies of NRT and smoking outcomes currently reported in the literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)588-597
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Psychology
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2007

Fingerprint

Military Personnel
Smoking Cessation
Tobacco
Smoking
Pharmacology
Smoke
Harm Reduction
Selection Bias
Tobacco Products
Longitudinal Studies
Epidemiologic Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Characteristics of Air Force Personnel Who Choose Pharmacological Aids for Smoking Cessation Following an Involuntary Tobacco Ban and Tobacco Control Program. / Klesges, Robert; Klesges, Lisa M.; Vander Weg, Mark W.; DeBon, Margaret; Poston, Walker S.Carlos; Ebbert, Jon; Hays, J. Taylor; Haddock, C. Keith.

In: Health Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 5, 01.09.2007, p. 588-597.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Klesges, Robert ; Klesges, Lisa M. ; Vander Weg, Mark W. ; DeBon, Margaret ; Poston, Walker S.Carlos ; Ebbert, Jon ; Hays, J. Taylor ; Haddock, C. Keith. / Characteristics of Air Force Personnel Who Choose Pharmacological Aids for Smoking Cessation Following an Involuntary Tobacco Ban and Tobacco Control Program. In: Health Psychology. 2007 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 588-597.
@article{8a86feb02a8c4fb28f162750339a3f10,
title = "Characteristics of Air Force Personnel Who Choose Pharmacological Aids for Smoking Cessation Following an Involuntary Tobacco Ban and Tobacco Control Program",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study was to compare characteristics of smokers who did and did not report use of cessation aids as part of a tobacco control program in a military setting (n = 8994). Design: The study is a longitudinal epidemiological study where the relationship between smoking status at follow-up and use of pharmacologic aids to quit smoking were assessed. Main Outcome Measures: Smoking cessation, post baseline use of cessation aids to quit smoking. Results and Conclusions: Individuals remaining abstinent were 70{\%} less likely to have used NRT/pharmacological aids compared to those that relapsed. NRT/pharmacological aid users were more likely to report plans to smoke after military training, to have friends who smoke, and to accept a cigarette from a friend. NRT/pharmacological aid users were more likely to believe that using NRT was safer than smoking and to have engaged in harm reduction strategies. Our findings suggest that selection bias related to such characteristics may explain some of the discrepancies between effect sizes reported in efficacy compared to effectiveness studies of NRT and smoking outcomes currently reported in the literature.",
author = "Robert Klesges and Klesges, {Lisa M.} and {Vander Weg}, {Mark W.} and Margaret DeBon and Poston, {Walker S.Carlos} and Jon Ebbert and Hays, {J. Taylor} and Haddock, {C. Keith}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0278-6133.26.5.588",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "588--597",
journal = "Health Psychology",
issn = "0278-6133",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characteristics of Air Force Personnel Who Choose Pharmacological Aids for Smoking Cessation Following an Involuntary Tobacco Ban and Tobacco Control Program

AU - Klesges, Robert

AU - Klesges, Lisa M.

AU - Vander Weg, Mark W.

AU - DeBon, Margaret

AU - Poston, Walker S.Carlos

AU - Ebbert, Jon

AU - Hays, J. Taylor

AU - Haddock, C. Keith

PY - 2007/9/1

Y1 - 2007/9/1

N2 - Objective: The objective of this study was to compare characteristics of smokers who did and did not report use of cessation aids as part of a tobacco control program in a military setting (n = 8994). Design: The study is a longitudinal epidemiological study where the relationship between smoking status at follow-up and use of pharmacologic aids to quit smoking were assessed. Main Outcome Measures: Smoking cessation, post baseline use of cessation aids to quit smoking. Results and Conclusions: Individuals remaining abstinent were 70% less likely to have used NRT/pharmacological aids compared to those that relapsed. NRT/pharmacological aid users were more likely to report plans to smoke after military training, to have friends who smoke, and to accept a cigarette from a friend. NRT/pharmacological aid users were more likely to believe that using NRT was safer than smoking and to have engaged in harm reduction strategies. Our findings suggest that selection bias related to such characteristics may explain some of the discrepancies between effect sizes reported in efficacy compared to effectiveness studies of NRT and smoking outcomes currently reported in the literature.

AB - Objective: The objective of this study was to compare characteristics of smokers who did and did not report use of cessation aids as part of a tobacco control program in a military setting (n = 8994). Design: The study is a longitudinal epidemiological study where the relationship between smoking status at follow-up and use of pharmacologic aids to quit smoking were assessed. Main Outcome Measures: Smoking cessation, post baseline use of cessation aids to quit smoking. Results and Conclusions: Individuals remaining abstinent were 70% less likely to have used NRT/pharmacological aids compared to those that relapsed. NRT/pharmacological aid users were more likely to report plans to smoke after military training, to have friends who smoke, and to accept a cigarette from a friend. NRT/pharmacological aid users were more likely to believe that using NRT was safer than smoking and to have engaged in harm reduction strategies. Our findings suggest that selection bias related to such characteristics may explain some of the discrepancies between effect sizes reported in efficacy compared to effectiveness studies of NRT and smoking outcomes currently reported in the literature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34748867812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34748867812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0278-6133.26.5.588

DO - 10.1037/0278-6133.26.5.588

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 588

EP - 597

JO - Health Psychology

JF - Health Psychology

SN - 0278-6133

IS - 5

ER -