Clinical alignment variations in total knee arthroplasty with different navigation methods

Byron F. Stephens, Sam Hakki, Khaled J. Saleh, William Mihalko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We compared the resulting alignment in 90° of flexion and in full extension after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with two navigation systems using different techniques: a measured resection (MR) system and a gap - balancing (GB) system. Methods: Varus and valgus alignment in extension and flexion was compared in 100 consecutive patients who had TKA with an MR distal-femoral-cut-first technique at one institution and 100 consecutive patients in whom a GB tibial-cut-first technique was used at another institution. Alignment deviation of three degrees or more from neutral was considered an outlier. Results: No significant difference between the groups in coronal alignment in extension or flexion was found, but there were three times the number of outliers for clinical alignment in flexion for the MR group compared to the GB group. Conclusions: The use of the GB tibial-cut-first computer-assisted TKA navigation may provide a more consistent clinical alignment in flexion than systems using an MR technique. Level of evidence: Therapeutic study. Level 2.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)971-974
Number of pages4
JournalKnee
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Thigh
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Clinical alignment variations in total knee arthroplasty with different navigation methods. / Stephens, Byron F.; Hakki, Sam; Saleh, Khaled J.; Mihalko, William.

In: Knee, Vol. 21, No. 5, 01.10.2014, p. 971-974.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stephens, Byron F. ; Hakki, Sam ; Saleh, Khaled J. ; Mihalko, William. / Clinical alignment variations in total knee arthroplasty with different navigation methods. In: Knee. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 971-974.
@article{bfc843026b684b17a3290d49c5f2b1a7,
title = "Clinical alignment variations in total knee arthroplasty with different navigation methods",
abstract = "Background: We compared the resulting alignment in 90° of flexion and in full extension after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with two navigation systems using different techniques: a measured resection (MR) system and a gap - balancing (GB) system. Methods: Varus and valgus alignment in extension and flexion was compared in 100 consecutive patients who had TKA with an MR distal-femoral-cut-first technique at one institution and 100 consecutive patients in whom a GB tibial-cut-first technique was used at another institution. Alignment deviation of three degrees or more from neutral was considered an outlier. Results: No significant difference between the groups in coronal alignment in extension or flexion was found, but there were three times the number of outliers for clinical alignment in flexion for the MR group compared to the GB group. Conclusions: The use of the GB tibial-cut-first computer-assisted TKA navigation may provide a more consistent clinical alignment in flexion than systems using an MR technique. Level of evidence: Therapeutic study. Level 2.",
author = "Stephens, {Byron F.} and Sam Hakki and Saleh, {Khaled J.} and William Mihalko",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.knee.2014.03.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "971--974",
journal = "Knee",
issn = "0968-0160",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical alignment variations in total knee arthroplasty with different navigation methods

AU - Stephens, Byron F.

AU - Hakki, Sam

AU - Saleh, Khaled J.

AU - Mihalko, William

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - Background: We compared the resulting alignment in 90° of flexion and in full extension after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with two navigation systems using different techniques: a measured resection (MR) system and a gap - balancing (GB) system. Methods: Varus and valgus alignment in extension and flexion was compared in 100 consecutive patients who had TKA with an MR distal-femoral-cut-first technique at one institution and 100 consecutive patients in whom a GB tibial-cut-first technique was used at another institution. Alignment deviation of three degrees or more from neutral was considered an outlier. Results: No significant difference between the groups in coronal alignment in extension or flexion was found, but there were three times the number of outliers for clinical alignment in flexion for the MR group compared to the GB group. Conclusions: The use of the GB tibial-cut-first computer-assisted TKA navigation may provide a more consistent clinical alignment in flexion than systems using an MR technique. Level of evidence: Therapeutic study. Level 2.

AB - Background: We compared the resulting alignment in 90° of flexion and in full extension after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with two navigation systems using different techniques: a measured resection (MR) system and a gap - balancing (GB) system. Methods: Varus and valgus alignment in extension and flexion was compared in 100 consecutive patients who had TKA with an MR distal-femoral-cut-first technique at one institution and 100 consecutive patients in whom a GB tibial-cut-first technique was used at another institution. Alignment deviation of three degrees or more from neutral was considered an outlier. Results: No significant difference between the groups in coronal alignment in extension or flexion was found, but there were three times the number of outliers for clinical alignment in flexion for the MR group compared to the GB group. Conclusions: The use of the GB tibial-cut-first computer-assisted TKA navigation may provide a more consistent clinical alignment in flexion than systems using an MR technique. Level of evidence: Therapeutic study. Level 2.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908509214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908509214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.knee.2014.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.knee.2014.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 971

EP - 974

JO - Knee

JF - Knee

SN - 0968-0160

IS - 5

ER -