Clinical studies of fiber posts: A literature review

Maria C. Cagidiaco, Cecilia Goracci, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Marco Ferrari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

119 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This literature review aimed to find answers to relevant questions regarding the clinical outcome of endontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts. Materials and Methods: All clinical studies published since 1990 in journals indexed in MEDLINE were retrieved by searching PubMed with the query terms "fiber posts and clinical studies." The reference list of the collected articles was also screened for further relevant citations. The strength of the evidence provided by the reviewed papers was assessed according to the criteria of evidence-based dentistry. Results: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on fiber posts have been published in peerreviewed journals. A meta-analysis is not applicable to these studies since they do not address the same specific clinical question. Retrospective and prospective trials without controls are also available. Conclusions: Two RCTs indicate that fiberreinforced composite posts outperform metal posts in the restoration of endontically treated teeth. However, this evidence cannot be considered as conclusive. Longerterm RCTs would be desirable. The placement of a fiber-reinforced composite post protects against failure, especially under conditions of extensive coronal destruction. The most common type of failure with fiber-reinforced composite posts is debonding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)328-336
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Prosthodontics
Volume21
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trials
Tooth
Evidence-Based Dentistry
PubMed
MEDLINE
Meta-Analysis
Metals
Clinical Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Cagidiaco, M. C., Goracci, C., Garcia-Godoy, F., & Ferrari, M. (2008). Clinical studies of fiber posts: A literature review. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 21(4), 328-336.

Clinical studies of fiber posts : A literature review. / Cagidiaco, Maria C.; Goracci, Cecilia; Garcia-Godoy, Franklin; Ferrari, Marco.

In: International Journal of Prosthodontics, Vol. 21, No. 4, 01.07.2008, p. 328-336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cagidiaco, MC, Goracci, C, Garcia-Godoy, F & Ferrari, M 2008, 'Clinical studies of fiber posts: A literature review', International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 328-336.
Cagidiaco, Maria C. ; Goracci, Cecilia ; Garcia-Godoy, Franklin ; Ferrari, Marco. / Clinical studies of fiber posts : A literature review. In: International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2008 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 328-336.
@article{1ca74894a27444549b0b0fc8675d3cf6,
title = "Clinical studies of fiber posts: A literature review",
abstract = "Purpose: This literature review aimed to find answers to relevant questions regarding the clinical outcome of endontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts. Materials and Methods: All clinical studies published since 1990 in journals indexed in MEDLINE were retrieved by searching PubMed with the query terms {"}fiber posts and clinical studies.{"} The reference list of the collected articles was also screened for further relevant citations. The strength of the evidence provided by the reviewed papers was assessed according to the criteria of evidence-based dentistry. Results: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on fiber posts have been published in peerreviewed journals. A meta-analysis is not applicable to these studies since they do not address the same specific clinical question. Retrospective and prospective trials without controls are also available. Conclusions: Two RCTs indicate that fiberreinforced composite posts outperform metal posts in the restoration of endontically treated teeth. However, this evidence cannot be considered as conclusive. Longerterm RCTs would be desirable. The placement of a fiber-reinforced composite post protects against failure, especially under conditions of extensive coronal destruction. The most common type of failure with fiber-reinforced composite posts is debonding.",
author = "Cagidiaco, {Maria C.} and Cecilia Goracci and Franklin Garcia-Godoy and Marco Ferrari",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "328--336",
journal = "International Journal of Prosthodontics",
issn = "0893-2174",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical studies of fiber posts

T2 - A literature review

AU - Cagidiaco, Maria C.

AU - Goracci, Cecilia

AU - Garcia-Godoy, Franklin

AU - Ferrari, Marco

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

N2 - Purpose: This literature review aimed to find answers to relevant questions regarding the clinical outcome of endontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts. Materials and Methods: All clinical studies published since 1990 in journals indexed in MEDLINE were retrieved by searching PubMed with the query terms "fiber posts and clinical studies." The reference list of the collected articles was also screened for further relevant citations. The strength of the evidence provided by the reviewed papers was assessed according to the criteria of evidence-based dentistry. Results: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on fiber posts have been published in peerreviewed journals. A meta-analysis is not applicable to these studies since they do not address the same specific clinical question. Retrospective and prospective trials without controls are also available. Conclusions: Two RCTs indicate that fiberreinforced composite posts outperform metal posts in the restoration of endontically treated teeth. However, this evidence cannot be considered as conclusive. Longerterm RCTs would be desirable. The placement of a fiber-reinforced composite post protects against failure, especially under conditions of extensive coronal destruction. The most common type of failure with fiber-reinforced composite posts is debonding.

AB - Purpose: This literature review aimed to find answers to relevant questions regarding the clinical outcome of endontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts. Materials and Methods: All clinical studies published since 1990 in journals indexed in MEDLINE were retrieved by searching PubMed with the query terms "fiber posts and clinical studies." The reference list of the collected articles was also screened for further relevant citations. The strength of the evidence provided by the reviewed papers was assessed according to the criteria of evidence-based dentistry. Results: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on fiber posts have been published in peerreviewed journals. A meta-analysis is not applicable to these studies since they do not address the same specific clinical question. Retrospective and prospective trials without controls are also available. Conclusions: Two RCTs indicate that fiberreinforced composite posts outperform metal posts in the restoration of endontically treated teeth. However, this evidence cannot be considered as conclusive. Longerterm RCTs would be desirable. The placement of a fiber-reinforced composite post protects against failure, especially under conditions of extensive coronal destruction. The most common type of failure with fiber-reinforced composite posts is debonding.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48749100684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48749100684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18717092

AN - SCOPUS:48749100684

VL - 21

SP - 328

EP - 336

JO - International Journal of Prosthodontics

JF - International Journal of Prosthodontics

SN - 0893-2174

IS - 4

ER -