Comparison of 2D Radiographic Images and 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Positioning Head-and-Neck Radiotherapy Patients

Heng Li, X. Ronald Zhu, Lifei Zhang, Lei Dong, Sam Tung, Anesa Ahamad, K. S.Clifford Chao, William H. Morrison, David I. Rosenthal, David Schwartz, Radhe Mohan, Adam S. Garden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the positioning accuracy using two-dimensional kilovoltage (2DkV) imaging and three-dimensional cone beam CT (CBCT) in patients with head and neck (H&N) cancer receiving radiation therapy. To assess the benefit of patient-specific headrest. Materials and Methods: All 21 patients studied were immobilized using thermoplastic masks with either a patient-specific vacuum bag (11 of 21, IMA) or standard clear plastic (10 of 21, IMB) headrests. Each patient was imaged with a pair of orthogonal 2DkV images in treatment position using onboard imaging before the CBCT procedure. The 2DkV and CBCT images were acquired weekly during the same session. The 2DkV images were reviewed by oncologists and also analyzed by a software tool based on mutual information (MI). Results: Ninety-eight pairs of assessable 2DkV-CBCT alignment sets were obtained. Systematic and random errors were <1.6 mm for both 2DkV and CBCT alignments. When we compared shifts determined by CBCT and 2DkV for the same patient setup, statistically significant correlations were observed in all three major directions. Among all CBCT couch shifts, 4.1% ≥ 0.5 cm and 18.7% ≥ 0.3 cm, whereas among all 2DkV (MI) shifts, 1.7% ≥ 0.5 cm and 11.2% ≥ 0.3 cm. Statistically significant difference was found on anteroposterior direction between IMA and IMB with the CBCT alignment only. Conclusions: The differences between 2D and 3D alignments were mainly caused by the relative flexibility of certain H&N structures and possibly by rotation. Better immobilization of the flexible neck is required to further reduce the setup errors for H&N patients receiving radiotherapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)916-925
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume71
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2008

Fingerprint

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
positioning
radiation therapy
cones
Neck
Radiotherapy
tomography
Head
alignment
shift
Three-Dimensional Imaging
couches
Masks
Vacuum
software development tools
random errors
bags
Immobilization
Plastics
immobilization

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiation
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Comparison of 2D Radiographic Images and 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Positioning Head-and-Neck Radiotherapy Patients. / Li, Heng; Zhu, X. Ronald; Zhang, Lifei; Dong, Lei; Tung, Sam; Ahamad, Anesa; Chao, K. S.Clifford; Morrison, William H.; Rosenthal, David I.; Schwartz, David; Mohan, Radhe; Garden, Adam S.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 71, No. 3, 01.07.2008, p. 916-925.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, Heng ; Zhu, X. Ronald ; Zhang, Lifei ; Dong, Lei ; Tung, Sam ; Ahamad, Anesa ; Chao, K. S.Clifford ; Morrison, William H. ; Rosenthal, David I. ; Schwartz, David ; Mohan, Radhe ; Garden, Adam S. / Comparison of 2D Radiographic Images and 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Positioning Head-and-Neck Radiotherapy Patients. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2008 ; Vol. 71, No. 3. pp. 916-925.
@article{d823843219d4418eb2135e97900e431d,
title = "Comparison of 2D Radiographic Images and 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Positioning Head-and-Neck Radiotherapy Patients",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the positioning accuracy using two-dimensional kilovoltage (2DkV) imaging and three-dimensional cone beam CT (CBCT) in patients with head and neck (H&N) cancer receiving radiation therapy. To assess the benefit of patient-specific headrest. Materials and Methods: All 21 patients studied were immobilized using thermoplastic masks with either a patient-specific vacuum bag (11 of 21, IMA) or standard clear plastic (10 of 21, IMB) headrests. Each patient was imaged with a pair of orthogonal 2DkV images in treatment position using onboard imaging before the CBCT procedure. The 2DkV and CBCT images were acquired weekly during the same session. The 2DkV images were reviewed by oncologists and also analyzed by a software tool based on mutual information (MI). Results: Ninety-eight pairs of assessable 2DkV-CBCT alignment sets were obtained. Systematic and random errors were <1.6 mm for both 2DkV and CBCT alignments. When we compared shifts determined by CBCT and 2DkV for the same patient setup, statistically significant correlations were observed in all three major directions. Among all CBCT couch shifts, 4.1{\%} ≥ 0.5 cm and 18.7{\%} ≥ 0.3 cm, whereas among all 2DkV (MI) shifts, 1.7{\%} ≥ 0.5 cm and 11.2{\%} ≥ 0.3 cm. Statistically significant difference was found on anteroposterior direction between IMA and IMB with the CBCT alignment only. Conclusions: The differences between 2D and 3D alignments were mainly caused by the relative flexibility of certain H&N structures and possibly by rotation. Better immobilization of the flexible neck is required to further reduce the setup errors for H&N patients receiving radiotherapy.",
author = "Heng Li and Zhu, {X. Ronald} and Lifei Zhang and Lei Dong and Sam Tung and Anesa Ahamad and Chao, {K. S.Clifford} and Morrison, {William H.} and Rosenthal, {David I.} and David Schwartz and Radhe Mohan and Garden, {Adam S.}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.01.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "916--925",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 2D Radiographic Images and 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Positioning Head-and-Neck Radiotherapy Patients

AU - Li, Heng

AU - Zhu, X. Ronald

AU - Zhang, Lifei

AU - Dong, Lei

AU - Tung, Sam

AU - Ahamad, Anesa

AU - Chao, K. S.Clifford

AU - Morrison, William H.

AU - Rosenthal, David I.

AU - Schwartz, David

AU - Mohan, Radhe

AU - Garden, Adam S.

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

N2 - Purpose: To assess the positioning accuracy using two-dimensional kilovoltage (2DkV) imaging and three-dimensional cone beam CT (CBCT) in patients with head and neck (H&N) cancer receiving radiation therapy. To assess the benefit of patient-specific headrest. Materials and Methods: All 21 patients studied were immobilized using thermoplastic masks with either a patient-specific vacuum bag (11 of 21, IMA) or standard clear plastic (10 of 21, IMB) headrests. Each patient was imaged with a pair of orthogonal 2DkV images in treatment position using onboard imaging before the CBCT procedure. The 2DkV and CBCT images were acquired weekly during the same session. The 2DkV images were reviewed by oncologists and also analyzed by a software tool based on mutual information (MI). Results: Ninety-eight pairs of assessable 2DkV-CBCT alignment sets were obtained. Systematic and random errors were <1.6 mm for both 2DkV and CBCT alignments. When we compared shifts determined by CBCT and 2DkV for the same patient setup, statistically significant correlations were observed in all three major directions. Among all CBCT couch shifts, 4.1% ≥ 0.5 cm and 18.7% ≥ 0.3 cm, whereas among all 2DkV (MI) shifts, 1.7% ≥ 0.5 cm and 11.2% ≥ 0.3 cm. Statistically significant difference was found on anteroposterior direction between IMA and IMB with the CBCT alignment only. Conclusions: The differences between 2D and 3D alignments were mainly caused by the relative flexibility of certain H&N structures and possibly by rotation. Better immobilization of the flexible neck is required to further reduce the setup errors for H&N patients receiving radiotherapy.

AB - Purpose: To assess the positioning accuracy using two-dimensional kilovoltage (2DkV) imaging and three-dimensional cone beam CT (CBCT) in patients with head and neck (H&N) cancer receiving radiation therapy. To assess the benefit of patient-specific headrest. Materials and Methods: All 21 patients studied were immobilized using thermoplastic masks with either a patient-specific vacuum bag (11 of 21, IMA) or standard clear plastic (10 of 21, IMB) headrests. Each patient was imaged with a pair of orthogonal 2DkV images in treatment position using onboard imaging before the CBCT procedure. The 2DkV and CBCT images were acquired weekly during the same session. The 2DkV images were reviewed by oncologists and also analyzed by a software tool based on mutual information (MI). Results: Ninety-eight pairs of assessable 2DkV-CBCT alignment sets were obtained. Systematic and random errors were <1.6 mm for both 2DkV and CBCT alignments. When we compared shifts determined by CBCT and 2DkV for the same patient setup, statistically significant correlations were observed in all three major directions. Among all CBCT couch shifts, 4.1% ≥ 0.5 cm and 18.7% ≥ 0.3 cm, whereas among all 2DkV (MI) shifts, 1.7% ≥ 0.5 cm and 11.2% ≥ 0.3 cm. Statistically significant difference was found on anteroposterior direction between IMA and IMB with the CBCT alignment only. Conclusions: The differences between 2D and 3D alignments were mainly caused by the relative flexibility of certain H&N structures and possibly by rotation. Better immobilization of the flexible neck is required to further reduce the setup errors for H&N patients receiving radiotherapy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44449171854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44449171854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.01.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.01.008

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 916

EP - 925

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 3

ER -