Comparison of bacteria isolated from emergency department patients versus hospitalized patients

Heather M. Draper, Joseph B. Farland, Robert Heidel, Larissa S. May, Katie J. Suda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. The frequencies and corresponding susceptibilities of bacteria isolated from patients in the emergency department (ED) were compared with those from hospitalized patients. Methods. A microbiology laboratory report of all positive bacterial cultures obtained in the ED, regardless of the source (e.g., blood, urine, sputum), was obtained. In the case of duplicate cultures, only the first isolate cultured from a single patient was included. Colonization-site cultures (e.g., nasal swabs) and culture reports identified by the laboratory as contaminant organisms were excluded from the evaluation. Antimicrobial susceptibility results were then compiled into a standardized ED-specific antibiogram. Antimicrobial susceptibilities for each pathogen in the ED antibiogram were compared with those in the hospitalwide antibiogram. If there was a difference of ≥5% between the susceptibility of a single antimicrobial agent, chi-square tests were conducted, and unadjusted odds ratios were calculated. Pathogens with fewer than 30 isolates were excluded from the susceptibility comparison. Results. A total of 3140 cultures were evaluated (1417 from the ED, 1723 from the hospital). The frequencies of pathogens isolated in the ED and hospitalwide were similar, with the exception of Escherichia coli, which were more commonly isolated in ED patients, and Enterococcus species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which were more common in hospitalized patients. Significant differences in susceptibility profiles were identified for Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Enterococcus faecalis, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa. Conclusion. Significant differences in the frequencies of bacteria isolated and corresponding susceptibilities were found in cultures obtained in ED patients compared with those obtained in hospitalized patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2124-2128
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
Volume70
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Bacteria
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Escherichia coli
Enterococcus faecalis
Coagulase
Enterococcus
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Chi-Square Distribution
Anti-Infective Agents
Microbiology
Sputum
Staphylococcus
Nose
Staphylococcus aureus
Odds Ratio
Urine

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pharmacology
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Comparison of bacteria isolated from emergency department patients versus hospitalized patients. / Draper, Heather M.; Farland, Joseph B.; Heidel, Robert; May, Larissa S.; Suda, Katie J.

In: American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 70, No. 23, 01.12.2013, p. 2124-2128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Draper, Heather M. ; Farland, Joseph B. ; Heidel, Robert ; May, Larissa S. ; Suda, Katie J. / Comparison of bacteria isolated from emergency department patients versus hospitalized patients. In: American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2013 ; Vol. 70, No. 23. pp. 2124-2128.
@article{31c68c3d635a4445b9153cc933ce234f,
title = "Comparison of bacteria isolated from emergency department patients versus hospitalized patients",
abstract = "Purpose. The frequencies and corresponding susceptibilities of bacteria isolated from patients in the emergency department (ED) were compared with those from hospitalized patients. Methods. A microbiology laboratory report of all positive bacterial cultures obtained in the ED, regardless of the source (e.g., blood, urine, sputum), was obtained. In the case of duplicate cultures, only the first isolate cultured from a single patient was included. Colonization-site cultures (e.g., nasal swabs) and culture reports identified by the laboratory as contaminant organisms were excluded from the evaluation. Antimicrobial susceptibility results were then compiled into a standardized ED-specific antibiogram. Antimicrobial susceptibilities for each pathogen in the ED antibiogram were compared with those in the hospitalwide antibiogram. If there was a difference of ≥5{\%} between the susceptibility of a single antimicrobial agent, chi-square tests were conducted, and unadjusted odds ratios were calculated. Pathogens with fewer than 30 isolates were excluded from the susceptibility comparison. Results. A total of 3140 cultures were evaluated (1417 from the ED, 1723 from the hospital). The frequencies of pathogens isolated in the ED and hospitalwide were similar, with the exception of Escherichia coli, which were more commonly isolated in ED patients, and Enterococcus species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which were more common in hospitalized patients. Significant differences in susceptibility profiles were identified for Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Enterococcus faecalis, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa. Conclusion. Significant differences in the frequencies of bacteria isolated and corresponding susceptibilities were found in cultures obtained in ED patients compared with those obtained in hospitalized patients.",
author = "Draper, {Heather M.} and Farland, {Joseph B.} and Robert Heidel and May, {Larissa S.} and Suda, {Katie J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2146/ajhp130079",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "2124--2128",
journal = "American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy",
issn = "1079-2082",
publisher = "American Society of Health-Systems Pharmacy",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of bacteria isolated from emergency department patients versus hospitalized patients

AU - Draper, Heather M.

AU - Farland, Joseph B.

AU - Heidel, Robert

AU - May, Larissa S.

AU - Suda, Katie J.

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - Purpose. The frequencies and corresponding susceptibilities of bacteria isolated from patients in the emergency department (ED) were compared with those from hospitalized patients. Methods. A microbiology laboratory report of all positive bacterial cultures obtained in the ED, regardless of the source (e.g., blood, urine, sputum), was obtained. In the case of duplicate cultures, only the first isolate cultured from a single patient was included. Colonization-site cultures (e.g., nasal swabs) and culture reports identified by the laboratory as contaminant organisms were excluded from the evaluation. Antimicrobial susceptibility results were then compiled into a standardized ED-specific antibiogram. Antimicrobial susceptibilities for each pathogen in the ED antibiogram were compared with those in the hospitalwide antibiogram. If there was a difference of ≥5% between the susceptibility of a single antimicrobial agent, chi-square tests were conducted, and unadjusted odds ratios were calculated. Pathogens with fewer than 30 isolates were excluded from the susceptibility comparison. Results. A total of 3140 cultures were evaluated (1417 from the ED, 1723 from the hospital). The frequencies of pathogens isolated in the ED and hospitalwide were similar, with the exception of Escherichia coli, which were more commonly isolated in ED patients, and Enterococcus species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which were more common in hospitalized patients. Significant differences in susceptibility profiles were identified for Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Enterococcus faecalis, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa. Conclusion. Significant differences in the frequencies of bacteria isolated and corresponding susceptibilities were found in cultures obtained in ED patients compared with those obtained in hospitalized patients.

AB - Purpose. The frequencies and corresponding susceptibilities of bacteria isolated from patients in the emergency department (ED) were compared with those from hospitalized patients. Methods. A microbiology laboratory report of all positive bacterial cultures obtained in the ED, regardless of the source (e.g., blood, urine, sputum), was obtained. In the case of duplicate cultures, only the first isolate cultured from a single patient was included. Colonization-site cultures (e.g., nasal swabs) and culture reports identified by the laboratory as contaminant organisms were excluded from the evaluation. Antimicrobial susceptibility results were then compiled into a standardized ED-specific antibiogram. Antimicrobial susceptibilities for each pathogen in the ED antibiogram were compared with those in the hospitalwide antibiogram. If there was a difference of ≥5% between the susceptibility of a single antimicrobial agent, chi-square tests were conducted, and unadjusted odds ratios were calculated. Pathogens with fewer than 30 isolates were excluded from the susceptibility comparison. Results. A total of 3140 cultures were evaluated (1417 from the ED, 1723 from the hospital). The frequencies of pathogens isolated in the ED and hospitalwide were similar, with the exception of Escherichia coli, which were more commonly isolated in ED patients, and Enterococcus species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which were more common in hospitalized patients. Significant differences in susceptibility profiles were identified for Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Enterococcus faecalis, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa. Conclusion. Significant differences in the frequencies of bacteria isolated and corresponding susceptibilities were found in cultures obtained in ED patients compared with those obtained in hospitalized patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904711044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904711044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2146/ajhp130079

DO - 10.2146/ajhp130079

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 2124

EP - 2128

JO - American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy

JF - American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy

SN - 1079-2082

IS - 23

ER -