Comparison of radiographic and anatomic distal metatarsal articular angle in cadaver feet

James R. Jastifer, Michael J. Coughlin, Shane Schutt, Christopher Hirose, Michael Kennedy, Brett Grebing, Bertil Smith, Truitt Cooper, Pau Golano, Ramon Viladot, Jesse Doty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: A few studies report correlations between radiographic and anatomic measurements of the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA). However, little is known about how the DMAA correlates with the hallux valgus angle (HVA) and with anatomic and clinical radiographic measurements. Methods: We dissected, measured, and radiographed 39 cadaveric feet for evidence of hallux valgus and the DMAA. We then correlated these values with paired clinical radiographic measurements made by physician evaluators. Results: Physician measurement of DMAA and anatomic measurement of DMAA were significantly correlated with a mean r = 0.64 (evaluator range, 0.44-0.66). Pairwise correlation between physician evaluators ranged from r = 0.63 to 0.84. Sixty-six percent of physician-measured DMAAs were within 5 degrees of anatomic DMAA. Conclusion: The percentage of radiographic DMAAs that were within 5 degrees of anatomic DMAAs was only 66%. Additionally, the DMAA was increased in the specimens with moderate and severe hallux valgus compared with those with normal or mild hallux valgus angles. Clinical Relevance: The DMAA is an important consideration in patients with hallux valgus. While it is less reliable than other radiographic measures, it was correlated to deformity severity in specimen with hallux valgus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)389-393
Number of pages5
JournalFoot and Ankle International
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Metatarsal Bones
Hallux Valgus
Cadaver
Foot
Joints
Physicians

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of radiographic and anatomic distal metatarsal articular angle in cadaver feet. / Jastifer, James R.; Coughlin, Michael J.; Schutt, Shane; Hirose, Christopher; Kennedy, Michael; Grebing, Brett; Smith, Bertil; Cooper, Truitt; Golano, Pau; Viladot, Ramon; Doty, Jesse.

In: Foot and Ankle International, Vol. 35, No. 4, 01.01.2014, p. 389-393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jastifer, JR, Coughlin, MJ, Schutt, S, Hirose, C, Kennedy, M, Grebing, B, Smith, B, Cooper, T, Golano, P, Viladot, R & Doty, J 2014, 'Comparison of radiographic and anatomic distal metatarsal articular angle in cadaver feet', Foot and Ankle International, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 389-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100714522027
Jastifer, James R. ; Coughlin, Michael J. ; Schutt, Shane ; Hirose, Christopher ; Kennedy, Michael ; Grebing, Brett ; Smith, Bertil ; Cooper, Truitt ; Golano, Pau ; Viladot, Ramon ; Doty, Jesse. / Comparison of radiographic and anatomic distal metatarsal articular angle in cadaver feet. In: Foot and Ankle International. 2014 ; Vol. 35, No. 4. pp. 389-393.
@article{df2a679628764534b5252cd918448f56,
title = "Comparison of radiographic and anatomic distal metatarsal articular angle in cadaver feet",
abstract = "Background: A few studies report correlations between radiographic and anatomic measurements of the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA). However, little is known about how the DMAA correlates with the hallux valgus angle (HVA) and with anatomic and clinical radiographic measurements. Methods: We dissected, measured, and radiographed 39 cadaveric feet for evidence of hallux valgus and the DMAA. We then correlated these values with paired clinical radiographic measurements made by physician evaluators. Results: Physician measurement of DMAA and anatomic measurement of DMAA were significantly correlated with a mean r = 0.64 (evaluator range, 0.44-0.66). Pairwise correlation between physician evaluators ranged from r = 0.63 to 0.84. Sixty-six percent of physician-measured DMAAs were within 5 degrees of anatomic DMAA. Conclusion: The percentage of radiographic DMAAs that were within 5 degrees of anatomic DMAAs was only 66{\%}. Additionally, the DMAA was increased in the specimens with moderate and severe hallux valgus compared with those with normal or mild hallux valgus angles. Clinical Relevance: The DMAA is an important consideration in patients with hallux valgus. While it is less reliable than other radiographic measures, it was correlated to deformity severity in specimen with hallux valgus.",
author = "Jastifer, {James R.} and Coughlin, {Michael J.} and Shane Schutt and Christopher Hirose and Michael Kennedy and Brett Grebing and Bertil Smith and Truitt Cooper and Pau Golano and Ramon Viladot and Jesse Doty",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1071100714522027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "389--393",
journal = "Foot and Ankle International",
issn = "1071-1007",
publisher = "AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of radiographic and anatomic distal metatarsal articular angle in cadaver feet

AU - Jastifer, James R.

AU - Coughlin, Michael J.

AU - Schutt, Shane

AU - Hirose, Christopher

AU - Kennedy, Michael

AU - Grebing, Brett

AU - Smith, Bertil

AU - Cooper, Truitt

AU - Golano, Pau

AU - Viladot, Ramon

AU - Doty, Jesse

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Background: A few studies report correlations between radiographic and anatomic measurements of the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA). However, little is known about how the DMAA correlates with the hallux valgus angle (HVA) and with anatomic and clinical radiographic measurements. Methods: We dissected, measured, and radiographed 39 cadaveric feet for evidence of hallux valgus and the DMAA. We then correlated these values with paired clinical radiographic measurements made by physician evaluators. Results: Physician measurement of DMAA and anatomic measurement of DMAA were significantly correlated with a mean r = 0.64 (evaluator range, 0.44-0.66). Pairwise correlation between physician evaluators ranged from r = 0.63 to 0.84. Sixty-six percent of physician-measured DMAAs were within 5 degrees of anatomic DMAA. Conclusion: The percentage of radiographic DMAAs that were within 5 degrees of anatomic DMAAs was only 66%. Additionally, the DMAA was increased in the specimens with moderate and severe hallux valgus compared with those with normal or mild hallux valgus angles. Clinical Relevance: The DMAA is an important consideration in patients with hallux valgus. While it is less reliable than other radiographic measures, it was correlated to deformity severity in specimen with hallux valgus.

AB - Background: A few studies report correlations between radiographic and anatomic measurements of the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA). However, little is known about how the DMAA correlates with the hallux valgus angle (HVA) and with anatomic and clinical radiographic measurements. Methods: We dissected, measured, and radiographed 39 cadaveric feet for evidence of hallux valgus and the DMAA. We then correlated these values with paired clinical radiographic measurements made by physician evaluators. Results: Physician measurement of DMAA and anatomic measurement of DMAA were significantly correlated with a mean r = 0.64 (evaluator range, 0.44-0.66). Pairwise correlation between physician evaluators ranged from r = 0.63 to 0.84. Sixty-six percent of physician-measured DMAAs were within 5 degrees of anatomic DMAA. Conclusion: The percentage of radiographic DMAAs that were within 5 degrees of anatomic DMAAs was only 66%. Additionally, the DMAA was increased in the specimens with moderate and severe hallux valgus compared with those with normal or mild hallux valgus angles. Clinical Relevance: The DMAA is an important consideration in patients with hallux valgus. While it is less reliable than other radiographic measures, it was correlated to deformity severity in specimen with hallux valgus.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899025982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899025982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1071100714522027

DO - 10.1177/1071100714522027

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 389

EP - 393

JO - Foot and Ankle International

JF - Foot and Ankle International

SN - 1071-1007

IS - 4

ER -