Comparison of total body tissue interface pressure of specialized pressure-relieving mattresses

William Hickerson, George M. Slugocki, Reuben L. Thaker, Robert Duncan, John F. Bishop, Judy K. Parks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. The pressure-relieving ability of three specialized support surface mattresses was investigated and compared to a standard hospital mattress by measuring total body tissue interface pressure in a laboratory experiment designed to simulate clinical conditions predisposing to formation of pressure ulcers. Summary Background Data. Pressure ulcers are commonly seen in the elderly; in patients with trauma, burns, spinal cord injury, neurological deficits, peripheral vascular disease, and stroke; and in other patient groups with debilitating or emaciating illness. They represent from 4 to 29% of all hospital admissions. This study was undertaken to compare three different types of specialty beds to a standard hospital mattress in order to find a mattress that prevents the occurrence of pressure ulcers. Methods. The tested beds and mattresses were the Orthoderm™ Convertible II (Bio-Clinic Inc., Ontario, Canada) low air-loss mattress on a Stryker® PMS (Stryker Inc., Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) bed; the FluidAir Elite® (KCI Inc., San Antonio, Texas, USA) air-fluidized bed; the Pegasus Airwave™ mattress (Pegasus Airwave Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, USA) on a Stryker PMS bed; and a standard hospital mattress on a Stryker PMS bed. The nineteen test subjects were all healthy with exclusion criteria of spinal cord injury, immobility, or other neurological or physical impairment. The Force Management System™ (Numotech Inc., Northridge, California, USA) was used to measure tissue interface pressure. Results: The study data show that the Pegasus Airwave mattress total surface pressure values of the anatomical regions (total body, torso, hips) of the body are lower than those of the other three tested mattresses. The total body and hip pressure resulting from pressure maturation is significantly less on the Pegasus Airwave mattress than on to the hospital bed, the air-fluidized bed, and the low air-loss bed. Conclusions: The Pegasus Airwave mattress outperforms the other tested support surfaces by decreasing overall pressure. Therefore, the Pegasus Airwave mattress is an excellent addition to augment nursing care in the prevention and treatment of pressure sores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-93
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 7 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tissue
Pressure
Hospital beds
Pressure Ulcer
Air
Fluidized beds
Nursing
Spinal Cord Injuries
Hip
Torso
Body Regions
Peripheral Vascular Diseases
Ontario
Nursing Care
Burns
Canada

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Comparison of total body tissue interface pressure of specialized pressure-relieving mattresses. / Hickerson, William; Slugocki, George M.; Thaker, Reuben L.; Duncan, Robert; Bishop, John F.; Parks, Judy K.

In: Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol. 14, No. 2, 07.06.2004, p. 81-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hickerson, William ; Slugocki, George M. ; Thaker, Reuben L. ; Duncan, Robert ; Bishop, John F. ; Parks, Judy K. / Comparison of total body tissue interface pressure of specialized pressure-relieving mattresses. In: Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants. 2004 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 81-93.
@article{3a05980979e34400a8f2b6c7fe015ee6,
title = "Comparison of total body tissue interface pressure of specialized pressure-relieving mattresses",
abstract = "Objective. The pressure-relieving ability of three specialized support surface mattresses was investigated and compared to a standard hospital mattress by measuring total body tissue interface pressure in a laboratory experiment designed to simulate clinical conditions predisposing to formation of pressure ulcers. Summary Background Data. Pressure ulcers are commonly seen in the elderly; in patients with trauma, burns, spinal cord injury, neurological deficits, peripheral vascular disease, and stroke; and in other patient groups with debilitating or emaciating illness. They represent from 4 to 29{\%} of all hospital admissions. This study was undertaken to compare three different types of specialty beds to a standard hospital mattress in order to find a mattress that prevents the occurrence of pressure ulcers. Methods. The tested beds and mattresses were the Orthoderm™ Convertible II (Bio-Clinic Inc., Ontario, Canada) low air-loss mattress on a Stryker{\circledR} PMS (Stryker Inc., Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) bed; the FluidAir Elite{\circledR} (KCI Inc., San Antonio, Texas, USA) air-fluidized bed; the Pegasus Airwave™ mattress (Pegasus Airwave Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, USA) on a Stryker PMS bed; and a standard hospital mattress on a Stryker PMS bed. The nineteen test subjects were all healthy with exclusion criteria of spinal cord injury, immobility, or other neurological or physical impairment. The Force Management System™ (Numotech Inc., Northridge, California, USA) was used to measure tissue interface pressure. Results: The study data show that the Pegasus Airwave mattress total surface pressure values of the anatomical regions (total body, torso, hips) of the body are lower than those of the other three tested mattresses. The total body and hip pressure resulting from pressure maturation is significantly less on the Pegasus Airwave mattress than on to the hospital bed, the air-fluidized bed, and the low air-loss bed. Conclusions: The Pegasus Airwave mattress outperforms the other tested support surfaces by decreasing overall pressure. Therefore, the Pegasus Airwave mattress is an excellent addition to augment nursing care in the prevention and treatment of pressure sores.",
author = "William Hickerson and Slugocki, {George M.} and Thaker, {Reuben L.} and Robert Duncan and Bishop, {John F.} and Parks, {Judy K.}",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v14.i2.20",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "81--93",
journal = "Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants",
issn = "1050-6934",
publisher = "Begell House Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of total body tissue interface pressure of specialized pressure-relieving mattresses

AU - Hickerson, William

AU - Slugocki, George M.

AU - Thaker, Reuben L.

AU - Duncan, Robert

AU - Bishop, John F.

AU - Parks, Judy K.

PY - 2004/6/7

Y1 - 2004/6/7

N2 - Objective. The pressure-relieving ability of three specialized support surface mattresses was investigated and compared to a standard hospital mattress by measuring total body tissue interface pressure in a laboratory experiment designed to simulate clinical conditions predisposing to formation of pressure ulcers. Summary Background Data. Pressure ulcers are commonly seen in the elderly; in patients with trauma, burns, spinal cord injury, neurological deficits, peripheral vascular disease, and stroke; and in other patient groups with debilitating or emaciating illness. They represent from 4 to 29% of all hospital admissions. This study was undertaken to compare three different types of specialty beds to a standard hospital mattress in order to find a mattress that prevents the occurrence of pressure ulcers. Methods. The tested beds and mattresses were the Orthoderm™ Convertible II (Bio-Clinic Inc., Ontario, Canada) low air-loss mattress on a Stryker® PMS (Stryker Inc., Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) bed; the FluidAir Elite® (KCI Inc., San Antonio, Texas, USA) air-fluidized bed; the Pegasus Airwave™ mattress (Pegasus Airwave Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, USA) on a Stryker PMS bed; and a standard hospital mattress on a Stryker PMS bed. The nineteen test subjects were all healthy with exclusion criteria of spinal cord injury, immobility, or other neurological or physical impairment. The Force Management System™ (Numotech Inc., Northridge, California, USA) was used to measure tissue interface pressure. Results: The study data show that the Pegasus Airwave mattress total surface pressure values of the anatomical regions (total body, torso, hips) of the body are lower than those of the other three tested mattresses. The total body and hip pressure resulting from pressure maturation is significantly less on the Pegasus Airwave mattress than on to the hospital bed, the air-fluidized bed, and the low air-loss bed. Conclusions: The Pegasus Airwave mattress outperforms the other tested support surfaces by decreasing overall pressure. Therefore, the Pegasus Airwave mattress is an excellent addition to augment nursing care in the prevention and treatment of pressure sores.

AB - Objective. The pressure-relieving ability of three specialized support surface mattresses was investigated and compared to a standard hospital mattress by measuring total body tissue interface pressure in a laboratory experiment designed to simulate clinical conditions predisposing to formation of pressure ulcers. Summary Background Data. Pressure ulcers are commonly seen in the elderly; in patients with trauma, burns, spinal cord injury, neurological deficits, peripheral vascular disease, and stroke; and in other patient groups with debilitating or emaciating illness. They represent from 4 to 29% of all hospital admissions. This study was undertaken to compare three different types of specialty beds to a standard hospital mattress in order to find a mattress that prevents the occurrence of pressure ulcers. Methods. The tested beds and mattresses were the Orthoderm™ Convertible II (Bio-Clinic Inc., Ontario, Canada) low air-loss mattress on a Stryker® PMS (Stryker Inc., Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) bed; the FluidAir Elite® (KCI Inc., San Antonio, Texas, USA) air-fluidized bed; the Pegasus Airwave™ mattress (Pegasus Airwave Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, USA) on a Stryker PMS bed; and a standard hospital mattress on a Stryker PMS bed. The nineteen test subjects were all healthy with exclusion criteria of spinal cord injury, immobility, or other neurological or physical impairment. The Force Management System™ (Numotech Inc., Northridge, California, USA) was used to measure tissue interface pressure. Results: The study data show that the Pegasus Airwave mattress total surface pressure values of the anatomical regions (total body, torso, hips) of the body are lower than those of the other three tested mattresses. The total body and hip pressure resulting from pressure maturation is significantly less on the Pegasus Airwave mattress than on to the hospital bed, the air-fluidized bed, and the low air-loss bed. Conclusions: The Pegasus Airwave mattress outperforms the other tested support surfaces by decreasing overall pressure. Therefore, the Pegasus Airwave mattress is an excellent addition to augment nursing care in the prevention and treatment of pressure sores.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2542447113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2542447113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v14.i2.20

DO - 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v14.i2.20

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 81

EP - 93

JO - Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

JF - Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

SN - 1050-6934

IS - 2

ER -