Computed tomography-related radiation exposure in children transferred to a Level i pediatric trauma center

Adam S. Brinkman, Kara G. Gill, Charles M. Leys, Ankush Gosain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE Pediatric trauma patients presenting to referring facilities (RF) often undergo computed tomography (CT) scans to identify injuries before transfer to a Level I pediatric trauma center (PTC). The purpose of our study was to evaluate RF compliance with the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines to minimize ionizing radiation exposure in pediatric trauma patients and to determine the frequency of additional or repeat CT imaging after transfer to a PTC. METHODS After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all pediatric trauma admissions from January 2010 to December 2011 at our American College of Surgeons Level I PTC was performed. Patient demographics, means of arrival, Injury Severity Score, and disposition were analyzed. Patients who underwent CT were grouped by means of arrival: those who were transferred from an RF versus those who presented primarily to the PTC. Compliance with ACR guidelines and need for additional or repeat CT scans were assessed for both groups. RESULTS Six hundred ninety-seven children (aged <18 years) were identified, with a mean age of 10.6 years. Three hundred twenty-one (46%) patients presented primarily to the PTC. Three hundred seventy-six (54%) were transferred from an RF, of which 90 (24%) patients underwent CT imaging before transfer. CT radiation dosing information was available for 79 (88%) of 90 patients. After transfer, 8 (9%) of 90 of children imaged at an RF required additional CT scans. In comparison, 314 (98%) of 321 patients who presented primarily to the PTC and underwent CT received appropriate pediatric radiation dosing. Mean radiation dose at PTC was approximately half of that at RF for CT scans of the head, chest, and abdomen/pelvis (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Pediatric trauma patients transferred from RF often undergo CT scanning with higher than recommended radiation doses, potentially placing them at an increased carcinogenic risk. Fortunately, few RF patients required additional CT scans after PTC transfer. Finally, compliance with ACR radiation dose limit guidelines is better achieved at a PTC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1134-1137
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume78
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 3 2015

Fingerprint

Trauma Centers
Tomography
Pediatrics
Radiation
Radiology
Wounds and Injuries
Guidelines
Radiation Exposure
Injury Severity Score
Research Ethics Committees
Ionizing Radiation
Pelvis
Abdomen

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Computed tomography-related radiation exposure in children transferred to a Level i pediatric trauma center. / Brinkman, Adam S.; Gill, Kara G.; Leys, Charles M.; Gosain, Ankush.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 78, No. 6, 03.06.2015, p. 1134-1137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5b86ab804457408bbd0f0979cdf3b39d,
title = "Computed tomography-related radiation exposure in children transferred to a Level i pediatric trauma center",
abstract = "PURPOSE Pediatric trauma patients presenting to referring facilities (RF) often undergo computed tomography (CT) scans to identify injuries before transfer to a Level I pediatric trauma center (PTC). The purpose of our study was to evaluate RF compliance with the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines to minimize ionizing radiation exposure in pediatric trauma patients and to determine the frequency of additional or repeat CT imaging after transfer to a PTC. METHODS After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all pediatric trauma admissions from January 2010 to December 2011 at our American College of Surgeons Level I PTC was performed. Patient demographics, means of arrival, Injury Severity Score, and disposition were analyzed. Patients who underwent CT were grouped by means of arrival: those who were transferred from an RF versus those who presented primarily to the PTC. Compliance with ACR guidelines and need for additional or repeat CT scans were assessed for both groups. RESULTS Six hundred ninety-seven children (aged <18 years) were identified, with a mean age of 10.6 years. Three hundred twenty-one (46{\%}) patients presented primarily to the PTC. Three hundred seventy-six (54{\%}) were transferred from an RF, of which 90 (24{\%}) patients underwent CT imaging before transfer. CT radiation dosing information was available for 79 (88{\%}) of 90 patients. After transfer, 8 (9{\%}) of 90 of children imaged at an RF required additional CT scans. In comparison, 314 (98{\%}) of 321 patients who presented primarily to the PTC and underwent CT received appropriate pediatric radiation dosing. Mean radiation dose at PTC was approximately half of that at RF for CT scans of the head, chest, and abdomen/pelvis (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Pediatric trauma patients transferred from RF often undergo CT scanning with higher than recommended radiation doses, potentially placing them at an increased carcinogenic risk. Fortunately, few RF patients required additional CT scans after PTC transfer. Finally, compliance with ACR radiation dose limit guidelines is better achieved at a PTC.",
author = "Brinkman, {Adam S.} and Gill, {Kara G.} and Leys, {Charles M.} and Ankush Gosain",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0000000000000645",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "1134--1137",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computed tomography-related radiation exposure in children transferred to a Level i pediatric trauma center

AU - Brinkman, Adam S.

AU - Gill, Kara G.

AU - Leys, Charles M.

AU - Gosain, Ankush

PY - 2015/6/3

Y1 - 2015/6/3

N2 - PURPOSE Pediatric trauma patients presenting to referring facilities (RF) often undergo computed tomography (CT) scans to identify injuries before transfer to a Level I pediatric trauma center (PTC). The purpose of our study was to evaluate RF compliance with the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines to minimize ionizing radiation exposure in pediatric trauma patients and to determine the frequency of additional or repeat CT imaging after transfer to a PTC. METHODS After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all pediatric trauma admissions from January 2010 to December 2011 at our American College of Surgeons Level I PTC was performed. Patient demographics, means of arrival, Injury Severity Score, and disposition were analyzed. Patients who underwent CT were grouped by means of arrival: those who were transferred from an RF versus those who presented primarily to the PTC. Compliance with ACR guidelines and need for additional or repeat CT scans were assessed for both groups. RESULTS Six hundred ninety-seven children (aged <18 years) were identified, with a mean age of 10.6 years. Three hundred twenty-one (46%) patients presented primarily to the PTC. Three hundred seventy-six (54%) were transferred from an RF, of which 90 (24%) patients underwent CT imaging before transfer. CT radiation dosing information was available for 79 (88%) of 90 patients. After transfer, 8 (9%) of 90 of children imaged at an RF required additional CT scans. In comparison, 314 (98%) of 321 patients who presented primarily to the PTC and underwent CT received appropriate pediatric radiation dosing. Mean radiation dose at PTC was approximately half of that at RF for CT scans of the head, chest, and abdomen/pelvis (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Pediatric trauma patients transferred from RF often undergo CT scanning with higher than recommended radiation doses, potentially placing them at an increased carcinogenic risk. Fortunately, few RF patients required additional CT scans after PTC transfer. Finally, compliance with ACR radiation dose limit guidelines is better achieved at a PTC.

AB - PURPOSE Pediatric trauma patients presenting to referring facilities (RF) often undergo computed tomography (CT) scans to identify injuries before transfer to a Level I pediatric trauma center (PTC). The purpose of our study was to evaluate RF compliance with the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines to minimize ionizing radiation exposure in pediatric trauma patients and to determine the frequency of additional or repeat CT imaging after transfer to a PTC. METHODS After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all pediatric trauma admissions from January 2010 to December 2011 at our American College of Surgeons Level I PTC was performed. Patient demographics, means of arrival, Injury Severity Score, and disposition were analyzed. Patients who underwent CT were grouped by means of arrival: those who were transferred from an RF versus those who presented primarily to the PTC. Compliance with ACR guidelines and need for additional or repeat CT scans were assessed for both groups. RESULTS Six hundred ninety-seven children (aged <18 years) were identified, with a mean age of 10.6 years. Three hundred twenty-one (46%) patients presented primarily to the PTC. Three hundred seventy-six (54%) were transferred from an RF, of which 90 (24%) patients underwent CT imaging before transfer. CT radiation dosing information was available for 79 (88%) of 90 patients. After transfer, 8 (9%) of 90 of children imaged at an RF required additional CT scans. In comparison, 314 (98%) of 321 patients who presented primarily to the PTC and underwent CT received appropriate pediatric radiation dosing. Mean radiation dose at PTC was approximately half of that at RF for CT scans of the head, chest, and abdomen/pelvis (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Pediatric trauma patients transferred from RF often undergo CT scanning with higher than recommended radiation doses, potentially placing them at an increased carcinogenic risk. Fortunately, few RF patients required additional CT scans after PTC transfer. Finally, compliance with ACR radiation dose limit guidelines is better achieved at a PTC.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930341652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930341652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000000645

DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000000645

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 1134

EP - 1137

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 6

ER -