Dentastic bond strength to dentin

Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Esther Neuman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the shear bond strength to the dentin of permanent teeth and failure site of Dentastic hydrophilic dentin bonding agent. Materials and Methods: Forty permanent noncarious molar teeth stored in distilled water were obtained. The teeth were cleaned with pumice and a rubber cup. The mesio-buccal surface of the teeth was ground flat with hand pressure with a series of SiC paper ending with the 600 grit to provide a uniform surface on dentin to which the resin composite could be applied. After preparing the tooth surface, the teeth were stored in distilled water for 48 hours. They were then divided at random into four groups of 10 specimens each: Group 1: Dentastic, five coats of primer; Group 2: Dentastic, three coats of primer; Group 3: Dentastic, five coats of primer, light-cured adhesive before resin bonding; Group 4: Dentastic, three coats of primer, light-cured adhesive before resin bonding. All specimens were thermocycled (500x) and sheared in a testing machine. After shear testing, the debonded sites of all samples were examined with a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope. Results: The results in MPa were: Group 1: 22.63 ± 6.24; Group 2: 23.35 ± 5.14; Group 3: 23.58 ± 5.66; Group 4: 27.26 ± 8.22. ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls showed no statistically significant difference between the groups. In all groups, all specimens failed at the dentin (dentin cohesive failure = dentin fracture) or at the resin (resin cohesive failure = resin fracture). This means that the bond strength of the product is stronger than the cohesive strengths of the dentin and the resin.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)130-132
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Dentistry
Volume9
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dentin
Tooth
Adhesives
Dentin-Bonding Agents
Light
Shear Strength
Water
Composite Resins
Cheek
Rubber
Dentastic
Analysis of Variance
Hand
Electrons
Students
Pressure

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Dentastic bond strength to dentin. / Garcia-Godoy, Franklin; Neuman, Esther.

In: American Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1996, p. 130-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Garcia-Godoy, F & Neuman, E 1996, 'Dentastic bond strength to dentin', American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 130-132.
Garcia-Godoy, Franklin ; Neuman, Esther. / Dentastic bond strength to dentin. In: American Journal of Dentistry. 1996 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 130-132.
@article{942e34b8c34945d2b6fdf22bbdcf2c15,
title = "Dentastic bond strength to dentin",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the shear bond strength to the dentin of permanent teeth and failure site of Dentastic hydrophilic dentin bonding agent. Materials and Methods: Forty permanent noncarious molar teeth stored in distilled water were obtained. The teeth were cleaned with pumice and a rubber cup. The mesio-buccal surface of the teeth was ground flat with hand pressure with a series of SiC paper ending with the 600 grit to provide a uniform surface on dentin to which the resin composite could be applied. After preparing the tooth surface, the teeth were stored in distilled water for 48 hours. They were then divided at random into four groups of 10 specimens each: Group 1: Dentastic, five coats of primer; Group 2: Dentastic, three coats of primer; Group 3: Dentastic, five coats of primer, light-cured adhesive before resin bonding; Group 4: Dentastic, three coats of primer, light-cured adhesive before resin bonding. All specimens were thermocycled (500x) and sheared in a testing machine. After shear testing, the debonded sites of all samples were examined with a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope. Results: The results in MPa were: Group 1: 22.63 ± 6.24; Group 2: 23.35 ± 5.14; Group 3: 23.58 ± 5.66; Group 4: 27.26 ± 8.22. ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls showed no statistically significant difference between the groups. In all groups, all specimens failed at the dentin (dentin cohesive failure = dentin fracture) or at the resin (resin cohesive failure = resin fracture). This means that the bond strength of the product is stronger than the cohesive strengths of the dentin and the resin.",
author = "Franklin Garcia-Godoy and Esther Neuman",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "130--132",
journal = "American Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0894-8275",
publisher = "Mosher and Linder, Inc",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dentastic bond strength to dentin

AU - Garcia-Godoy, Franklin

AU - Neuman, Esther

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the shear bond strength to the dentin of permanent teeth and failure site of Dentastic hydrophilic dentin bonding agent. Materials and Methods: Forty permanent noncarious molar teeth stored in distilled water were obtained. The teeth were cleaned with pumice and a rubber cup. The mesio-buccal surface of the teeth was ground flat with hand pressure with a series of SiC paper ending with the 600 grit to provide a uniform surface on dentin to which the resin composite could be applied. After preparing the tooth surface, the teeth were stored in distilled water for 48 hours. They were then divided at random into four groups of 10 specimens each: Group 1: Dentastic, five coats of primer; Group 2: Dentastic, three coats of primer; Group 3: Dentastic, five coats of primer, light-cured adhesive before resin bonding; Group 4: Dentastic, three coats of primer, light-cured adhesive before resin bonding. All specimens were thermocycled (500x) and sheared in a testing machine. After shear testing, the debonded sites of all samples were examined with a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope. Results: The results in MPa were: Group 1: 22.63 ± 6.24; Group 2: 23.35 ± 5.14; Group 3: 23.58 ± 5.66; Group 4: 27.26 ± 8.22. ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls showed no statistically significant difference between the groups. In all groups, all specimens failed at the dentin (dentin cohesive failure = dentin fracture) or at the resin (resin cohesive failure = resin fracture). This means that the bond strength of the product is stronger than the cohesive strengths of the dentin and the resin.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the shear bond strength to the dentin of permanent teeth and failure site of Dentastic hydrophilic dentin bonding agent. Materials and Methods: Forty permanent noncarious molar teeth stored in distilled water were obtained. The teeth were cleaned with pumice and a rubber cup. The mesio-buccal surface of the teeth was ground flat with hand pressure with a series of SiC paper ending with the 600 grit to provide a uniform surface on dentin to which the resin composite could be applied. After preparing the tooth surface, the teeth were stored in distilled water for 48 hours. They were then divided at random into four groups of 10 specimens each: Group 1: Dentastic, five coats of primer; Group 2: Dentastic, three coats of primer; Group 3: Dentastic, five coats of primer, light-cured adhesive before resin bonding; Group 4: Dentastic, three coats of primer, light-cured adhesive before resin bonding. All specimens were thermocycled (500x) and sheared in a testing machine. After shear testing, the debonded sites of all samples were examined with a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope. Results: The results in MPa were: Group 1: 22.63 ± 6.24; Group 2: 23.35 ± 5.14; Group 3: 23.58 ± 5.66; Group 4: 27.26 ± 8.22. ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls showed no statistically significant difference between the groups. In all groups, all specimens failed at the dentin (dentin cohesive failure = dentin fracture) or at the resin (resin cohesive failure = resin fracture). This means that the bond strength of the product is stronger than the cohesive strengths of the dentin and the resin.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842471114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842471114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 130

EP - 132

JO - American Journal of Dentistry

JF - American Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0894-8275

IS - 3

ER -