Downsizing of basic science departments in U. S. medical schools

Perceptions of their chairs

National Caucus of Basic Biomedical Science Chairs who support this report

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. To assess the status of basic science departments in academic health centers through a survey of department chairs. Method. In November 1995 the National Caucus of Basic Biomedical Science Chairs developed a 35-item questionnaire that was sent to the presidents of the Caucus’s six member associations, who distributed it to their medical school chairs. The questionnaire was sent to 90% of the basic science chairs; a total of 683 questionnaires were distributed. By April 1996, 59% (400/683) of the chairs responded. Preliminary tabulations were made by each association, and then all the questionnaires were sent to the Caucus chair for compilation and analysis. Results. The chairs in all six basic science disciplines reported four basic trends. Reduction in staffing: Eleven percent of the chairs were in “acting” positions, temporarily filling vacancies that sometimes had not been filled for five years or more. There were 583 reported faculty vacancies, but active searches were under way for only 339 of these. The chairs reported the abolition of, on average, one faculty position per department between 1985 and 1995, but these losses were clustered in only a third of the schools; thus several departments had experienced extensive faculty depletion. Overall, there was a 10% attrition of basic science faculty. Restructuring of the basic sciences: In all, 22 disciplinary departments had merged between 1985 and 1995, and merger discussions were under way at another 9% of the departments. Seven percent of the chairs reported that their schools were considering a single, combined basic science department, but only one such unit exists so far. Graduate student recruitment had become solely interdisciplinary at 26% of the schools, had remained strictly departmental at another 44%, and was joint at the remaining 30%. The development of a non-research-based teaching track was being considered at a fourth of the reporting departments. New fiscal poli-ciestprofessional stability: A salary incentive beyond the university contribution, to reward research funding, was in effect at 28% of the departments and under consideration by another 29%. For a junior faculty member who, at the time of tenure decision, lacked research grant support, termination was reported by almost a third of the chairs as being extremely likely; however, half of the chairs did not respond to this question. Changes in tenure: A fourth of the chairs reported that modifications of their school’s tenure policies were under serious consideration; and almost three fourths felt that tenure had become more difficult to achieve. Conclusion. This survey reveals certain profound and disconcerting changes in the basic science departments of U.S. medical school. More studies are needed to see whether these trends continue. Further downsizing and merging of the basic sciences should be avoided in order to preserve the quality of medical education for future physicians as well as the quality of health care in the United States.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)894-900
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
Volume72
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

Medical Schools
Organized Financing
Quality of Health Care
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Medical Education
Reward
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires
Motivation
Teaching
Joints
Students
Physicians
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Downsizing of basic science departments in U. S. medical schools : Perceptions of their chairs. / National Caucus of Basic Biomedical Science Chairs who support this report.

In: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, Vol. 72, No. 10, 01.01.1997, p. 894-900.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

National Caucus of Basic Biomedical Science Chairs who support this report. / Downsizing of basic science departments in U. S. medical schools : Perceptions of their chairs. In: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 1997 ; Vol. 72, No. 10. pp. 894-900.
@article{bdbb95306aab4dadb49bb93bb34189ec,
title = "Downsizing of basic science departments in U. S. medical schools: Perceptions of their chairs",
abstract = "Purpose. To assess the status of basic science departments in academic health centers through a survey of department chairs. Method. In November 1995 the National Caucus of Basic Biomedical Science Chairs developed a 35-item questionnaire that was sent to the presidents of the Caucus’s six member associations, who distributed it to their medical school chairs. The questionnaire was sent to 90{\%} of the basic science chairs; a total of 683 questionnaires were distributed. By April 1996, 59{\%} (400/683) of the chairs responded. Preliminary tabulations were made by each association, and then all the questionnaires were sent to the Caucus chair for compilation and analysis. Results. The chairs in all six basic science disciplines reported four basic trends. Reduction in staffing: Eleven percent of the chairs were in “acting” positions, temporarily filling vacancies that sometimes had not been filled for five years or more. There were 583 reported faculty vacancies, but active searches were under way for only 339 of these. The chairs reported the abolition of, on average, one faculty position per department between 1985 and 1995, but these losses were clustered in only a third of the schools; thus several departments had experienced extensive faculty depletion. Overall, there was a 10{\%} attrition of basic science faculty. Restructuring of the basic sciences: In all, 22 disciplinary departments had merged between 1985 and 1995, and merger discussions were under way at another 9{\%} of the departments. Seven percent of the chairs reported that their schools were considering a single, combined basic science department, but only one such unit exists so far. Graduate student recruitment had become solely interdisciplinary at 26{\%} of the schools, had remained strictly departmental at another 44{\%}, and was joint at the remaining 30{\%}. The development of a non-research-based teaching track was being considered at a fourth of the reporting departments. New fiscal poli-ciestprofessional stability: A salary incentive beyond the university contribution, to reward research funding, was in effect at 28{\%} of the departments and under consideration by another 29{\%}. For a junior faculty member who, at the time of tenure decision, lacked research grant support, termination was reported by almost a third of the chairs as being extremely likely; however, half of the chairs did not respond to this question. Changes in tenure: A fourth of the chairs reported that modifications of their school’s tenure policies were under serious consideration; and almost three fourths felt that tenure had become more difficult to achieve. Conclusion. This survey reveals certain profound and disconcerting changes in the basic science departments of U.S. medical school. More studies are needed to see whether these trends continue. Further downsizing and merging of the basic sciences should be avoided in order to preserve the quality of medical education for future physicians as well as the quality of health care in the United States.",
author = "{National Caucus of Basic Biomedical Science Chairs who support this report} and Mandel, {H. George} and Kelley, {Robert O.} and Marchase, {Richard B.} and Hoss, {Michael H.} and Peter satir and Yates, {Roberts D.} and Blaustein, {Mordecai P.} and {De Weer}, {Paul J.} and Foreman, {Robert D.} and Navar, {L. Gabriel} and Antonio Scarpa and Cooper, {Terrance G.} and Courtney, {Richard J.} and Terrance Cooper and Phibbs, {Paul V.} and Beattie, {Diana S.} and Lingrel, {Jerry B.} and Robert Roskoski and Smith, {Thomas E.} and Besch, {Henry R.} and Grollman, {Arthur P.} and Vessel, {Elliot S.} and Woosley, {Raymond L.} and Jeffrey Cossman and Gardner, {William A.} and Sanfilippo, {Fred P.} and Taylor, {Clive R.} and Wright, {John R.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00001888-199710000-00020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "894--900",
journal = "Journal. Association of American Medical Colleges",
issn = "0095-9545",
publisher = "Association of American Medical Colleges",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Downsizing of basic science departments in U. S. medical schools

T2 - Perceptions of their chairs

AU - National Caucus of Basic Biomedical Science Chairs who support this report

AU - Mandel, H. George

AU - Kelley, Robert O.

AU - Marchase, Richard B.

AU - Hoss, Michael H.

AU - satir, Peter

AU - Yates, Roberts D.

AU - Blaustein, Mordecai P.

AU - De Weer, Paul J.

AU - Foreman, Robert D.

AU - Navar, L. Gabriel

AU - Scarpa, Antonio

AU - Cooper, Terrance G.

AU - Courtney, Richard J.

AU - Cooper, Terrance

AU - Phibbs, Paul V.

AU - Beattie, Diana S.

AU - Lingrel, Jerry B.

AU - Roskoski, Robert

AU - Smith, Thomas E.

AU - Besch, Henry R.

AU - Grollman, Arthur P.

AU - Vessel, Elliot S.

AU - Woosley, Raymond L.

AU - Cossman, Jeffrey

AU - Gardner, William A.

AU - Sanfilippo, Fred P.

AU - Taylor, Clive R.

AU - Wright, John R.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Purpose. To assess the status of basic science departments in academic health centers through a survey of department chairs. Method. In November 1995 the National Caucus of Basic Biomedical Science Chairs developed a 35-item questionnaire that was sent to the presidents of the Caucus’s six member associations, who distributed it to their medical school chairs. The questionnaire was sent to 90% of the basic science chairs; a total of 683 questionnaires were distributed. By April 1996, 59% (400/683) of the chairs responded. Preliminary tabulations were made by each association, and then all the questionnaires were sent to the Caucus chair for compilation and analysis. Results. The chairs in all six basic science disciplines reported four basic trends. Reduction in staffing: Eleven percent of the chairs were in “acting” positions, temporarily filling vacancies that sometimes had not been filled for five years or more. There were 583 reported faculty vacancies, but active searches were under way for only 339 of these. The chairs reported the abolition of, on average, one faculty position per department between 1985 and 1995, but these losses were clustered in only a third of the schools; thus several departments had experienced extensive faculty depletion. Overall, there was a 10% attrition of basic science faculty. Restructuring of the basic sciences: In all, 22 disciplinary departments had merged between 1985 and 1995, and merger discussions were under way at another 9% of the departments. Seven percent of the chairs reported that their schools were considering a single, combined basic science department, but only one such unit exists so far. Graduate student recruitment had become solely interdisciplinary at 26% of the schools, had remained strictly departmental at another 44%, and was joint at the remaining 30%. The development of a non-research-based teaching track was being considered at a fourth of the reporting departments. New fiscal poli-ciestprofessional stability: A salary incentive beyond the university contribution, to reward research funding, was in effect at 28% of the departments and under consideration by another 29%. For a junior faculty member who, at the time of tenure decision, lacked research grant support, termination was reported by almost a third of the chairs as being extremely likely; however, half of the chairs did not respond to this question. Changes in tenure: A fourth of the chairs reported that modifications of their school’s tenure policies were under serious consideration; and almost three fourths felt that tenure had become more difficult to achieve. Conclusion. This survey reveals certain profound and disconcerting changes in the basic science departments of U.S. medical school. More studies are needed to see whether these trends continue. Further downsizing and merging of the basic sciences should be avoided in order to preserve the quality of medical education for future physicians as well as the quality of health care in the United States.

AB - Purpose. To assess the status of basic science departments in academic health centers through a survey of department chairs. Method. In November 1995 the National Caucus of Basic Biomedical Science Chairs developed a 35-item questionnaire that was sent to the presidents of the Caucus’s six member associations, who distributed it to their medical school chairs. The questionnaire was sent to 90% of the basic science chairs; a total of 683 questionnaires were distributed. By April 1996, 59% (400/683) of the chairs responded. Preliminary tabulations were made by each association, and then all the questionnaires were sent to the Caucus chair for compilation and analysis. Results. The chairs in all six basic science disciplines reported four basic trends. Reduction in staffing: Eleven percent of the chairs were in “acting” positions, temporarily filling vacancies that sometimes had not been filled for five years or more. There were 583 reported faculty vacancies, but active searches were under way for only 339 of these. The chairs reported the abolition of, on average, one faculty position per department between 1985 and 1995, but these losses were clustered in only a third of the schools; thus several departments had experienced extensive faculty depletion. Overall, there was a 10% attrition of basic science faculty. Restructuring of the basic sciences: In all, 22 disciplinary departments had merged between 1985 and 1995, and merger discussions were under way at another 9% of the departments. Seven percent of the chairs reported that their schools were considering a single, combined basic science department, but only one such unit exists so far. Graduate student recruitment had become solely interdisciplinary at 26% of the schools, had remained strictly departmental at another 44%, and was joint at the remaining 30%. The development of a non-research-based teaching track was being considered at a fourth of the reporting departments. New fiscal poli-ciestprofessional stability: A salary incentive beyond the university contribution, to reward research funding, was in effect at 28% of the departments and under consideration by another 29%. For a junior faculty member who, at the time of tenure decision, lacked research grant support, termination was reported by almost a third of the chairs as being extremely likely; however, half of the chairs did not respond to this question. Changes in tenure: A fourth of the chairs reported that modifications of their school’s tenure policies were under serious consideration; and almost three fourths felt that tenure had become more difficult to achieve. Conclusion. This survey reveals certain profound and disconcerting changes in the basic science departments of U.S. medical school. More studies are needed to see whether these trends continue. Further downsizing and merging of the basic sciences should be avoided in order to preserve the quality of medical education for future physicians as well as the quality of health care in the United States.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030668233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030668233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00001888-199710000-00020

DO - 10.1097/00001888-199710000-00020

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 894

EP - 900

JO - Journal. Association of American Medical Colleges

JF - Journal. Association of American Medical Colleges

SN - 0095-9545

IS - 10

ER -