Effect of a long-term intensive lifestyle intervention on prevalence of cognitive impairment

Mark A. Espeland, José A. Luchsinger, Laura D. Baker, Rebecca Neiberg, Steven E. Kahn, Steven E. Arnold, Rena R. Wing, George L. Blackburn, George Bray, Mary Evans, Helen P. Hazuda, Robert W. Jeffery, Valerie M. Wilson, Jeanne M. Clark, Mathilda Coday, Kathryn Demos-McDermott, John P. Foreyt, Frank Greenway, James O. Hill, Edward S. Horton & 10 others John M. Jakicic, Karen Johnson, William C. Knowler, Cora E. Lewis, David M. Nathan, Anne Peters, Xavier Pi-Sunyer, Henry Pownall, Thomas A. Wadden, Stephen R. Rapp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether an average of 10 years of lifestyle intervention designed to reduce weight and increase physical activity lowers the prevalence of cognitive impairment among adults at increased risk due to type 2 diabetes and obesity or overweight. Methods: Central adjudication of mild cognitive impairment and probable dementia was based on standardized cognitive test battery scores administered to 3,802 individuals who had been randomly assigned, with equal probability, to either the lifestyle intervention or the diabetes support and education control. When scores fell below a prespecified threshold, functional information was obtained through proxy interview. Results: Compared with control, the intensive lifestyle intervention induced and maintained marked differences in weight loss and self-reported physical activity throughout follow-up. At an average (range) of 11.4 (9.5-13.5) years after enrollment, when participants' mean age was 69.6 (54.9-87.2) years, the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and probable dementia was 6.4% and 1.8%, respectively, in the intervention group, compared with 6.6% and 1.8%, respectively, in the control group (p 5 0.93). The lack of an intervention effect on the prevalence of cognitive impairment was consistent among individuals grouped by cardiovascular disease history, diabetes duration, sex, and APOE e4 allele status (all p $ 0.50). However, there was evidence (p 5 0.03) that the intervention effect ranged from benefit to harm across participants ordered from lowest to highest baseline BMI. Conclusions: Ten years of behavioral weight loss intervention did not result in an overall difference in the prevalence of cognitive impairment among overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00017953 (Action for Health in Diabetes). Level of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for overweight adults with type 2 diabetes, a lifestyle intervention designed to reduce weight and increase physical activity does not lower the risk of cognitive impairment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2026-2035
Number of pages10
JournalNeurology
Volume88
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - May 23 2017

Fingerprint

Life Style
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Exercise
Dementia
Weight Loss
Weights and Measures
Proxy
Cognitive Dysfunction
Cardiovascular Diseases
Obesity
Alleles
Interviews
Education
Control Groups
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Espeland, M. A., Luchsinger, J. A., Baker, L. D., Neiberg, R., Kahn, S. E., Arnold, S. E., ... Rapp, S. R. (2017). Effect of a long-term intensive lifestyle intervention on prevalence of cognitive impairment. Neurology, 88(21), 2026-2035. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003955

Effect of a long-term intensive lifestyle intervention on prevalence of cognitive impairment. / Espeland, Mark A.; Luchsinger, José A.; Baker, Laura D.; Neiberg, Rebecca; Kahn, Steven E.; Arnold, Steven E.; Wing, Rena R.; Blackburn, George L.; Bray, George; Evans, Mary; Hazuda, Helen P.; Jeffery, Robert W.; Wilson, Valerie M.; Clark, Jeanne M.; Coday, Mathilda; Demos-McDermott, Kathryn; Foreyt, John P.; Greenway, Frank; Hill, James O.; Horton, Edward S.; Jakicic, John M.; Johnson, Karen; Knowler, William C.; Lewis, Cora E.; Nathan, David M.; Peters, Anne; Pi-Sunyer, Xavier; Pownall, Henry; Wadden, Thomas A.; Rapp, Stephen R.

In: Neurology, Vol. 88, No. 21, 23.05.2017, p. 2026-2035.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Espeland, MA, Luchsinger, JA, Baker, LD, Neiberg, R, Kahn, SE, Arnold, SE, Wing, RR, Blackburn, GL, Bray, G, Evans, M, Hazuda, HP, Jeffery, RW, Wilson, VM, Clark, JM, Coday, M, Demos-McDermott, K, Foreyt, JP, Greenway, F, Hill, JO, Horton, ES, Jakicic, JM, Johnson, K, Knowler, WC, Lewis, CE, Nathan, DM, Peters, A, Pi-Sunyer, X, Pownall, H, Wadden, TA & Rapp, SR 2017, 'Effect of a long-term intensive lifestyle intervention on prevalence of cognitive impairment', Neurology, vol. 88, no. 21, pp. 2026-2035. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003955
Espeland MA, Luchsinger JA, Baker LD, Neiberg R, Kahn SE, Arnold SE et al. Effect of a long-term intensive lifestyle intervention on prevalence of cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2017 May 23;88(21):2026-2035. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003955
Espeland, Mark A. ; Luchsinger, José A. ; Baker, Laura D. ; Neiberg, Rebecca ; Kahn, Steven E. ; Arnold, Steven E. ; Wing, Rena R. ; Blackburn, George L. ; Bray, George ; Evans, Mary ; Hazuda, Helen P. ; Jeffery, Robert W. ; Wilson, Valerie M. ; Clark, Jeanne M. ; Coday, Mathilda ; Demos-McDermott, Kathryn ; Foreyt, John P. ; Greenway, Frank ; Hill, James O. ; Horton, Edward S. ; Jakicic, John M. ; Johnson, Karen ; Knowler, William C. ; Lewis, Cora E. ; Nathan, David M. ; Peters, Anne ; Pi-Sunyer, Xavier ; Pownall, Henry ; Wadden, Thomas A. ; Rapp, Stephen R. / Effect of a long-term intensive lifestyle intervention on prevalence of cognitive impairment. In: Neurology. 2017 ; Vol. 88, No. 21. pp. 2026-2035.
@article{ebe9e40e7dc54d40b66b6334b7df1b49,
title = "Effect of a long-term intensive lifestyle intervention on prevalence of cognitive impairment",
abstract = "Objective: To assess whether an average of 10 years of lifestyle intervention designed to reduce weight and increase physical activity lowers the prevalence of cognitive impairment among adults at increased risk due to type 2 diabetes and obesity or overweight. Methods: Central adjudication of mild cognitive impairment and probable dementia was based on standardized cognitive test battery scores administered to 3,802 individuals who had been randomly assigned, with equal probability, to either the lifestyle intervention or the diabetes support and education control. When scores fell below a prespecified threshold, functional information was obtained through proxy interview. Results: Compared with control, the intensive lifestyle intervention induced and maintained marked differences in weight loss and self-reported physical activity throughout follow-up. At an average (range) of 11.4 (9.5-13.5) years after enrollment, when participants' mean age was 69.6 (54.9-87.2) years, the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and probable dementia was 6.4{\%} and 1.8{\%}, respectively, in the intervention group, compared with 6.6{\%} and 1.8{\%}, respectively, in the control group (p 5 0.93). The lack of an intervention effect on the prevalence of cognitive impairment was consistent among individuals grouped by cardiovascular disease history, diabetes duration, sex, and APOE e4 allele status (all p $ 0.50). However, there was evidence (p 5 0.03) that the intervention effect ranged from benefit to harm across participants ordered from lowest to highest baseline BMI. Conclusions: Ten years of behavioral weight loss intervention did not result in an overall difference in the prevalence of cognitive impairment among overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00017953 (Action for Health in Diabetes). Level of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for overweight adults with type 2 diabetes, a lifestyle intervention designed to reduce weight and increase physical activity does not lower the risk of cognitive impairment.",
author = "Espeland, {Mark A.} and Luchsinger, {Jos{\'e} A.} and Baker, {Laura D.} and Rebecca Neiberg and Kahn, {Steven E.} and Arnold, {Steven E.} and Wing, {Rena R.} and Blackburn, {George L.} and George Bray and Mary Evans and Hazuda, {Helen P.} and Jeffery, {Robert W.} and Wilson, {Valerie M.} and Clark, {Jeanne M.} and Mathilda Coday and Kathryn Demos-McDermott and Foreyt, {John P.} and Frank Greenway and Hill, {James O.} and Horton, {Edward S.} and Jakicic, {John M.} and Karen Johnson and Knowler, {William C.} and Lewis, {Cora E.} and Nathan, {David M.} and Anne Peters and Xavier Pi-Sunyer and Henry Pownall and Wadden, {Thomas A.} and Rapp, {Stephen R.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1212/WNL.0000000000003955",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "2026--2035",
journal = "Neurology",
issn = "0028-3878",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of a long-term intensive lifestyle intervention on prevalence of cognitive impairment

AU - Espeland, Mark A.

AU - Luchsinger, José A.

AU - Baker, Laura D.

AU - Neiberg, Rebecca

AU - Kahn, Steven E.

AU - Arnold, Steven E.

AU - Wing, Rena R.

AU - Blackburn, George L.

AU - Bray, George

AU - Evans, Mary

AU - Hazuda, Helen P.

AU - Jeffery, Robert W.

AU - Wilson, Valerie M.

AU - Clark, Jeanne M.

AU - Coday, Mathilda

AU - Demos-McDermott, Kathryn

AU - Foreyt, John P.

AU - Greenway, Frank

AU - Hill, James O.

AU - Horton, Edward S.

AU - Jakicic, John M.

AU - Johnson, Karen

AU - Knowler, William C.

AU - Lewis, Cora E.

AU - Nathan, David M.

AU - Peters, Anne

AU - Pi-Sunyer, Xavier

AU - Pownall, Henry

AU - Wadden, Thomas A.

AU - Rapp, Stephen R.

PY - 2017/5/23

Y1 - 2017/5/23

N2 - Objective: To assess whether an average of 10 years of lifestyle intervention designed to reduce weight and increase physical activity lowers the prevalence of cognitive impairment among adults at increased risk due to type 2 diabetes and obesity or overweight. Methods: Central adjudication of mild cognitive impairment and probable dementia was based on standardized cognitive test battery scores administered to 3,802 individuals who had been randomly assigned, with equal probability, to either the lifestyle intervention or the diabetes support and education control. When scores fell below a prespecified threshold, functional information was obtained through proxy interview. Results: Compared with control, the intensive lifestyle intervention induced and maintained marked differences in weight loss and self-reported physical activity throughout follow-up. At an average (range) of 11.4 (9.5-13.5) years after enrollment, when participants' mean age was 69.6 (54.9-87.2) years, the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and probable dementia was 6.4% and 1.8%, respectively, in the intervention group, compared with 6.6% and 1.8%, respectively, in the control group (p 5 0.93). The lack of an intervention effect on the prevalence of cognitive impairment was consistent among individuals grouped by cardiovascular disease history, diabetes duration, sex, and APOE e4 allele status (all p $ 0.50). However, there was evidence (p 5 0.03) that the intervention effect ranged from benefit to harm across participants ordered from lowest to highest baseline BMI. Conclusions: Ten years of behavioral weight loss intervention did not result in an overall difference in the prevalence of cognitive impairment among overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00017953 (Action for Health in Diabetes). Level of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for overweight adults with type 2 diabetes, a lifestyle intervention designed to reduce weight and increase physical activity does not lower the risk of cognitive impairment.

AB - Objective: To assess whether an average of 10 years of lifestyle intervention designed to reduce weight and increase physical activity lowers the prevalence of cognitive impairment among adults at increased risk due to type 2 diabetes and obesity or overweight. Methods: Central adjudication of mild cognitive impairment and probable dementia was based on standardized cognitive test battery scores administered to 3,802 individuals who had been randomly assigned, with equal probability, to either the lifestyle intervention or the diabetes support and education control. When scores fell below a prespecified threshold, functional information was obtained through proxy interview. Results: Compared with control, the intensive lifestyle intervention induced and maintained marked differences in weight loss and self-reported physical activity throughout follow-up. At an average (range) of 11.4 (9.5-13.5) years after enrollment, when participants' mean age was 69.6 (54.9-87.2) years, the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and probable dementia was 6.4% and 1.8%, respectively, in the intervention group, compared with 6.6% and 1.8%, respectively, in the control group (p 5 0.93). The lack of an intervention effect on the prevalence of cognitive impairment was consistent among individuals grouped by cardiovascular disease history, diabetes duration, sex, and APOE e4 allele status (all p $ 0.50). However, there was evidence (p 5 0.03) that the intervention effect ranged from benefit to harm across participants ordered from lowest to highest baseline BMI. Conclusions: Ten years of behavioral weight loss intervention did not result in an overall difference in the prevalence of cognitive impairment among overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00017953 (Action for Health in Diabetes). Level of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for overweight adults with type 2 diabetes, a lifestyle intervention designed to reduce weight and increase physical activity does not lower the risk of cognitive impairment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019863897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019863897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003955

DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003955

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 2026

EP - 2035

JO - Neurology

JF - Neurology

SN - 0028-3878

IS - 21

ER -