Effect of four intermediate layer treatments on microleakage of Class II composite restorations.

M. S. Hagge, J. S. Lindemuth, J. F. Mason, James Simon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This in vitro study examines the marginal sealing ability of four different intermediate materials applied before placement of a condensable composite. Class II preparations were made with gingival margins placed 1.0 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction of 60 extracted teeth, randomly assigned to five groups of 12. Following restoration, teeth were thermocycled, soaked in 0.5% basic fuchsin, and sectioned longitudinally. The resin-modified glass ionomer cement demonstrated significantly less microleakage than the use of a dentin bonding agent alone or in combination with flowable composite, flowable compomer, or autoploymerizing composite (p < 0.05, Dunn's test). This study supports the use of the glass ionomer open sandwich technique in deep Class II direct composite restorations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalGeneral Dentistry
Volume49
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tooth
Dentin-Bonding Agents
Compomers
Tooth Cervix
Glass Ionomer Cements
flowable hybrid composite
basic fuchsin
glass ionomer
In Vitro Techniques

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Effect of four intermediate layer treatments on microleakage of Class II composite restorations. / Hagge, M. S.; Lindemuth, J. S.; Mason, J. F.; Simon, James.

In: General Dentistry, Vol. 49, No. 5, 01.01.2001.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6dd14b52c6ed45a4b6f3bd9223e4884b,
title = "Effect of four intermediate layer treatments on microleakage of Class II composite restorations.",
abstract = "This in vitro study examines the marginal sealing ability of four different intermediate materials applied before placement of a condensable composite. Class II preparations were made with gingival margins placed 1.0 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction of 60 extracted teeth, randomly assigned to five groups of 12. Following restoration, teeth were thermocycled, soaked in 0.5{\%} basic fuchsin, and sectioned longitudinally. The resin-modified glass ionomer cement demonstrated significantly less microleakage than the use of a dentin bonding agent alone or in combination with flowable composite, flowable compomer, or autoploymerizing composite (p < 0.05, Dunn's test). This study supports the use of the glass ionomer open sandwich technique in deep Class II direct composite restorations.",
author = "Hagge, {M. S.} and Lindemuth, {J. S.} and Mason, {J. F.} and James Simon",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
journal = "General Dentistry",
issn = "0363-6771",
publisher = "Academy of General Dentistry",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of four intermediate layer treatments on microleakage of Class II composite restorations.

AU - Hagge, M. S.

AU - Lindemuth, J. S.

AU - Mason, J. F.

AU - Simon, James

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - This in vitro study examines the marginal sealing ability of four different intermediate materials applied before placement of a condensable composite. Class II preparations were made with gingival margins placed 1.0 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction of 60 extracted teeth, randomly assigned to five groups of 12. Following restoration, teeth were thermocycled, soaked in 0.5% basic fuchsin, and sectioned longitudinally. The resin-modified glass ionomer cement demonstrated significantly less microleakage than the use of a dentin bonding agent alone or in combination with flowable composite, flowable compomer, or autoploymerizing composite (p < 0.05, Dunn's test). This study supports the use of the glass ionomer open sandwich technique in deep Class II direct composite restorations.

AB - This in vitro study examines the marginal sealing ability of four different intermediate materials applied before placement of a condensable composite. Class II preparations were made with gingival margins placed 1.0 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction of 60 extracted teeth, randomly assigned to five groups of 12. Following restoration, teeth were thermocycled, soaked in 0.5% basic fuchsin, and sectioned longitudinally. The resin-modified glass ionomer cement demonstrated significantly less microleakage than the use of a dentin bonding agent alone or in combination with flowable composite, flowable compomer, or autoploymerizing composite (p < 0.05, Dunn's test). This study supports the use of the glass ionomer open sandwich technique in deep Class II direct composite restorations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035469613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035469613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12017793

AN - SCOPUS:0035469613

VL - 49

JO - General Dentistry

JF - General Dentistry

SN - 0363-6771

IS - 5

ER -