Effect of Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Severity Classifications on Satisfaction With Outcomes 12 Months After Elective Surgery for Cervical Spine Myelopathy

for QOD Vanguard Sites

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: This study retrospectively analyzes prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Here, we aim to determine the influence of preoperative and 12-month modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) on satisfaction and understand the change in mJOA severity classification after surgical management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DCM is a progressive degenerative spine disease resulting from cervical cord compression. The natural progression of DCM is variable; some patients experience periods of stability, while others rapidly deteriorate following disease onset. The mJOA is commonly used to grade and categorize myelopathy symptoms, but its association with postoperative satisfaction has not been previously explored. METHODS: The quality and outcomes database (QOD) was queried for patients undergoing elective surgery for DCM. Patients were divided into mild (≥14), moderate (9 to 13), or severe (<9) categories on the mJOA scores. A McNemar-Bowker test was used to assess whether a significant proportion of patients changed mJOA category between preoperative and 12 months postoperative. A multivariable proportional odds ordinal logistic regression model was fitted with 12-month satisfaction as the outcome of interest. RESULTS: We identified 1963 patients who underwent elective surgery for DCM and completed 12-months follow-ups. Comparing mJOA severity level preoperatively and at 12 months revealed that 55% remained in the same category, 37% improved, and 7% moved to a worse category. After adjusting for baseline and surgery-specific variables, the 12-month mJOA category had the highest impact on patient satisfaction (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction is an indispensable tool for measuring quality of care after spine surgery. In this sample, 12-month mJOA category, regardless of preop mJOA, was significantly correlated with satisfaction. Given these findings, it is important to advise patients of the probability that surgery will change their mJOA severity classification and the changes required to achieve postoperative satisfaction.3.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)801-808
Number of pages8
JournalSpine
Volume44
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Diseases
Orthopedics
Spine
Patient Satisfaction
Logistic Models
Quality of Health Care
Databases

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Effect of Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Severity Classifications on Satisfaction With Outcomes 12 Months After Elective Surgery for Cervical Spine Myelopathy. / for QOD Vanguard Sites.

In: Spine, Vol. 44, No. 11, 01.06.2019, p. 801-808.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{70ff29e8f78a446e9c0bce40db1e8913,
title = "Effect of Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Severity Classifications on Satisfaction With Outcomes 12 Months After Elective Surgery for Cervical Spine Myelopathy",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN: This study retrospectively analyzes prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Here, we aim to determine the influence of preoperative and 12-month modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) on satisfaction and understand the change in mJOA severity classification after surgical management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DCM is a progressive degenerative spine disease resulting from cervical cord compression. The natural progression of DCM is variable; some patients experience periods of stability, while others rapidly deteriorate following disease onset. The mJOA is commonly used to grade and categorize myelopathy symptoms, but its association with postoperative satisfaction has not been previously explored. METHODS: The quality and outcomes database (QOD) was queried for patients undergoing elective surgery for DCM. Patients were divided into mild (≥14), moderate (9 to 13), or severe (<9) categories on the mJOA scores. A McNemar-Bowker test was used to assess whether a significant proportion of patients changed mJOA category between preoperative and 12 months postoperative. A multivariable proportional odds ordinal logistic regression model was fitted with 12-month satisfaction as the outcome of interest. RESULTS: We identified 1963 patients who underwent elective surgery for DCM and completed 12-months follow-ups. Comparing mJOA severity level preoperatively and at 12 months revealed that 55{\%} remained in the same category, 37{\%} improved, and 7{\%} moved to a worse category. After adjusting for baseline and surgery-specific variables, the 12-month mJOA category had the highest impact on patient satisfaction (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction is an indispensable tool for measuring quality of care after spine surgery. In this sample, 12-month mJOA category, regardless of preop mJOA, was significantly correlated with satisfaction. Given these findings, it is important to advise patients of the probability that surgery will change their mJOA severity classification and the changes required to achieve postoperative satisfaction.3.",
author = "{for QOD Vanguard Sites} and Asher, {Anthony L.} and Devin, {Clinton J.} and Weisenthal, {Benjamin M.} and Jacquelyn Pennings and Inamullah Khan and Archer, {Kristin R.} and Ahilan Sivaganesan and Silky Chotai and Mohamad Bydon and Hui Nian and Harrell, {Frank E.} and McGirt, {Matthew J.} and Praveen Mummaneni and Bisson, {Erica F.} and Christopher Shaffrey and Kevin Foley",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0000000000002946",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "801--808",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Severity Classifications on Satisfaction With Outcomes 12 Months After Elective Surgery for Cervical Spine Myelopathy

AU - for QOD Vanguard Sites

AU - Asher, Anthony L.

AU - Devin, Clinton J.

AU - Weisenthal, Benjamin M.

AU - Pennings, Jacquelyn

AU - Khan, Inamullah

AU - Archer, Kristin R.

AU - Sivaganesan, Ahilan

AU - Chotai, Silky

AU - Bydon, Mohamad

AU - Nian, Hui

AU - Harrell, Frank E.

AU - McGirt, Matthew J.

AU - Mummaneni, Praveen

AU - Bisson, Erica F.

AU - Shaffrey, Christopher

AU - Foley, Kevin

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - STUDY DESIGN: This study retrospectively analyzes prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Here, we aim to determine the influence of preoperative and 12-month modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) on satisfaction and understand the change in mJOA severity classification after surgical management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DCM is a progressive degenerative spine disease resulting from cervical cord compression. The natural progression of DCM is variable; some patients experience periods of stability, while others rapidly deteriorate following disease onset. The mJOA is commonly used to grade and categorize myelopathy symptoms, but its association with postoperative satisfaction has not been previously explored. METHODS: The quality and outcomes database (QOD) was queried for patients undergoing elective surgery for DCM. Patients were divided into mild (≥14), moderate (9 to 13), or severe (<9) categories on the mJOA scores. A McNemar-Bowker test was used to assess whether a significant proportion of patients changed mJOA category between preoperative and 12 months postoperative. A multivariable proportional odds ordinal logistic regression model was fitted with 12-month satisfaction as the outcome of interest. RESULTS: We identified 1963 patients who underwent elective surgery for DCM and completed 12-months follow-ups. Comparing mJOA severity level preoperatively and at 12 months revealed that 55% remained in the same category, 37% improved, and 7% moved to a worse category. After adjusting for baseline and surgery-specific variables, the 12-month mJOA category had the highest impact on patient satisfaction (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction is an indispensable tool for measuring quality of care after spine surgery. In this sample, 12-month mJOA category, regardless of preop mJOA, was significantly correlated with satisfaction. Given these findings, it is important to advise patients of the probability that surgery will change their mJOA severity classification and the changes required to achieve postoperative satisfaction.3.

AB - STUDY DESIGN: This study retrospectively analyzes prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Here, we aim to determine the influence of preoperative and 12-month modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) on satisfaction and understand the change in mJOA severity classification after surgical management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DCM is a progressive degenerative spine disease resulting from cervical cord compression. The natural progression of DCM is variable; some patients experience periods of stability, while others rapidly deteriorate following disease onset. The mJOA is commonly used to grade and categorize myelopathy symptoms, but its association with postoperative satisfaction has not been previously explored. METHODS: The quality and outcomes database (QOD) was queried for patients undergoing elective surgery for DCM. Patients were divided into mild (≥14), moderate (9 to 13), or severe (<9) categories on the mJOA scores. A McNemar-Bowker test was used to assess whether a significant proportion of patients changed mJOA category between preoperative and 12 months postoperative. A multivariable proportional odds ordinal logistic regression model was fitted with 12-month satisfaction as the outcome of interest. RESULTS: We identified 1963 patients who underwent elective surgery for DCM and completed 12-months follow-ups. Comparing mJOA severity level preoperatively and at 12 months revealed that 55% remained in the same category, 37% improved, and 7% moved to a worse category. After adjusting for baseline and surgery-specific variables, the 12-month mJOA category had the highest impact on patient satisfaction (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction is an indispensable tool for measuring quality of care after spine surgery. In this sample, 12-month mJOA category, regardless of preop mJOA, was significantly correlated with satisfaction. Given these findings, it is important to advise patients of the probability that surgery will change their mJOA severity classification and the changes required to achieve postoperative satisfaction.3.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066993370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066993370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002946

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002946

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 801

EP - 808

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 11

ER -