Effects of prophylactic agents on shear bond strength of resin composite bonding to enamel

Franklin Garcia-Godoy, J. A. O'Quinn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this study, the effect of different tooth cleansing methods on shear bond strength of resin composite bonding to enamel was evaluated. The buccal enamel surface of 45 noncarious permanent molars was ground flat to provide a uniform surface to which composite was applied. Care was taken to avoid dentin exposure in this procedure. The teeth were divided randomly into 3 groups of 15 teeth. Group 1 was treated with prophylaxis with a rubber cup and pumice, Group 2 with prophylaxis with a rubber cup and nonfluoridated paste, and Group 3 with prophylaxis with a rubber cup and fluoridated paste. After thermocycling, the samples were sheared in the Instron. Results, in MPa, were: Group 1: 14.70 +/- 4.44, Group 2:15.82 +/- 2.70, and Group 3: 16.41 +/- 5.93. Analysis of variance showed no difference among the three groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)557-559
Number of pages3
JournalGeneral Dentistry
Volume41
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Shear Strength
Composite Resins
Rubber
Dental Enamel
Tooth
Ointments
Cheek
Dentin
Analysis of Variance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Effects of prophylactic agents on shear bond strength of resin composite bonding to enamel. / Garcia-Godoy, Franklin; O'Quinn, J. A.

In: General Dentistry, Vol. 41, No. 6, 01.01.1993, p. 557-559.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0050ff65afe447acb98b7f7dea138c38,
title = "Effects of prophylactic agents on shear bond strength of resin composite bonding to enamel",
abstract = "In this study, the effect of different tooth cleansing methods on shear bond strength of resin composite bonding to enamel was evaluated. The buccal enamel surface of 45 noncarious permanent molars was ground flat to provide a uniform surface to which composite was applied. Care was taken to avoid dentin exposure in this procedure. The teeth were divided randomly into 3 groups of 15 teeth. Group 1 was treated with prophylaxis with a rubber cup and pumice, Group 2 with prophylaxis with a rubber cup and nonfluoridated paste, and Group 3 with prophylaxis with a rubber cup and fluoridated paste. After thermocycling, the samples were sheared in the Instron. Results, in MPa, were: Group 1: 14.70 +/- 4.44, Group 2:15.82 +/- 2.70, and Group 3: 16.41 +/- 5.93. Analysis of variance showed no difference among the three groups.",
author = "Franklin Garcia-Godoy and O'Quinn, {J. A.}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "557--559",
journal = "General Dentistry",
issn = "0363-6771",
publisher = "Academy of General Dentistry",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of prophylactic agents on shear bond strength of resin composite bonding to enamel

AU - Garcia-Godoy, Franklin

AU - O'Quinn, J. A.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - In this study, the effect of different tooth cleansing methods on shear bond strength of resin composite bonding to enamel was evaluated. The buccal enamel surface of 45 noncarious permanent molars was ground flat to provide a uniform surface to which composite was applied. Care was taken to avoid dentin exposure in this procedure. The teeth were divided randomly into 3 groups of 15 teeth. Group 1 was treated with prophylaxis with a rubber cup and pumice, Group 2 with prophylaxis with a rubber cup and nonfluoridated paste, and Group 3 with prophylaxis with a rubber cup and fluoridated paste. After thermocycling, the samples were sheared in the Instron. Results, in MPa, were: Group 1: 14.70 +/- 4.44, Group 2:15.82 +/- 2.70, and Group 3: 16.41 +/- 5.93. Analysis of variance showed no difference among the three groups.

AB - In this study, the effect of different tooth cleansing methods on shear bond strength of resin composite bonding to enamel was evaluated. The buccal enamel surface of 45 noncarious permanent molars was ground flat to provide a uniform surface to which composite was applied. Care was taken to avoid dentin exposure in this procedure. The teeth were divided randomly into 3 groups of 15 teeth. Group 1 was treated with prophylaxis with a rubber cup and pumice, Group 2 with prophylaxis with a rubber cup and nonfluoridated paste, and Group 3 with prophylaxis with a rubber cup and fluoridated paste. After thermocycling, the samples were sheared in the Instron. Results, in MPa, were: Group 1: 14.70 +/- 4.44, Group 2:15.82 +/- 2.70, and Group 3: 16.41 +/- 5.93. Analysis of variance showed no difference among the three groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926130967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926130967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 557

EP - 559

JO - General Dentistry

JF - General Dentistry

SN - 0363-6771

IS - 6

ER -