Electrode placement significantly affects transthoracic atrial defibrillation thresholds

L. C. Hunt, Amy Curry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Placement of external electrodes can significantly affect the success rate of transthoracic atrial defibrillation, but clinical studies have not led to agreement on optimal electrode placements. This study uses an anatomically realistic, finite element model of the human torso for external atrial defibrillation to (1) investigate model parameters of skeletal muscle conductivity and anisotropy and the presence of subcutaneous fat and (2) investigate clinical defibrillation parameters of electrode size, shape, and location. Methods: The model computes electric fields in the atria given electrode location, applied voltage, and tissue conductivities. The model predicts atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) energy by requiring a voltage gradient of 5 V/cm over at least 95% of atrial myocardium. Results: The results compare favorably with a clinical study of 301 patients that reported an anterior-posterior (AP) electrode position required approximately 20% less energy than an anterior-anterior (AA) position. Results indicate that a change in electrode size has a different effect for AA compared to AP electrode placements. This study finds that variation in electrode placement by only a few centimeters can change ADFTs by up to 51%. Conclusion: This is the first computer model of transthoracic atrial defibrillation to our knowledge. The sensitivity of defibrillation thresholds to small shifts in electrode placement may account for the disagreement between clinical studies on optimal electrode placements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)62-68
Number of pages7
JournalCardiovascular Engineering
Volume10
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 7 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electrodes
Torso
Subcutaneous Fat
Anisotropy
Computer Simulation
Myocardium
Skeletal Muscle
Clinical Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Electrode placement significantly affects transthoracic atrial defibrillation thresholds. / Hunt, L. C.; Curry, Amy.

In: Cardiovascular Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 1, 07.03.2005, p. 62-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fbe4d9519530414085b2753935a2c25d,
title = "Electrode placement significantly affects transthoracic atrial defibrillation thresholds",
abstract = "Background: Placement of external electrodes can significantly affect the success rate of transthoracic atrial defibrillation, but clinical studies have not led to agreement on optimal electrode placements. This study uses an anatomically realistic, finite element model of the human torso for external atrial defibrillation to (1) investigate model parameters of skeletal muscle conductivity and anisotropy and the presence of subcutaneous fat and (2) investigate clinical defibrillation parameters of electrode size, shape, and location. Methods: The model computes electric fields in the atria given electrode location, applied voltage, and tissue conductivities. The model predicts atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) energy by requiring a voltage gradient of 5 V/cm over at least 95{\%} of atrial myocardium. Results: The results compare favorably with a clinical study of 301 patients that reported an anterior-posterior (AP) electrode position required approximately 20{\%} less energy than an anterior-anterior (AA) position. Results indicate that a change in electrode size has a different effect for AA compared to AP electrode placements. This study finds that variation in electrode placement by only a few centimeters can change ADFTs by up to 51{\%}. Conclusion: This is the first computer model of transthoracic atrial defibrillation to our knowledge. The sensitivity of defibrillation thresholds to small shifts in electrode placement may account for the disagreement between clinical studies on optimal electrode placements.",
author = "Hunt, {L. C.} and Amy Curry",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
day = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "62--68",
journal = "Cardiovascular Engineering",
issn = "1432-9077",
publisher = "Pabst Science Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrode placement significantly affects transthoracic atrial defibrillation thresholds

AU - Hunt, L. C.

AU - Curry, Amy

PY - 2005/3/7

Y1 - 2005/3/7

N2 - Background: Placement of external electrodes can significantly affect the success rate of transthoracic atrial defibrillation, but clinical studies have not led to agreement on optimal electrode placements. This study uses an anatomically realistic, finite element model of the human torso for external atrial defibrillation to (1) investigate model parameters of skeletal muscle conductivity and anisotropy and the presence of subcutaneous fat and (2) investigate clinical defibrillation parameters of electrode size, shape, and location. Methods: The model computes electric fields in the atria given electrode location, applied voltage, and tissue conductivities. The model predicts atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) energy by requiring a voltage gradient of 5 V/cm over at least 95% of atrial myocardium. Results: The results compare favorably with a clinical study of 301 patients that reported an anterior-posterior (AP) electrode position required approximately 20% less energy than an anterior-anterior (AA) position. Results indicate that a change in electrode size has a different effect for AA compared to AP electrode placements. This study finds that variation in electrode placement by only a few centimeters can change ADFTs by up to 51%. Conclusion: This is the first computer model of transthoracic atrial defibrillation to our knowledge. The sensitivity of defibrillation thresholds to small shifts in electrode placement may account for the disagreement between clinical studies on optimal electrode placements.

AB - Background: Placement of external electrodes can significantly affect the success rate of transthoracic atrial defibrillation, but clinical studies have not led to agreement on optimal electrode placements. This study uses an anatomically realistic, finite element model of the human torso for external atrial defibrillation to (1) investigate model parameters of skeletal muscle conductivity and anisotropy and the presence of subcutaneous fat and (2) investigate clinical defibrillation parameters of electrode size, shape, and location. Methods: The model computes electric fields in the atria given electrode location, applied voltage, and tissue conductivities. The model predicts atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) energy by requiring a voltage gradient of 5 V/cm over at least 95% of atrial myocardium. Results: The results compare favorably with a clinical study of 301 patients that reported an anterior-posterior (AP) electrode position required approximately 20% less energy than an anterior-anterior (AA) position. Results indicate that a change in electrode size has a different effect for AA compared to AP electrode placements. This study finds that variation in electrode placement by only a few centimeters can change ADFTs by up to 51%. Conclusion: This is the first computer model of transthoracic atrial defibrillation to our knowledge. The sensitivity of defibrillation thresholds to small shifts in electrode placement may account for the disagreement between clinical studies on optimal electrode placements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14044276263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14044276263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 62

EP - 68

JO - Cardiovascular Engineering

JF - Cardiovascular Engineering

SN - 1432-9077

IS - 1

ER -