“Enhanced recovery” protocol compliance influences length of stay

Resolving barriers to implementation

Evon Zoog, Remil Simon, John Stanley, Richard Moore, Shauna Lorenzo-Rivero, Brian Shepherd, Cuilan Gao, Eric Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Initial implementation and maintenance of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) is complex and has not been adequately described. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an ERP at a tertiary care academic institution. A secondary aim was to identify barriers to implementation and continued protocol compliance (PC) to further decrease length of stay (LOS). Patients undergoing colon resection from February 2, 2011 to December 19, 2014 were compared with patients that followed implementation of an ERP from August 10, 2015 to July 14, 2016. The primary endpoint was LOS. Secondary endpoints were PC, analgesia requirements, time to return of bowel function, and ileus. One hundred and seventy-seven historical controls were compared with 68 ERP patients. LOS was shorter in study patients (4.9 vs 7.1 days for open surgery; 3.3 vs 6.1 for laparoscopic surgery). Intraoperative IVF balance, morphine equivalents, and length of time to return of bowel function were significantly less in the ERP group (1445.89 6 845.25 mL vs 3006.08 6 1197.97 mL), (64.48 6 114.49 vs 232.90 6 541.47), (2.41 6 1.32 days vs 3.82 6 2.00 days). Rate of ileus was less in study patients (4.8 vs 14.7%). The readmission rate and 30-day National Surgical Quality Improvement Program complication rates were not significantly different. PC was negatively associated with LOS (r 5 20.35, P 5 0.0026). Similar to prior studies, this study demonstrates the efficacy of an ERP. Increased PC is associated with decreased LOS, thus providing further evidence that ERPs should be the standard of care. Scheduled interdisciplinary meetings to discuss patient outcomes and methods to increase PC can help further improve efficacy of ERPs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)808-812
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Surgeon
Volume84
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Guideline Adherence
Length of Stay
Ileus
Tertiary Healthcare
Standard of Care
Quality Improvement
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Laparoscopy
Analgesia
Morphine
Colon
Maintenance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Zoog, E., Simon, R., Stanley, J., Moore, R., Lorenzo-Rivero, S., Shepherd, B., ... Nelson, E. (2018). “Enhanced recovery” protocol compliance influences length of stay: Resolving barriers to implementation. American Surgeon, 84(6), 808-812.

“Enhanced recovery” protocol compliance influences length of stay : Resolving barriers to implementation. / Zoog, Evon; Simon, Remil; Stanley, John; Moore, Richard; Lorenzo-Rivero, Shauna; Shepherd, Brian; Gao, Cuilan; Nelson, Eric.

In: American Surgeon, Vol. 84, No. 6, 01.06.2018, p. 808-812.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zoog, E, Simon, R, Stanley, J, Moore, R, Lorenzo-Rivero, S, Shepherd, B, Gao, C & Nelson, E 2018, '“Enhanced recovery” protocol compliance influences length of stay: Resolving barriers to implementation', American Surgeon, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 808-812.
Zoog E, Simon R, Stanley J, Moore R, Lorenzo-Rivero S, Shepherd B et al. “Enhanced recovery” protocol compliance influences length of stay: Resolving barriers to implementation. American Surgeon. 2018 Jun 1;84(6):808-812.
Zoog, Evon ; Simon, Remil ; Stanley, John ; Moore, Richard ; Lorenzo-Rivero, Shauna ; Shepherd, Brian ; Gao, Cuilan ; Nelson, Eric. / “Enhanced recovery” protocol compliance influences length of stay : Resolving barriers to implementation. In: American Surgeon. 2018 ; Vol. 84, No. 6. pp. 808-812.
@article{8e0cfd80feee4b0a8d1ca3a95d851963,
title = "“Enhanced recovery” protocol compliance influences length of stay: Resolving barriers to implementation",
abstract = "Initial implementation and maintenance of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) is complex and has not been adequately described. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an ERP at a tertiary care academic institution. A secondary aim was to identify barriers to implementation and continued protocol compliance (PC) to further decrease length of stay (LOS). Patients undergoing colon resection from February 2, 2011 to December 19, 2014 were compared with patients that followed implementation of an ERP from August 10, 2015 to July 14, 2016. The primary endpoint was LOS. Secondary endpoints were PC, analgesia requirements, time to return of bowel function, and ileus. One hundred and seventy-seven historical controls were compared with 68 ERP patients. LOS was shorter in study patients (4.9 vs 7.1 days for open surgery; 3.3 vs 6.1 for laparoscopic surgery). Intraoperative IVF balance, morphine equivalents, and length of time to return of bowel function were significantly less in the ERP group (1445.89 6 845.25 mL vs 3006.08 6 1197.97 mL), (64.48 6 114.49 vs 232.90 6 541.47), (2.41 6 1.32 days vs 3.82 6 2.00 days). Rate of ileus was less in study patients (4.8 vs 14.7{\%}). The readmission rate and 30-day National Surgical Quality Improvement Program complication rates were not significantly different. PC was negatively associated with LOS (r 5 20.35, P 5 0.0026). Similar to prior studies, this study demonstrates the efficacy of an ERP. Increased PC is associated with decreased LOS, thus providing further evidence that ERPs should be the standard of care. Scheduled interdisciplinary meetings to discuss patient outcomes and methods to increase PC can help further improve efficacy of ERPs.",
author = "Evon Zoog and Remil Simon and John Stanley and Richard Moore and Shauna Lorenzo-Rivero and Brian Shepherd and Cuilan Gao and Eric Nelson",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "808--812",
journal = "American Surgeon",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "Southeastern Surgical Congress",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Enhanced recovery” protocol compliance influences length of stay

T2 - Resolving barriers to implementation

AU - Zoog, Evon

AU - Simon, Remil

AU - Stanley, John

AU - Moore, Richard

AU - Lorenzo-Rivero, Shauna

AU - Shepherd, Brian

AU - Gao, Cuilan

AU - Nelson, Eric

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Initial implementation and maintenance of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) is complex and has not been adequately described. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an ERP at a tertiary care academic institution. A secondary aim was to identify barriers to implementation and continued protocol compliance (PC) to further decrease length of stay (LOS). Patients undergoing colon resection from February 2, 2011 to December 19, 2014 were compared with patients that followed implementation of an ERP from August 10, 2015 to July 14, 2016. The primary endpoint was LOS. Secondary endpoints were PC, analgesia requirements, time to return of bowel function, and ileus. One hundred and seventy-seven historical controls were compared with 68 ERP patients. LOS was shorter in study patients (4.9 vs 7.1 days for open surgery; 3.3 vs 6.1 for laparoscopic surgery). Intraoperative IVF balance, morphine equivalents, and length of time to return of bowel function were significantly less in the ERP group (1445.89 6 845.25 mL vs 3006.08 6 1197.97 mL), (64.48 6 114.49 vs 232.90 6 541.47), (2.41 6 1.32 days vs 3.82 6 2.00 days). Rate of ileus was less in study patients (4.8 vs 14.7%). The readmission rate and 30-day National Surgical Quality Improvement Program complication rates were not significantly different. PC was negatively associated with LOS (r 5 20.35, P 5 0.0026). Similar to prior studies, this study demonstrates the efficacy of an ERP. Increased PC is associated with decreased LOS, thus providing further evidence that ERPs should be the standard of care. Scheduled interdisciplinary meetings to discuss patient outcomes and methods to increase PC can help further improve efficacy of ERPs.

AB - Initial implementation and maintenance of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) is complex and has not been adequately described. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an ERP at a tertiary care academic institution. A secondary aim was to identify barriers to implementation and continued protocol compliance (PC) to further decrease length of stay (LOS). Patients undergoing colon resection from February 2, 2011 to December 19, 2014 were compared with patients that followed implementation of an ERP from August 10, 2015 to July 14, 2016. The primary endpoint was LOS. Secondary endpoints were PC, analgesia requirements, time to return of bowel function, and ileus. One hundred and seventy-seven historical controls were compared with 68 ERP patients. LOS was shorter in study patients (4.9 vs 7.1 days for open surgery; 3.3 vs 6.1 for laparoscopic surgery). Intraoperative IVF balance, morphine equivalents, and length of time to return of bowel function were significantly less in the ERP group (1445.89 6 845.25 mL vs 3006.08 6 1197.97 mL), (64.48 6 114.49 vs 232.90 6 541.47), (2.41 6 1.32 days vs 3.82 6 2.00 days). Rate of ileus was less in study patients (4.8 vs 14.7%). The readmission rate and 30-day National Surgical Quality Improvement Program complication rates were not significantly different. PC was negatively associated with LOS (r 5 20.35, P 5 0.0026). Similar to prior studies, this study demonstrates the efficacy of an ERP. Increased PC is associated with decreased LOS, thus providing further evidence that ERPs should be the standard of care. Scheduled interdisciplinary meetings to discuss patient outcomes and methods to increase PC can help further improve efficacy of ERPs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049686630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049686630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 808

EP - 812

JO - American Surgeon

JF - American Surgeon

SN - 0003-1348

IS - 6

ER -