Esophageal electric fields are predictive of atrial defibrillation thresholds

David A. Fitch, Judith Soberman, Amy Curry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia characterized by disorganized cardiac electrical activity. Defibrillation electrode placement has been shown to affect the amount of energy and number of shocks required to defibrillate. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between esophageal electric fields (EEFs) and atrial defibrillation thresholds (ADFTs) to determine the feasibility of using EEFs during a low-strength shock to predict patient-specific defibrillation electrode placements. Methods: AF was induced and defibrillated according to a Bayesian four-shock protocol for 12-electrode placements in six pigs. EEFs were measured during each of the four shocks of the protocol and during a 1-J shock for each electrode placement. Squared EEFs (EEF 2s) during all shocks were compared to the ADFTs using a linear regression. Results: There was a negative relationship between EEF 2s during the 1-J shocks and ADFTs, with median R 2 values of 0.863 and 0.840 for anterior-anterior (AA) and anterior-posterior (AP) electrode placements, respectively. There was a strong, positive relationship between applied energy and EEF 2s, with median R 2 values of at least 0.866 for all animals. The placement with the highest EEF 2 resulted in the lowest ADFT for both AA and AP placements in four of six pigs. In the other two animals, this held for one electrode set but not both. Conclusions: There was a strong negative relationship between EEF 2s during 1-J shocks and ADFTs for both AA and AP electrode placements. These preliminary results suggest that using EEF 2s to predict patient-specific electrode placements is feasible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)335-340
Number of pages6
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Shock
Electrodes
Atrial Fibrillation
Swine
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Linear Models

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Esophageal electric fields are predictive of atrial defibrillation thresholds. / Fitch, David A.; Soberman, Judith; Curry, Amy.

In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 35, No. 3, 01.03.2012, p. 335-340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0c9ffa5e277140eca3ad36be9323489a,
title = "Esophageal electric fields are predictive of atrial defibrillation thresholds",
abstract = "Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia characterized by disorganized cardiac electrical activity. Defibrillation electrode placement has been shown to affect the amount of energy and number of shocks required to defibrillate. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between esophageal electric fields (EEFs) and atrial defibrillation thresholds (ADFTs) to determine the feasibility of using EEFs during a low-strength shock to predict patient-specific defibrillation electrode placements. Methods: AF was induced and defibrillated according to a Bayesian four-shock protocol for 12-electrode placements in six pigs. EEFs were measured during each of the four shocks of the protocol and during a 1-J shock for each electrode placement. Squared EEFs (EEF 2s) during all shocks were compared to the ADFTs using a linear regression. Results: There was a negative relationship between EEF 2s during the 1-J shocks and ADFTs, with median R 2 values of 0.863 and 0.840 for anterior-anterior (AA) and anterior-posterior (AP) electrode placements, respectively. There was a strong, positive relationship between applied energy and EEF 2s, with median R 2 values of at least 0.866 for all animals. The placement with the highest EEF 2 resulted in the lowest ADFT for both AA and AP placements in four of six pigs. In the other two animals, this held for one electrode set but not both. Conclusions: There was a strong negative relationship between EEF 2s during 1-J shocks and ADFTs for both AA and AP electrode placements. These preliminary results suggest that using EEF 2s to predict patient-specific electrode placements is feasible.",
author = "Fitch, {David A.} and Judith Soberman and Amy Curry",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03291.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "335--340",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Esophageal electric fields are predictive of atrial defibrillation thresholds

AU - Fitch, David A.

AU - Soberman, Judith

AU - Curry, Amy

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia characterized by disorganized cardiac electrical activity. Defibrillation electrode placement has been shown to affect the amount of energy and number of shocks required to defibrillate. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between esophageal electric fields (EEFs) and atrial defibrillation thresholds (ADFTs) to determine the feasibility of using EEFs during a low-strength shock to predict patient-specific defibrillation electrode placements. Methods: AF was induced and defibrillated according to a Bayesian four-shock protocol for 12-electrode placements in six pigs. EEFs were measured during each of the four shocks of the protocol and during a 1-J shock for each electrode placement. Squared EEFs (EEF 2s) during all shocks were compared to the ADFTs using a linear regression. Results: There was a negative relationship between EEF 2s during the 1-J shocks and ADFTs, with median R 2 values of 0.863 and 0.840 for anterior-anterior (AA) and anterior-posterior (AP) electrode placements, respectively. There was a strong, positive relationship between applied energy and EEF 2s, with median R 2 values of at least 0.866 for all animals. The placement with the highest EEF 2 resulted in the lowest ADFT for both AA and AP placements in four of six pigs. In the other two animals, this held for one electrode set but not both. Conclusions: There was a strong negative relationship between EEF 2s during 1-J shocks and ADFTs for both AA and AP electrode placements. These preliminary results suggest that using EEF 2s to predict patient-specific electrode placements is feasible.

AB - Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia characterized by disorganized cardiac electrical activity. Defibrillation electrode placement has been shown to affect the amount of energy and number of shocks required to defibrillate. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between esophageal electric fields (EEFs) and atrial defibrillation thresholds (ADFTs) to determine the feasibility of using EEFs during a low-strength shock to predict patient-specific defibrillation electrode placements. Methods: AF was induced and defibrillated according to a Bayesian four-shock protocol for 12-electrode placements in six pigs. EEFs were measured during each of the four shocks of the protocol and during a 1-J shock for each electrode placement. Squared EEFs (EEF 2s) during all shocks were compared to the ADFTs using a linear regression. Results: There was a negative relationship between EEF 2s during the 1-J shocks and ADFTs, with median R 2 values of 0.863 and 0.840 for anterior-anterior (AA) and anterior-posterior (AP) electrode placements, respectively. There was a strong, positive relationship between applied energy and EEF 2s, with median R 2 values of at least 0.866 for all animals. The placement with the highest EEF 2 resulted in the lowest ADFT for both AA and AP placements in four of six pigs. In the other two animals, this held for one electrode set but not both. Conclusions: There was a strong negative relationship between EEF 2s during 1-J shocks and ADFTs for both AA and AP electrode placements. These preliminary results suggest that using EEF 2s to predict patient-specific electrode placements is feasible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858000862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858000862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03291.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03291.x

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 335

EP - 340

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

IS - 3

ER -