EUS-guided drainage of bilomas: a new alternative?

Vanessa M. Shami, Jayant P. Talreja, Anshu Mahajan, Melissa Lapinska, Paul Yeaton, Michel Kahaleh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Bilomas have traditionally been treated by either percutaneous drainage or surgery. However, percutaneous drainage is associated with discomfort and infection, whereas surgery, which is usually reserved for refractory cases, has high morbidity and mortality rates. Recently, endoscopic drainage of bilomas adjacent to the GI lumen has been reported in isolated reports. Objective: We analyzed our 4 years' experience with this innovative technique. Design: Patients with symptomatic bilomas were offered EUS-guided drainage and were followed up prospectively for clinical and radiologic responses. Setting: Tertiary care center with long-standing experience in EUS-guided drainage. Patients: A total of 5 patients underwent EUS-guided transenteric drainage of symptomatic bilomas. Intervention: The technique included transenteric EUS-guided puncture, placement of a guidewire into the biloma, and creation of an enteral-biloma fistula with placement of a plastic endoprosthesis after balloon dilation. In 4 cases, the stents were removed at a mean of 6.8 ± 4.3 weeks. In one patient with malignancy, the stent was left in place for palliation. Main Outcome Measurements: Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided drainage of bilomas. Results: EUS-guided transenteric biloma drainage was successfully performed in 5 patients without any significant morbidity. Biloma resolution was confirmed in all 5 patients, and none of the 4 patients relapsed after stent removal (mean follow-up of 12.8 ± 6.1 months). Conclusions: EUS-guided drainage of bilomas is technically feasible, appears safe, and provides an attractive alternative to percutaneous or surgical drainage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)136-140
Number of pages5
JournalGastrointestinal endoscopy
Volume67
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Drainage
Stents
Morbidity
Punctures
Tertiary Care Centers
Plastics
Small Intestine
Fistula
Dilatation
Safety
Mortality
Infection

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Shami, V. M., Talreja, J. P., Mahajan, A., Lapinska, M., Yeaton, P., & Kahaleh, M. (2008). EUS-guided drainage of bilomas: a new alternative? Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 67(1), 136-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.040

EUS-guided drainage of bilomas : a new alternative? / Shami, Vanessa M.; Talreja, Jayant P.; Mahajan, Anshu; Lapinska, Melissa; Yeaton, Paul; Kahaleh, Michel.

In: Gastrointestinal endoscopy, Vol. 67, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 136-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shami, VM, Talreja, JP, Mahajan, A, Lapinska, M, Yeaton, P & Kahaleh, M 2008, 'EUS-guided drainage of bilomas: a new alternative?', Gastrointestinal endoscopy, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 136-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.040
Shami, Vanessa M. ; Talreja, Jayant P. ; Mahajan, Anshu ; Lapinska, Melissa ; Yeaton, Paul ; Kahaleh, Michel. / EUS-guided drainage of bilomas : a new alternative?. In: Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2008 ; Vol. 67, No. 1. pp. 136-140.
@article{d926c8eb82ae40a9b85a631fad5c0f53,
title = "EUS-guided drainage of bilomas: a new alternative?",
abstract = "Background: Bilomas have traditionally been treated by either percutaneous drainage or surgery. However, percutaneous drainage is associated with discomfort and infection, whereas surgery, which is usually reserved for refractory cases, has high morbidity and mortality rates. Recently, endoscopic drainage of bilomas adjacent to the GI lumen has been reported in isolated reports. Objective: We analyzed our 4 years' experience with this innovative technique. Design: Patients with symptomatic bilomas were offered EUS-guided drainage and were followed up prospectively for clinical and radiologic responses. Setting: Tertiary care center with long-standing experience in EUS-guided drainage. Patients: A total of 5 patients underwent EUS-guided transenteric drainage of symptomatic bilomas. Intervention: The technique included transenteric EUS-guided puncture, placement of a guidewire into the biloma, and creation of an enteral-biloma fistula with placement of a plastic endoprosthesis after balloon dilation. In 4 cases, the stents were removed at a mean of 6.8 ± 4.3 weeks. In one patient with malignancy, the stent was left in place for palliation. Main Outcome Measurements: Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided drainage of bilomas. Results: EUS-guided transenteric biloma drainage was successfully performed in 5 patients without any significant morbidity. Biloma resolution was confirmed in all 5 patients, and none of the 4 patients relapsed after stent removal (mean follow-up of 12.8 ± 6.1 months). Conclusions: EUS-guided drainage of bilomas is technically feasible, appears safe, and provides an attractive alternative to percutaneous or surgical drainage.",
author = "Shami, {Vanessa M.} and Talreja, {Jayant P.} and Anshu Mahajan and Melissa Lapinska and Paul Yeaton and Michel Kahaleh",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.040",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "136--140",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - EUS-guided drainage of bilomas

T2 - a new alternative?

AU - Shami, Vanessa M.

AU - Talreja, Jayant P.

AU - Mahajan, Anshu

AU - Lapinska, Melissa

AU - Yeaton, Paul

AU - Kahaleh, Michel

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Background: Bilomas have traditionally been treated by either percutaneous drainage or surgery. However, percutaneous drainage is associated with discomfort and infection, whereas surgery, which is usually reserved for refractory cases, has high morbidity and mortality rates. Recently, endoscopic drainage of bilomas adjacent to the GI lumen has been reported in isolated reports. Objective: We analyzed our 4 years' experience with this innovative technique. Design: Patients with symptomatic bilomas were offered EUS-guided drainage and were followed up prospectively for clinical and radiologic responses. Setting: Tertiary care center with long-standing experience in EUS-guided drainage. Patients: A total of 5 patients underwent EUS-guided transenteric drainage of symptomatic bilomas. Intervention: The technique included transenteric EUS-guided puncture, placement of a guidewire into the biloma, and creation of an enteral-biloma fistula with placement of a plastic endoprosthesis after balloon dilation. In 4 cases, the stents were removed at a mean of 6.8 ± 4.3 weeks. In one patient with malignancy, the stent was left in place for palliation. Main Outcome Measurements: Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided drainage of bilomas. Results: EUS-guided transenteric biloma drainage was successfully performed in 5 patients without any significant morbidity. Biloma resolution was confirmed in all 5 patients, and none of the 4 patients relapsed after stent removal (mean follow-up of 12.8 ± 6.1 months). Conclusions: EUS-guided drainage of bilomas is technically feasible, appears safe, and provides an attractive alternative to percutaneous or surgical drainage.

AB - Background: Bilomas have traditionally been treated by either percutaneous drainage or surgery. However, percutaneous drainage is associated with discomfort and infection, whereas surgery, which is usually reserved for refractory cases, has high morbidity and mortality rates. Recently, endoscopic drainage of bilomas adjacent to the GI lumen has been reported in isolated reports. Objective: We analyzed our 4 years' experience with this innovative technique. Design: Patients with symptomatic bilomas were offered EUS-guided drainage and were followed up prospectively for clinical and radiologic responses. Setting: Tertiary care center with long-standing experience in EUS-guided drainage. Patients: A total of 5 patients underwent EUS-guided transenteric drainage of symptomatic bilomas. Intervention: The technique included transenteric EUS-guided puncture, placement of a guidewire into the biloma, and creation of an enteral-biloma fistula with placement of a plastic endoprosthesis after balloon dilation. In 4 cases, the stents were removed at a mean of 6.8 ± 4.3 weeks. In one patient with malignancy, the stent was left in place for palliation. Main Outcome Measurements: Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided drainage of bilomas. Results: EUS-guided transenteric biloma drainage was successfully performed in 5 patients without any significant morbidity. Biloma resolution was confirmed in all 5 patients, and none of the 4 patients relapsed after stent removal (mean follow-up of 12.8 ± 6.1 months). Conclusions: EUS-guided drainage of bilomas is technically feasible, appears safe, and provides an attractive alternative to percutaneous or surgical drainage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37249062329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37249062329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.040

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.040

M3 - Article

C2 - 18155436

AN - SCOPUS:37249062329

VL - 67

SP - 136

EP - 140

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 1

ER -