Evaluation of an image-guided, robotically positioned transcranial magnetic stimulation system

Jack L. Lancaster, Shalini Narayana, Dennis Wenzel, James Luckemeyer, John Roby, Peter Fox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The emergence of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a tool for investigating the brain has been remarkable over the past decade. While many centers are now using TMS, little has been done to automate the delivery of planned TMS stimulation for research and/or clinical use. We report on an image-guided robotically positioned TMS system (irTMS) developed for this purpose. Stimulation sites are selected from functional images overlaid onto anatomical MR images, and the system calculates a treatment plan and robotically positions the TMS coil following that plan. A new theory, stating that cortical response to TMS is highest when the induced E-field is oriented parallel to cortical columns, is used by the irTMS system for planning the position and orientation of the TMS coil. This automated approach to TMS planning and delivery provides a consistent and optimized method for TMS stimulation of cortical regions of the brain. We evaluated the positional accuracy and utility of the irTMS system with a B-shaped TMS coil. Treatment plans were evaluated for sites widely distributed about a head phantom with well-defined landmarks. The overall accuracy in positioning the planned site of the TMS coil was approximately 2 mm, similar to that reported for the robot alone. The estimated maximum range of error in planned vs. delivered E-field strength was +4%, suggesting a high degree of accuracy and reproducibility in the planned use of the irTMS system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-340
Number of pages12
JournalHuman Brain Mapping
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Brain
Head

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Evaluation of an image-guided, robotically positioned transcranial magnetic stimulation system. / Lancaster, Jack L.; Narayana, Shalini; Wenzel, Dennis; Luckemeyer, James; Roby, John; Fox, Peter.

In: Human Brain Mapping, Vol. 22, No. 4, 08.2004, p. 329-340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lancaster, Jack L. ; Narayana, Shalini ; Wenzel, Dennis ; Luckemeyer, James ; Roby, John ; Fox, Peter. / Evaluation of an image-guided, robotically positioned transcranial magnetic stimulation system. In: Human Brain Mapping. 2004 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 329-340.
@article{ffc818780a52434d90ba5437ef8f13f2,
title = "Evaluation of an image-guided, robotically positioned transcranial magnetic stimulation system",
abstract = "The emergence of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a tool for investigating the brain has been remarkable over the past decade. While many centers are now using TMS, little has been done to automate the delivery of planned TMS stimulation for research and/or clinical use. We report on an image-guided robotically positioned TMS system (irTMS) developed for this purpose. Stimulation sites are selected from functional images overlaid onto anatomical MR images, and the system calculates a treatment plan and robotically positions the TMS coil following that plan. A new theory, stating that cortical response to TMS is highest when the induced E-field is oriented parallel to cortical columns, is used by the irTMS system for planning the position and orientation of the TMS coil. This automated approach to TMS planning and delivery provides a consistent and optimized method for TMS stimulation of cortical regions of the brain. We evaluated the positional accuracy and utility of the irTMS system with a B-shaped TMS coil. Treatment plans were evaluated for sites widely distributed about a head phantom with well-defined landmarks. The overall accuracy in positioning the planned site of the TMS coil was approximately 2 mm, similar to that reported for the robot alone. The estimated maximum range of error in planned vs. delivered E-field strength was +4{\%}, suggesting a high degree of accuracy and reproducibility in the planned use of the irTMS system.",
author = "Lancaster, {Jack L.} and Shalini Narayana and Dennis Wenzel and James Luckemeyer and John Roby and Peter Fox",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1002/hbm.20041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "329--340",
journal = "Human Brain Mapping",
issn = "1065-9471",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of an image-guided, robotically positioned transcranial magnetic stimulation system

AU - Lancaster, Jack L.

AU - Narayana, Shalini

AU - Wenzel, Dennis

AU - Luckemeyer, James

AU - Roby, John

AU - Fox, Peter

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - The emergence of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a tool for investigating the brain has been remarkable over the past decade. While many centers are now using TMS, little has been done to automate the delivery of planned TMS stimulation for research and/or clinical use. We report on an image-guided robotically positioned TMS system (irTMS) developed for this purpose. Stimulation sites are selected from functional images overlaid onto anatomical MR images, and the system calculates a treatment plan and robotically positions the TMS coil following that plan. A new theory, stating that cortical response to TMS is highest when the induced E-field is oriented parallel to cortical columns, is used by the irTMS system for planning the position and orientation of the TMS coil. This automated approach to TMS planning and delivery provides a consistent and optimized method for TMS stimulation of cortical regions of the brain. We evaluated the positional accuracy and utility of the irTMS system with a B-shaped TMS coil. Treatment plans were evaluated for sites widely distributed about a head phantom with well-defined landmarks. The overall accuracy in positioning the planned site of the TMS coil was approximately 2 mm, similar to that reported for the robot alone. The estimated maximum range of error in planned vs. delivered E-field strength was +4%, suggesting a high degree of accuracy and reproducibility in the planned use of the irTMS system.

AB - The emergence of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a tool for investigating the brain has been remarkable over the past decade. While many centers are now using TMS, little has been done to automate the delivery of planned TMS stimulation for research and/or clinical use. We report on an image-guided robotically positioned TMS system (irTMS) developed for this purpose. Stimulation sites are selected from functional images overlaid onto anatomical MR images, and the system calculates a treatment plan and robotically positions the TMS coil following that plan. A new theory, stating that cortical response to TMS is highest when the induced E-field is oriented parallel to cortical columns, is used by the irTMS system for planning the position and orientation of the TMS coil. This automated approach to TMS planning and delivery provides a consistent and optimized method for TMS stimulation of cortical regions of the brain. We evaluated the positional accuracy and utility of the irTMS system with a B-shaped TMS coil. Treatment plans were evaluated for sites widely distributed about a head phantom with well-defined landmarks. The overall accuracy in positioning the planned site of the TMS coil was approximately 2 mm, similar to that reported for the robot alone. The estimated maximum range of error in planned vs. delivered E-field strength was +4%, suggesting a high degree of accuracy and reproducibility in the planned use of the irTMS system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3843102878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3843102878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hbm.20041

DO - 10.1002/hbm.20041

M3 - Article

C2 - 15202111

AN - SCOPUS:3843102878

VL - 22

SP - 329

EP - 340

JO - Human Brain Mapping

JF - Human Brain Mapping

SN - 1065-9471

IS - 4

ER -