Evolution in management of adolescent blunt aortic injuries - A single institution 22-y experience

Adam S. Brinkman, Andrew P. Rogers, Charles W. Acher, Martha M. Wynn, Peter F. Nichol, Daniel J. Ostlie, Ankush Gosain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background In children, severe, life-threatening traumatic injuries of the thoracic aorta can be seen after motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) resulting in a sudden deceleration. Concurrent injuries in the thorax and abdomen can make treatment prioritization difficult and require early recognition and prompt intervention. With the increased utilization of minimally invasive endovascular approaches to traumatic aortic (TA) injuries, patients are often spared the increased surgical morbidity (spinal cord ischemia and renal insults) that can be seen with an open technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate a single American College of Surgeons level 1 pediatric trauma center's 22-y experience with TA injuries in children.

Methods After the Institutional Review Board approval, a 22-y (January 1990-April 2013) retrospective review of all pediatric trauma patients admitted with TA injuries was performed. Patient demographics including age, injury detail, treatment, and outcomes were recorded for analysis.

Results 17 children (<21-y old) were identified with ages ranging from 13-20 y old. The most common mechanism of injury was MVC with all 17 children sustaining TA injuries. The traumatic injuries included aortic transection (9), intimal flap (5), pseudoaneurysm (2), and contained thoracic rupture (1). All children were managed operatively with those before 2008 using an open technique. The endovascular approach was used in 7/17 (41%) cases with the median length of hospitalization 12 d versus 22.5 d using the open approach (P < 0.05). No child required conversion from an endovascular to an open technique for treatment of the aortic injury. There were no operative deaths, no procedure-related paraplegia and all children were discharged home from the hospital. Two children had mild mental deficits as a result of head trauma.

Conclusions TA injuries are an uncommon injury in children and can result from MVCs or other sudden deceleration mechanisms. Surgical intervention is required in most of the cases and can be performed safely and effectively with low morbidity using an endovascular approach, which is the evolving approach of choice for thoracic aortic injuries. Lengthy follow-up care is recommended in children treated with an endovascular device to monitor for endoleaks and device complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)523-527
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume193
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Nonpenetrating Wounds
Wounds and Injuries
Motor Vehicles
Deceleration
Thorax
Tunica Intima
Spinal Cord Ischemia
Pediatrics
Morbidity
Endoleak
Equipment and Supplies
Thoracic Injuries
Aftercare
Trauma Centers
Paraplegia
Research Ethics Committees
False Aneurysm
Thoracic Aorta
Craniocerebral Trauma
Abdomen

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Evolution in management of adolescent blunt aortic injuries - A single institution 22-y experience. / Brinkman, Adam S.; Rogers, Andrew P.; Acher, Charles W.; Wynn, Martha M.; Nichol, Peter F.; Ostlie, Daniel J.; Gosain, Ankush.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 193, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 523-527.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brinkman, Adam S. ; Rogers, Andrew P. ; Acher, Charles W. ; Wynn, Martha M. ; Nichol, Peter F. ; Ostlie, Daniel J. ; Gosain, Ankush. / Evolution in management of adolescent blunt aortic injuries - A single institution 22-y experience. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 2015 ; Vol. 193, No. 2. pp. 523-527.
@article{91d7ca17db904612ab1e5b6a74d1e1bc,
title = "Evolution in management of adolescent blunt aortic injuries - A single institution 22-y experience",
abstract = "Background In children, severe, life-threatening traumatic injuries of the thoracic aorta can be seen after motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) resulting in a sudden deceleration. Concurrent injuries in the thorax and abdomen can make treatment prioritization difficult and require early recognition and prompt intervention. With the increased utilization of minimally invasive endovascular approaches to traumatic aortic (TA) injuries, patients are often spared the increased surgical morbidity (spinal cord ischemia and renal insults) that can be seen with an open technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate a single American College of Surgeons level 1 pediatric trauma center's 22-y experience with TA injuries in children.Methods After the Institutional Review Board approval, a 22-y (January 1990-April 2013) retrospective review of all pediatric trauma patients admitted with TA injuries was performed. Patient demographics including age, injury detail, treatment, and outcomes were recorded for analysis.Results 17 children (<21-y old) were identified with ages ranging from 13-20 y old. The most common mechanism of injury was MVC with all 17 children sustaining TA injuries. The traumatic injuries included aortic transection (9), intimal flap (5), pseudoaneurysm (2), and contained thoracic rupture (1). All children were managed operatively with those before 2008 using an open technique. The endovascular approach was used in 7/17 (41{\%}) cases with the median length of hospitalization 12 d versus 22.5 d using the open approach (P < 0.05). No child required conversion from an endovascular to an open technique for treatment of the aortic injury. There were no operative deaths, no procedure-related paraplegia and all children were discharged home from the hospital. Two children had mild mental deficits as a result of head trauma.Conclusions TA injuries are an uncommon injury in children and can result from MVCs or other sudden deceleration mechanisms. Surgical intervention is required in most of the cases and can be performed safely and effectively with low morbidity using an endovascular approach, which is the evolving approach of choice for thoracic aortic injuries. Lengthy follow-up care is recommended in children treated with an endovascular device to monitor for endoleaks and device complications.",
author = "Brinkman, {Adam S.} and Rogers, {Andrew P.} and Acher, {Charles W.} and Wynn, {Martha M.} and Nichol, {Peter F.} and Ostlie, {Daniel J.} and Ankush Gosain",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2014.08.058",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "193",
pages = "523--527",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolution in management of adolescent blunt aortic injuries - A single institution 22-y experience

AU - Brinkman, Adam S.

AU - Rogers, Andrew P.

AU - Acher, Charles W.

AU - Wynn, Martha M.

AU - Nichol, Peter F.

AU - Ostlie, Daniel J.

AU - Gosain, Ankush

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Background In children, severe, life-threatening traumatic injuries of the thoracic aorta can be seen after motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) resulting in a sudden deceleration. Concurrent injuries in the thorax and abdomen can make treatment prioritization difficult and require early recognition and prompt intervention. With the increased utilization of minimally invasive endovascular approaches to traumatic aortic (TA) injuries, patients are often spared the increased surgical morbidity (spinal cord ischemia and renal insults) that can be seen with an open technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate a single American College of Surgeons level 1 pediatric trauma center's 22-y experience with TA injuries in children.Methods After the Institutional Review Board approval, a 22-y (January 1990-April 2013) retrospective review of all pediatric trauma patients admitted with TA injuries was performed. Patient demographics including age, injury detail, treatment, and outcomes were recorded for analysis.Results 17 children (<21-y old) were identified with ages ranging from 13-20 y old. The most common mechanism of injury was MVC with all 17 children sustaining TA injuries. The traumatic injuries included aortic transection (9), intimal flap (5), pseudoaneurysm (2), and contained thoracic rupture (1). All children were managed operatively with those before 2008 using an open technique. The endovascular approach was used in 7/17 (41%) cases with the median length of hospitalization 12 d versus 22.5 d using the open approach (P < 0.05). No child required conversion from an endovascular to an open technique for treatment of the aortic injury. There were no operative deaths, no procedure-related paraplegia and all children were discharged home from the hospital. Two children had mild mental deficits as a result of head trauma.Conclusions TA injuries are an uncommon injury in children and can result from MVCs or other sudden deceleration mechanisms. Surgical intervention is required in most of the cases and can be performed safely and effectively with low morbidity using an endovascular approach, which is the evolving approach of choice for thoracic aortic injuries. Lengthy follow-up care is recommended in children treated with an endovascular device to monitor for endoleaks and device complications.

AB - Background In children, severe, life-threatening traumatic injuries of the thoracic aorta can be seen after motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) resulting in a sudden deceleration. Concurrent injuries in the thorax and abdomen can make treatment prioritization difficult and require early recognition and prompt intervention. With the increased utilization of minimally invasive endovascular approaches to traumatic aortic (TA) injuries, patients are often spared the increased surgical morbidity (spinal cord ischemia and renal insults) that can be seen with an open technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate a single American College of Surgeons level 1 pediatric trauma center's 22-y experience with TA injuries in children.Methods After the Institutional Review Board approval, a 22-y (January 1990-April 2013) retrospective review of all pediatric trauma patients admitted with TA injuries was performed. Patient demographics including age, injury detail, treatment, and outcomes were recorded for analysis.Results 17 children (<21-y old) were identified with ages ranging from 13-20 y old. The most common mechanism of injury was MVC with all 17 children sustaining TA injuries. The traumatic injuries included aortic transection (9), intimal flap (5), pseudoaneurysm (2), and contained thoracic rupture (1). All children were managed operatively with those before 2008 using an open technique. The endovascular approach was used in 7/17 (41%) cases with the median length of hospitalization 12 d versus 22.5 d using the open approach (P < 0.05). No child required conversion from an endovascular to an open technique for treatment of the aortic injury. There were no operative deaths, no procedure-related paraplegia and all children were discharged home from the hospital. Two children had mild mental deficits as a result of head trauma.Conclusions TA injuries are an uncommon injury in children and can result from MVCs or other sudden deceleration mechanisms. Surgical intervention is required in most of the cases and can be performed safely and effectively with low morbidity using an endovascular approach, which is the evolving approach of choice for thoracic aortic injuries. Lengthy follow-up care is recommended in children treated with an endovascular device to monitor for endoleaks and device complications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84917737243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84917737243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2014.08.058

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2014.08.058

M3 - Article

C2 - 25281286

AN - SCOPUS:84917737243

VL - 193

SP - 523

EP - 527

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 2

ER -