Feasibility of Telementoring for Microneurosurgical Procedures Using a Microscope

A Proof-of-Concept Study

Bryan M. Ladd, Ryan D. Tackla, Akshay Gupte, David Darrow, Jeffrey Sorenson, Mario Zuccarello, Andrew W. Grande

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Our pilot study evaluated the effectiveness of our telementoring-telescripting model to facilitate seamless communication between surgeons while the operating surgeon is using a microscope. Methods As a first proof of concept, 4 students identified 20 anatomic landmarks on a dry human skull with or without telementoring guidance. To assess the ability to communicate operative information, a senior neurosurgery resident evaluated the student's ability and timing to complete a stepwise craniotomy on a cadaveric head, with and without telementoring guidance; a second portion included exposure of the anterior circulation. The mentor was able to annotate directly onto the operator's visual field, which was visible to the operator without looking away from the binocular view. Results The students showed that they were familiar with half (50% ± 10%) of the structures for identification and none was familiar with the steps to complete a craniotomy before using our system. With the guidance of a remote surgeon projected into the visual field of the microscope, the students were able to correctly identify 100% of the structures and complete a craniotomy. Our system also proved effective in guiding a more experienced neurosurgery resident through complex operative steps associated with exposure of the anterior circulation. Conclusions Our pilot study showed a platform feasible in providing effective operative direction to inexperienced operators while operating using a microscope. A remote mentor was able to view the visual field of the microscope, annotate on the visual stream, and have the annotated stream appear in the binocular view for the operating mentee.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)680-686
Number of pages7
JournalWorld Neurosurgery
Volume99
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Craniotomy
Visual Fields
Students
Mentors
Aptitude
Neurosurgery
Anatomic Landmarks
Skull
Communication
Head
Surgeons

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Feasibility of Telementoring for Microneurosurgical Procedures Using a Microscope : A Proof-of-Concept Study. / Ladd, Bryan M.; Tackla, Ryan D.; Gupte, Akshay; Darrow, David; Sorenson, Jeffrey; Zuccarello, Mario; Grande, Andrew W.

In: World Neurosurgery, Vol. 99, 01.03.2017, p. 680-686.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ladd, Bryan M. ; Tackla, Ryan D. ; Gupte, Akshay ; Darrow, David ; Sorenson, Jeffrey ; Zuccarello, Mario ; Grande, Andrew W. / Feasibility of Telementoring for Microneurosurgical Procedures Using a Microscope : A Proof-of-Concept Study. In: World Neurosurgery. 2017 ; Vol. 99. pp. 680-686.
@article{863971c83c034bccb51404a6179481ba,
title = "Feasibility of Telementoring for Microneurosurgical Procedures Using a Microscope: A Proof-of-Concept Study",
abstract = "Background Our pilot study evaluated the effectiveness of our telementoring-telescripting model to facilitate seamless communication between surgeons while the operating surgeon is using a microscope. Methods As a first proof of concept, 4 students identified 20 anatomic landmarks on a dry human skull with or without telementoring guidance. To assess the ability to communicate operative information, a senior neurosurgery resident evaluated the student's ability and timing to complete a stepwise craniotomy on a cadaveric head, with and without telementoring guidance; a second portion included exposure of the anterior circulation. The mentor was able to annotate directly onto the operator's visual field, which was visible to the operator without looking away from the binocular view. Results The students showed that they were familiar with half (50{\%} ± 10{\%}) of the structures for identification and none was familiar with the steps to complete a craniotomy before using our system. With the guidance of a remote surgeon projected into the visual field of the microscope, the students were able to correctly identify 100{\%} of the structures and complete a craniotomy. Our system also proved effective in guiding a more experienced neurosurgery resident through complex operative steps associated with exposure of the anterior circulation. Conclusions Our pilot study showed a platform feasible in providing effective operative direction to inexperienced operators while operating using a microscope. A remote mentor was able to view the visual field of the microscope, annotate on the visual stream, and have the annotated stream appear in the binocular view for the operating mentee.",
author = "Ladd, {Bryan M.} and Tackla, {Ryan D.} and Akshay Gupte and David Darrow and Jeffrey Sorenson and Mario Zuccarello and Grande, {Andrew W.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.121",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
pages = "680--686",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of Telementoring for Microneurosurgical Procedures Using a Microscope

T2 - A Proof-of-Concept Study

AU - Ladd, Bryan M.

AU - Tackla, Ryan D.

AU - Gupte, Akshay

AU - Darrow, David

AU - Sorenson, Jeffrey

AU - Zuccarello, Mario

AU - Grande, Andrew W.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Background Our pilot study evaluated the effectiveness of our telementoring-telescripting model to facilitate seamless communication between surgeons while the operating surgeon is using a microscope. Methods As a first proof of concept, 4 students identified 20 anatomic landmarks on a dry human skull with or without telementoring guidance. To assess the ability to communicate operative information, a senior neurosurgery resident evaluated the student's ability and timing to complete a stepwise craniotomy on a cadaveric head, with and without telementoring guidance; a second portion included exposure of the anterior circulation. The mentor was able to annotate directly onto the operator's visual field, which was visible to the operator without looking away from the binocular view. Results The students showed that they were familiar with half (50% ± 10%) of the structures for identification and none was familiar with the steps to complete a craniotomy before using our system. With the guidance of a remote surgeon projected into the visual field of the microscope, the students were able to correctly identify 100% of the structures and complete a craniotomy. Our system also proved effective in guiding a more experienced neurosurgery resident through complex operative steps associated with exposure of the anterior circulation. Conclusions Our pilot study showed a platform feasible in providing effective operative direction to inexperienced operators while operating using a microscope. A remote mentor was able to view the visual field of the microscope, annotate on the visual stream, and have the annotated stream appear in the binocular view for the operating mentee.

AB - Background Our pilot study evaluated the effectiveness of our telementoring-telescripting model to facilitate seamless communication between surgeons while the operating surgeon is using a microscope. Methods As a first proof of concept, 4 students identified 20 anatomic landmarks on a dry human skull with or without telementoring guidance. To assess the ability to communicate operative information, a senior neurosurgery resident evaluated the student's ability and timing to complete a stepwise craniotomy on a cadaveric head, with and without telementoring guidance; a second portion included exposure of the anterior circulation. The mentor was able to annotate directly onto the operator's visual field, which was visible to the operator without looking away from the binocular view. Results The students showed that they were familiar with half (50% ± 10%) of the structures for identification and none was familiar with the steps to complete a craniotomy before using our system. With the guidance of a remote surgeon projected into the visual field of the microscope, the students were able to correctly identify 100% of the structures and complete a craniotomy. Our system also proved effective in guiding a more experienced neurosurgery resident through complex operative steps associated with exposure of the anterior circulation. Conclusions Our pilot study showed a platform feasible in providing effective operative direction to inexperienced operators while operating using a microscope. A remote mentor was able to view the visual field of the microscope, annotate on the visual stream, and have the annotated stream appear in the binocular view for the operating mentee.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009986873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009986873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.121

DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.121

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 680

EP - 686

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

ER -