Federally funded sterilization

Time to rethink policy?

Sonya Borrero, Nikki Zite, Mitchell D. Creinin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the 1970s, concern about coercive sterilization of low-income and minority women in the United States led the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare to create strict regulations for federally funded sterilization procedures. Although these policies were instituted to secure informed consent and protect women from involuntary sterilization, there are significant data indicating that these policies may not, in fact, ensure that consent is truly informed and, further, may prevent many low-income women fromgetting a desired sterilization procedure. Given the alarmingly high rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, especially among low-income populations, we feel that restrictive federal sterilization policies should be reexamined and modified to simultaneously ensure informed decisionmaking and honor women's reproductive choices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1822-1825
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume102
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012

Fingerprint

Involuntary Sterilization
Pregnancy Rate
Poverty
Informed Consent
Health Education

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Federally funded sterilization : Time to rethink policy? / Borrero, Sonya; Zite, Nikki; Creinin, Mitchell D.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 102, No. 10, 01.10.2012, p. 1822-1825.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Borrero, Sonya ; Zite, Nikki ; Creinin, Mitchell D. / Federally funded sterilization : Time to rethink policy?. In: American Journal of Public Health. 2012 ; Vol. 102, No. 10. pp. 1822-1825.
@article{bb43d2faa3c84fdea2afbfac31fb37f9,
title = "Federally funded sterilization: Time to rethink policy?",
abstract = "In the 1970s, concern about coercive sterilization of low-income and minority women in the United States led the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare to create strict regulations for federally funded sterilization procedures. Although these policies were instituted to secure informed consent and protect women from involuntary sterilization, there are significant data indicating that these policies may not, in fact, ensure that consent is truly informed and, further, may prevent many low-income women fromgetting a desired sterilization procedure. Given the alarmingly high rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, especially among low-income populations, we feel that restrictive federal sterilization policies should be reexamined and modified to simultaneously ensure informed decisionmaking and honor women's reproductive choices.",
author = "Sonya Borrero and Nikki Zite and Creinin, {Mitchell D.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2012.300850",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "1822--1825",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Federally funded sterilization

T2 - Time to rethink policy?

AU - Borrero, Sonya

AU - Zite, Nikki

AU - Creinin, Mitchell D.

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - In the 1970s, concern about coercive sterilization of low-income and minority women in the United States led the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare to create strict regulations for federally funded sterilization procedures. Although these policies were instituted to secure informed consent and protect women from involuntary sterilization, there are significant data indicating that these policies may not, in fact, ensure that consent is truly informed and, further, may prevent many low-income women fromgetting a desired sterilization procedure. Given the alarmingly high rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, especially among low-income populations, we feel that restrictive federal sterilization policies should be reexamined and modified to simultaneously ensure informed decisionmaking and honor women's reproductive choices.

AB - In the 1970s, concern about coercive sterilization of low-income and minority women in the United States led the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare to create strict regulations for federally funded sterilization procedures. Although these policies were instituted to secure informed consent and protect women from involuntary sterilization, there are significant data indicating that these policies may not, in fact, ensure that consent is truly informed and, further, may prevent many low-income women fromgetting a desired sterilization procedure. Given the alarmingly high rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, especially among low-income populations, we feel that restrictive federal sterilization policies should be reexamined and modified to simultaneously ensure informed decisionmaking and honor women's reproductive choices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866324538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866324538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300850

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300850

M3 - Review article

VL - 102

SP - 1822

EP - 1825

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 10

ER -