Gallbladder stent placement for prevention of cholecystitis in patients receiving covered metal stent for malignant obstructive jaundice

A feasibility study

Sonia Gosain, Hugo Bonatti, Lavone Smith, Michele E. Rehan, Andrew Brock, Anshu Mahajan, Melissa Lapinska, Henry C. Ho, Kristi Ellen, Vanessa M. Shami, Michel Kahaleh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Covered self-expanding metal stents (CSEMS) have been used for palliation of malignant distal biliary strictures. Occlusion of the cystic duct by CSEMS may be complicated by cholecystitis. This potentially could be prevented by placement of a transpapillary gallbladder stent (GBS). Patients and Methods: Between 11/2006 and 10/2007, a total of 73 patients (50 male) aged 65 ± 14 years underwent CSEMS placement for palliation of malignant obstructive jaundice. In cases where CSEMS placement caused occlusion of the cystic duct, a 7 French transpapillary pigtail gallbladder stent (GBS) was inserted to prevent cholecystitis. Results: Of the 73 patients, 18 had a prior cholecystectomy; 34 had the CSEMS placed below the cystic duct insertion. In 19 out of the 21 patients who had a CSEMS covering the cystic duct ostium, GBS placement was attempted, which was successful in 11 individuals (58%). An attempt to access the gallbladder was complicated by wire perforation of the cystic duct in three patients; one patient requiring emergent cholecystostomy tube placement. None of the patients who underwent successful GBS placement developed cholecystitis. One GBS dislodged and was repositioned. Cholecystitis occurred in two (20%) of the ten patients without transpapillary gallbladder decompression who had a CSEMS covering the cystic duct. Conclusions: The ideal placement of a CSEMS is below the cystic duct insertion. Should the cystic duct ostium be occluded, placement of a GBS should be considered to minimize the risk of cholecystitis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2406-2411
Number of pages6
JournalDigestive Diseases and Sciences
Volume55
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cholecystitis
Obstructive Jaundice
Feasibility Studies
Gallbladder
Stents
Metals
Cystic Duct
Cholecystostomy
Cholecystectomy
Decompression

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physiology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Gallbladder stent placement for prevention of cholecystitis in patients receiving covered metal stent for malignant obstructive jaundice : A feasibility study. / Gosain, Sonia; Bonatti, Hugo; Smith, Lavone; Rehan, Michele E.; Brock, Andrew; Mahajan, Anshu; Lapinska, Melissa; Ho, Henry C.; Ellen, Kristi; Shami, Vanessa M.; Kahaleh, Michel.

In: Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Vol. 55, No. 8, 01.08.2010, p. 2406-2411.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gosain, Sonia ; Bonatti, Hugo ; Smith, Lavone ; Rehan, Michele E. ; Brock, Andrew ; Mahajan, Anshu ; Lapinska, Melissa ; Ho, Henry C. ; Ellen, Kristi ; Shami, Vanessa M. ; Kahaleh, Michel. / Gallbladder stent placement for prevention of cholecystitis in patients receiving covered metal stent for malignant obstructive jaundice : A feasibility study. In: Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2010 ; Vol. 55, No. 8. pp. 2406-2411.
@article{f3fc539ed36d4be1ba966544accf992a,
title = "Gallbladder stent placement for prevention of cholecystitis in patients receiving covered metal stent for malignant obstructive jaundice: A feasibility study",
abstract = "Purpose: Covered self-expanding metal stents (CSEMS) have been used for palliation of malignant distal biliary strictures. Occlusion of the cystic duct by CSEMS may be complicated by cholecystitis. This potentially could be prevented by placement of a transpapillary gallbladder stent (GBS). Patients and Methods: Between 11/2006 and 10/2007, a total of 73 patients (50 male) aged 65 ± 14 years underwent CSEMS placement for palliation of malignant obstructive jaundice. In cases where CSEMS placement caused occlusion of the cystic duct, a 7 French transpapillary pigtail gallbladder stent (GBS) was inserted to prevent cholecystitis. Results: Of the 73 patients, 18 had a prior cholecystectomy; 34 had the CSEMS placed below the cystic duct insertion. In 19 out of the 21 patients who had a CSEMS covering the cystic duct ostium, GBS placement was attempted, which was successful in 11 individuals (58{\%}). An attempt to access the gallbladder was complicated by wire perforation of the cystic duct in three patients; one patient requiring emergent cholecystostomy tube placement. None of the patients who underwent successful GBS placement developed cholecystitis. One GBS dislodged and was repositioned. Cholecystitis occurred in two (20{\%}) of the ten patients without transpapillary gallbladder decompression who had a CSEMS covering the cystic duct. Conclusions: The ideal placement of a CSEMS is below the cystic duct insertion. Should the cystic duct ostium be occluded, placement of a GBS should be considered to minimize the risk of cholecystitis.",
author = "Sonia Gosain and Hugo Bonatti and Lavone Smith and Rehan, {Michele E.} and Andrew Brock and Anshu Mahajan and Melissa Lapinska and Ho, {Henry C.} and Kristi Ellen and Shami, {Vanessa M.} and Michel Kahaleh",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10620-009-1024-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "2406--2411",
journal = "Digestive Diseases and Sciences",
issn = "0163-2116",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gallbladder stent placement for prevention of cholecystitis in patients receiving covered metal stent for malignant obstructive jaundice

T2 - A feasibility study

AU - Gosain, Sonia

AU - Bonatti, Hugo

AU - Smith, Lavone

AU - Rehan, Michele E.

AU - Brock, Andrew

AU - Mahajan, Anshu

AU - Lapinska, Melissa

AU - Ho, Henry C.

AU - Ellen, Kristi

AU - Shami, Vanessa M.

AU - Kahaleh, Michel

PY - 2010/8/1

Y1 - 2010/8/1

N2 - Purpose: Covered self-expanding metal stents (CSEMS) have been used for palliation of malignant distal biliary strictures. Occlusion of the cystic duct by CSEMS may be complicated by cholecystitis. This potentially could be prevented by placement of a transpapillary gallbladder stent (GBS). Patients and Methods: Between 11/2006 and 10/2007, a total of 73 patients (50 male) aged 65 ± 14 years underwent CSEMS placement for palliation of malignant obstructive jaundice. In cases where CSEMS placement caused occlusion of the cystic duct, a 7 French transpapillary pigtail gallbladder stent (GBS) was inserted to prevent cholecystitis. Results: Of the 73 patients, 18 had a prior cholecystectomy; 34 had the CSEMS placed below the cystic duct insertion. In 19 out of the 21 patients who had a CSEMS covering the cystic duct ostium, GBS placement was attempted, which was successful in 11 individuals (58%). An attempt to access the gallbladder was complicated by wire perforation of the cystic duct in three patients; one patient requiring emergent cholecystostomy tube placement. None of the patients who underwent successful GBS placement developed cholecystitis. One GBS dislodged and was repositioned. Cholecystitis occurred in two (20%) of the ten patients without transpapillary gallbladder decompression who had a CSEMS covering the cystic duct. Conclusions: The ideal placement of a CSEMS is below the cystic duct insertion. Should the cystic duct ostium be occluded, placement of a GBS should be considered to minimize the risk of cholecystitis.

AB - Purpose: Covered self-expanding metal stents (CSEMS) have been used for palliation of malignant distal biliary strictures. Occlusion of the cystic duct by CSEMS may be complicated by cholecystitis. This potentially could be prevented by placement of a transpapillary gallbladder stent (GBS). Patients and Methods: Between 11/2006 and 10/2007, a total of 73 patients (50 male) aged 65 ± 14 years underwent CSEMS placement for palliation of malignant obstructive jaundice. In cases where CSEMS placement caused occlusion of the cystic duct, a 7 French transpapillary pigtail gallbladder stent (GBS) was inserted to prevent cholecystitis. Results: Of the 73 patients, 18 had a prior cholecystectomy; 34 had the CSEMS placed below the cystic duct insertion. In 19 out of the 21 patients who had a CSEMS covering the cystic duct ostium, GBS placement was attempted, which was successful in 11 individuals (58%). An attempt to access the gallbladder was complicated by wire perforation of the cystic duct in three patients; one patient requiring emergent cholecystostomy tube placement. None of the patients who underwent successful GBS placement developed cholecystitis. One GBS dislodged and was repositioned. Cholecystitis occurred in two (20%) of the ten patients without transpapillary gallbladder decompression who had a CSEMS covering the cystic duct. Conclusions: The ideal placement of a CSEMS is below the cystic duct insertion. Should the cystic duct ostium be occluded, placement of a GBS should be considered to minimize the risk of cholecystitis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954424207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954424207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10620-009-1024-9

DO - 10.1007/s10620-009-1024-9

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 2406

EP - 2411

JO - Digestive Diseases and Sciences

JF - Digestive Diseases and Sciences

SN - 0163-2116

IS - 8

ER -