Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists

Charlotte F. Kweldam, Daan Nieboer, Ferran Algaba, Mahul Amin, Dan M. Berney, Athanase Billis, David G. Bostwick, Lukas Bubendorf, Liang Cheng, Eva Compérat, Brett Delahunt, Lars Egevad, Andrew J. Evans, Donna E. Hansel, Peter A. Humphrey, Glen Kristiansen, Theodorus H. van der Kwast, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Rodolfo Montironi, George J. NettoHemamali Samaratunga, John R. Srigley, Puay H. Tan, Murali Varma, Ming Zhou, Geert J.L.H. van Leenders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: To assess the interobserver reproducibility of individual Gleason grade 4 growth patterns. Methods and results: Twenty-three genitourinary pathologists participated in the evaluation of 60 selected high-magnification photographs. The selection included 10 cases of Gleason grade 3, 40 of Gleason grade 4 (10 per growth pattern), and 10 of Gleason grade 5. Participants were asked to select a single predominant Gleason grade per case (3, 4, or 5), and to indicate the predominant Gleason grade 4 growth pattern, if present. ‘Consensus’ was defined as at least 80% agreement, and ‘favoured’ as 60–80% agreement. Consensus on Gleason grading was reached in 47 of 60 (78%) cases, 35 of which were assigned to grade 4. In the 13 non-consensus cases, ill-formed (6/13, 46%) and fused (7/13, 54%) patterns were involved in the disagreement. Among the 20 cases where at least one pathologist assigned the ill-formed growth pattern, none (0%, 0/20) reached consensus. Consensus for fused, cribriform and glomeruloid glands was reached in 2%, 23% and 38% of cases, respectively. In nine of 35 (26%) consensus Gleason grade 4 cases, participants disagreed on the growth pattern. Six of these were characterized by large epithelial proliferations with delicate intervening fibrovascular cores, which were alternatively given the designation fused or cribriform growth pattern (‘complex fused’). Conclusions: Consensus on Gleason grade 4 growth pattern was predominantly reached on cribriform and glomeruloid patterns, but rarely on ill-formed and fused glands. The complex fused glands seem to constitute a borderline pattern of unknown prognostic significance on which a consensus could not be reached.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)441-449
Number of pages9
JournalHistopathology
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Prostate
Adenocarcinoma
Growth
Neoplasm Grading
Pathologists

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Histology

Cite this

Kweldam, C. F., Nieboer, D., Algaba, F., Amin, M., Berney, D. M., Billis, A., ... van Leenders, G. J. L. H. (2016). Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists. Histopathology, 69(3), 441-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12976

Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns : an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists. / Kweldam, Charlotte F.; Nieboer, Daan; Algaba, Ferran; Amin, Mahul; Berney, Dan M.; Billis, Athanase; Bostwick, David G.; Bubendorf, Lukas; Cheng, Liang; Compérat, Eva; Delahunt, Brett; Egevad, Lars; Evans, Andrew J.; Hansel, Donna E.; Humphrey, Peter A.; Kristiansen, Glen; van der Kwast, Theodorus H.; Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina; Montironi, Rodolfo; Netto, George J.; Samaratunga, Hemamali; Srigley, John R.; Tan, Puay H.; Varma, Murali; Zhou, Ming; van Leenders, Geert J.L.H.

In: Histopathology, Vol. 69, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 441-449.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kweldam, CF, Nieboer, D, Algaba, F, Amin, M, Berney, DM, Billis, A, Bostwick, DG, Bubendorf, L, Cheng, L, Compérat, E, Delahunt, B, Egevad, L, Evans, AJ, Hansel, DE, Humphrey, PA, Kristiansen, G, van der Kwast, TH, Magi-Galluzzi, C, Montironi, R, Netto, GJ, Samaratunga, H, Srigley, JR, Tan, PH, Varma, M, Zhou, M & van Leenders, GJLH 2016, 'Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists', Histopathology, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 441-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12976
Kweldam, Charlotte F. ; Nieboer, Daan ; Algaba, Ferran ; Amin, Mahul ; Berney, Dan M. ; Billis, Athanase ; Bostwick, David G. ; Bubendorf, Lukas ; Cheng, Liang ; Compérat, Eva ; Delahunt, Brett ; Egevad, Lars ; Evans, Andrew J. ; Hansel, Donna E. ; Humphrey, Peter A. ; Kristiansen, Glen ; van der Kwast, Theodorus H. ; Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina ; Montironi, Rodolfo ; Netto, George J. ; Samaratunga, Hemamali ; Srigley, John R. ; Tan, Puay H. ; Varma, Murali ; Zhou, Ming ; van Leenders, Geert J.L.H. / Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns : an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists. In: Histopathology. 2016 ; Vol. 69, No. 3. pp. 441-449.
@article{1e9f09cf9f51441c9e1fe1b485851bbf,
title = "Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists",
abstract = "Aims: To assess the interobserver reproducibility of individual Gleason grade 4 growth patterns. Methods and results: Twenty-three genitourinary pathologists participated in the evaluation of 60 selected high-magnification photographs. The selection included 10 cases of Gleason grade 3, 40 of Gleason grade 4 (10 per growth pattern), and 10 of Gleason grade 5. Participants were asked to select a single predominant Gleason grade per case (3, 4, or 5), and to indicate the predominant Gleason grade 4 growth pattern, if present. ‘Consensus’ was defined as at least 80{\%} agreement, and ‘favoured’ as 60–80{\%} agreement. Consensus on Gleason grading was reached in 47 of 60 (78{\%}) cases, 35 of which were assigned to grade 4. In the 13 non-consensus cases, ill-formed (6/13, 46{\%}) and fused (7/13, 54{\%}) patterns were involved in the disagreement. Among the 20 cases where at least one pathologist assigned the ill-formed growth pattern, none (0{\%}, 0/20) reached consensus. Consensus for fused, cribriform and glomeruloid glands was reached in 2{\%}, 23{\%} and 38{\%} of cases, respectively. In nine of 35 (26{\%}) consensus Gleason grade 4 cases, participants disagreed on the growth pattern. Six of these were characterized by large epithelial proliferations with delicate intervening fibrovascular cores, which were alternatively given the designation fused or cribriform growth pattern (‘complex fused’). Conclusions: Consensus on Gleason grade 4 growth pattern was predominantly reached on cribriform and glomeruloid patterns, but rarely on ill-formed and fused glands. The complex fused glands seem to constitute a borderline pattern of unknown prognostic significance on which a consensus could not be reached.",
author = "Kweldam, {Charlotte F.} and Daan Nieboer and Ferran Algaba and Mahul Amin and Berney, {Dan M.} and Athanase Billis and Bostwick, {David G.} and Lukas Bubendorf and Liang Cheng and Eva Comp{\'e}rat and Brett Delahunt and Lars Egevad and Evans, {Andrew J.} and Hansel, {Donna E.} and Humphrey, {Peter A.} and Glen Kristiansen and {van der Kwast}, {Theodorus H.} and Cristina Magi-Galluzzi and Rodolfo Montironi and Netto, {George J.} and Hemamali Samaratunga and Srigley, {John R.} and Tan, {Puay H.} and Murali Varma and Ming Zhou and {van Leenders}, {Geert J.L.H.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/his.12976",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "441--449",
journal = "Histopathology",
issn = "0309-0167",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns

T2 - an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists

AU - Kweldam, Charlotte F.

AU - Nieboer, Daan

AU - Algaba, Ferran

AU - Amin, Mahul

AU - Berney, Dan M.

AU - Billis, Athanase

AU - Bostwick, David G.

AU - Bubendorf, Lukas

AU - Cheng, Liang

AU - Compérat, Eva

AU - Delahunt, Brett

AU - Egevad, Lars

AU - Evans, Andrew J.

AU - Hansel, Donna E.

AU - Humphrey, Peter A.

AU - Kristiansen, Glen

AU - van der Kwast, Theodorus H.

AU - Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina

AU - Montironi, Rodolfo

AU - Netto, George J.

AU - Samaratunga, Hemamali

AU - Srigley, John R.

AU - Tan, Puay H.

AU - Varma, Murali

AU - Zhou, Ming

AU - van Leenders, Geert J.L.H.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Aims: To assess the interobserver reproducibility of individual Gleason grade 4 growth patterns. Methods and results: Twenty-three genitourinary pathologists participated in the evaluation of 60 selected high-magnification photographs. The selection included 10 cases of Gleason grade 3, 40 of Gleason grade 4 (10 per growth pattern), and 10 of Gleason grade 5. Participants were asked to select a single predominant Gleason grade per case (3, 4, or 5), and to indicate the predominant Gleason grade 4 growth pattern, if present. ‘Consensus’ was defined as at least 80% agreement, and ‘favoured’ as 60–80% agreement. Consensus on Gleason grading was reached in 47 of 60 (78%) cases, 35 of which were assigned to grade 4. In the 13 non-consensus cases, ill-formed (6/13, 46%) and fused (7/13, 54%) patterns were involved in the disagreement. Among the 20 cases where at least one pathologist assigned the ill-formed growth pattern, none (0%, 0/20) reached consensus. Consensus for fused, cribriform and glomeruloid glands was reached in 2%, 23% and 38% of cases, respectively. In nine of 35 (26%) consensus Gleason grade 4 cases, participants disagreed on the growth pattern. Six of these were characterized by large epithelial proliferations with delicate intervening fibrovascular cores, which were alternatively given the designation fused or cribriform growth pattern (‘complex fused’). Conclusions: Consensus on Gleason grade 4 growth pattern was predominantly reached on cribriform and glomeruloid patterns, but rarely on ill-formed and fused glands. The complex fused glands seem to constitute a borderline pattern of unknown prognostic significance on which a consensus could not be reached.

AB - Aims: To assess the interobserver reproducibility of individual Gleason grade 4 growth patterns. Methods and results: Twenty-three genitourinary pathologists participated in the evaluation of 60 selected high-magnification photographs. The selection included 10 cases of Gleason grade 3, 40 of Gleason grade 4 (10 per growth pattern), and 10 of Gleason grade 5. Participants were asked to select a single predominant Gleason grade per case (3, 4, or 5), and to indicate the predominant Gleason grade 4 growth pattern, if present. ‘Consensus’ was defined as at least 80% agreement, and ‘favoured’ as 60–80% agreement. Consensus on Gleason grading was reached in 47 of 60 (78%) cases, 35 of which were assigned to grade 4. In the 13 non-consensus cases, ill-formed (6/13, 46%) and fused (7/13, 54%) patterns were involved in the disagreement. Among the 20 cases where at least one pathologist assigned the ill-formed growth pattern, none (0%, 0/20) reached consensus. Consensus for fused, cribriform and glomeruloid glands was reached in 2%, 23% and 38% of cases, respectively. In nine of 35 (26%) consensus Gleason grade 4 cases, participants disagreed on the growth pattern. Six of these were characterized by large epithelial proliferations with delicate intervening fibrovascular cores, which were alternatively given the designation fused or cribriform growth pattern (‘complex fused’). Conclusions: Consensus on Gleason grade 4 growth pattern was predominantly reached on cribriform and glomeruloid patterns, but rarely on ill-formed and fused glands. The complex fused glands seem to constitute a borderline pattern of unknown prognostic significance on which a consensus could not be reached.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981499561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981499561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/his.12976

DO - 10.1111/his.12976

M3 - Article

C2 - 27028587

AN - SCOPUS:84981499561

VL - 69

SP - 441

EP - 449

JO - Histopathology

JF - Histopathology

SN - 0309-0167

IS - 3

ER -