How accurately, reproducibly, and efficiently can we measure left ventricular indices using M-mode, 2-dimensional, and 3-dimensional echocardiography in children?

Xiuzhang Lu, Mingxing Xie, David Tomberlin, Berthold Klas, Vyacheslav Nadvoretskiy, Nancy Ayres, Jeffrey Towbin, Shuping Ge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Measurements of left ventricular (LV) size, mass, and function are the most common and important tasks for echocardiography in clinical practice and research in children with congenital and acquired heart diseases. There are little data to compare the utility of M-mode (MM), 2-dimensional (2D), and 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic techniques for quantification of LV indices. The objective of the study was to assess the accuracy, reproducibility, and efficiency of these echocardiographic methods for measurement of LV indices in children. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in 20 consecutive children (mean 10.6 ± 2.8 years, 11 male and 9 female subjects) using conventional MM, 2D, and real-time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE). A Sonos 7500 system (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA) was used. M-mode and 2DE measurements were made according to the American Society of echocardiography recommendations. To include the entire LV for volumetric measurement, full-volume 3D data sets were acquired from 4 electrocardiogram gated subvolumes. The 3DE measurements were made off-line manually using 4-plane and 8-plane algorithms by 4D Echo-View (TomTec Imaging Systems, Munich, Germany) and a semiautomated algorithm by QLAB (Philips Medical Systems). Magnetic resonance imaging studies were also performed to determine the LV indices by a disk summation method based on the Simpson principle. Results: The correlation and agreement between MM, 2D, and RT3D echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging measurements are good (r = 0.81-0.97) for the 3 methods. The correlation was superior for RT3DE compared with 2DE and MM. The correlation and agreement were similar for the three 3DE methods. The intra- and interobserver variabilities ranged from MM (4.3%-4.8% and 7.0%-8.7%), 2DE (3.3%-4.5% and 5.5%-7.3%), and 3DE (0.4%-2.3%, and 0.2%-4.8%). The total time (acquisition and analysis) used for MM measurements was the least compared with 2DE and 3DE. The total time for 3DE using the semiautomated algorithms was not significantly different compared with that for 2DE. Conclusions: Our study showed that MM provides the most efficient assessment of LV indices but is the least accurate and reproducible technique compared with 2DE and 3DE. Three-dimensional echocardiography using both automated and manual analysis algorithm is superior to MM and 2DE for measurements of LV indices, and the automated 3DE algorithm is as efficient as 2DE. Therefore, 3DE using the automated algorithm is the method of choice for quantification of LV indices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)946-953
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume155
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Echocardiography
Three-Dimensional Echocardiography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Observer Variation
Germany
Heart Diseases
Electrocardiography
Prospective Studies
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

How accurately, reproducibly, and efficiently can we measure left ventricular indices using M-mode, 2-dimensional, and 3-dimensional echocardiography in children? / Lu, Xiuzhang; Xie, Mingxing; Tomberlin, David; Klas, Berthold; Nadvoretskiy, Vyacheslav; Ayres, Nancy; Towbin, Jeffrey; Ge, Shuping.

In: American Heart Journal, Vol. 155, No. 5, 01.05.2008, p. 946-953.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lu, Xiuzhang ; Xie, Mingxing ; Tomberlin, David ; Klas, Berthold ; Nadvoretskiy, Vyacheslav ; Ayres, Nancy ; Towbin, Jeffrey ; Ge, Shuping. / How accurately, reproducibly, and efficiently can we measure left ventricular indices using M-mode, 2-dimensional, and 3-dimensional echocardiography in children?. In: American Heart Journal. 2008 ; Vol. 155, No. 5. pp. 946-953.
@article{2804f4e8675f4f13af641c45a0edf33e,
title = "How accurately, reproducibly, and efficiently can we measure left ventricular indices using M-mode, 2-dimensional, and 3-dimensional echocardiography in children?",
abstract = "Measurements of left ventricular (LV) size, mass, and function are the most common and important tasks for echocardiography in clinical practice and research in children with congenital and acquired heart diseases. There are little data to compare the utility of M-mode (MM), 2-dimensional (2D), and 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic techniques for quantification of LV indices. The objective of the study was to assess the accuracy, reproducibility, and efficiency of these echocardiographic methods for measurement of LV indices in children. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in 20 consecutive children (mean 10.6 ± 2.8 years, 11 male and 9 female subjects) using conventional MM, 2D, and real-time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE). A Sonos 7500 system (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA) was used. M-mode and 2DE measurements were made according to the American Society of echocardiography recommendations. To include the entire LV for volumetric measurement, full-volume 3D data sets were acquired from 4 electrocardiogram gated subvolumes. The 3DE measurements were made off-line manually using 4-plane and 8-plane algorithms by 4D Echo-View (TomTec Imaging Systems, Munich, Germany) and a semiautomated algorithm by QLAB (Philips Medical Systems). Magnetic resonance imaging studies were also performed to determine the LV indices by a disk summation method based on the Simpson principle. Results: The correlation and agreement between MM, 2D, and RT3D echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging measurements are good (r = 0.81-0.97) for the 3 methods. The correlation was superior for RT3DE compared with 2DE and MM. The correlation and agreement were similar for the three 3DE methods. The intra- and interobserver variabilities ranged from MM (4.3{\%}-4.8{\%} and 7.0{\%}-8.7{\%}), 2DE (3.3{\%}-4.5{\%} and 5.5{\%}-7.3{\%}), and 3DE (0.4{\%}-2.3{\%}, and 0.2{\%}-4.8{\%}). The total time (acquisition and analysis) used for MM measurements was the least compared with 2DE and 3DE. The total time for 3DE using the semiautomated algorithms was not significantly different compared with that for 2DE. Conclusions: Our study showed that MM provides the most efficient assessment of LV indices but is the least accurate and reproducible technique compared with 2DE and 3DE. Three-dimensional echocardiography using both automated and manual analysis algorithm is superior to MM and 2DE for measurements of LV indices, and the automated 3DE algorithm is as efficient as 2DE. Therefore, 3DE using the automated algorithm is the method of choice for quantification of LV indices.",
author = "Xiuzhang Lu and Mingxing Xie and David Tomberlin and Berthold Klas and Vyacheslav Nadvoretskiy and Nancy Ayres and Jeffrey Towbin and Shuping Ge",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "155",
pages = "946--953",
journal = "American Heart Journal",
issn = "0002-8703",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How accurately, reproducibly, and efficiently can we measure left ventricular indices using M-mode, 2-dimensional, and 3-dimensional echocardiography in children?

AU - Lu, Xiuzhang

AU - Xie, Mingxing

AU - Tomberlin, David

AU - Klas, Berthold

AU - Nadvoretskiy, Vyacheslav

AU - Ayres, Nancy

AU - Towbin, Jeffrey

AU - Ge, Shuping

PY - 2008/5/1

Y1 - 2008/5/1

N2 - Measurements of left ventricular (LV) size, mass, and function are the most common and important tasks for echocardiography in clinical practice and research in children with congenital and acquired heart diseases. There are little data to compare the utility of M-mode (MM), 2-dimensional (2D), and 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic techniques for quantification of LV indices. The objective of the study was to assess the accuracy, reproducibility, and efficiency of these echocardiographic methods for measurement of LV indices in children. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in 20 consecutive children (mean 10.6 ± 2.8 years, 11 male and 9 female subjects) using conventional MM, 2D, and real-time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE). A Sonos 7500 system (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA) was used. M-mode and 2DE measurements were made according to the American Society of echocardiography recommendations. To include the entire LV for volumetric measurement, full-volume 3D data sets were acquired from 4 electrocardiogram gated subvolumes. The 3DE measurements were made off-line manually using 4-plane and 8-plane algorithms by 4D Echo-View (TomTec Imaging Systems, Munich, Germany) and a semiautomated algorithm by QLAB (Philips Medical Systems). Magnetic resonance imaging studies were also performed to determine the LV indices by a disk summation method based on the Simpson principle. Results: The correlation and agreement between MM, 2D, and RT3D echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging measurements are good (r = 0.81-0.97) for the 3 methods. The correlation was superior for RT3DE compared with 2DE and MM. The correlation and agreement were similar for the three 3DE methods. The intra- and interobserver variabilities ranged from MM (4.3%-4.8% and 7.0%-8.7%), 2DE (3.3%-4.5% and 5.5%-7.3%), and 3DE (0.4%-2.3%, and 0.2%-4.8%). The total time (acquisition and analysis) used for MM measurements was the least compared with 2DE and 3DE. The total time for 3DE using the semiautomated algorithms was not significantly different compared with that for 2DE. Conclusions: Our study showed that MM provides the most efficient assessment of LV indices but is the least accurate and reproducible technique compared with 2DE and 3DE. Three-dimensional echocardiography using both automated and manual analysis algorithm is superior to MM and 2DE for measurements of LV indices, and the automated 3DE algorithm is as efficient as 2DE. Therefore, 3DE using the automated algorithm is the method of choice for quantification of LV indices.

AB - Measurements of left ventricular (LV) size, mass, and function are the most common and important tasks for echocardiography in clinical practice and research in children with congenital and acquired heart diseases. There are little data to compare the utility of M-mode (MM), 2-dimensional (2D), and 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic techniques for quantification of LV indices. The objective of the study was to assess the accuracy, reproducibility, and efficiency of these echocardiographic methods for measurement of LV indices in children. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in 20 consecutive children (mean 10.6 ± 2.8 years, 11 male and 9 female subjects) using conventional MM, 2D, and real-time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE). A Sonos 7500 system (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA) was used. M-mode and 2DE measurements were made according to the American Society of echocardiography recommendations. To include the entire LV for volumetric measurement, full-volume 3D data sets were acquired from 4 electrocardiogram gated subvolumes. The 3DE measurements were made off-line manually using 4-plane and 8-plane algorithms by 4D Echo-View (TomTec Imaging Systems, Munich, Germany) and a semiautomated algorithm by QLAB (Philips Medical Systems). Magnetic resonance imaging studies were also performed to determine the LV indices by a disk summation method based on the Simpson principle. Results: The correlation and agreement between MM, 2D, and RT3D echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging measurements are good (r = 0.81-0.97) for the 3 methods. The correlation was superior for RT3DE compared with 2DE and MM. The correlation and agreement were similar for the three 3DE methods. The intra- and interobserver variabilities ranged from MM (4.3%-4.8% and 7.0%-8.7%), 2DE (3.3%-4.5% and 5.5%-7.3%), and 3DE (0.4%-2.3%, and 0.2%-4.8%). The total time (acquisition and analysis) used for MM measurements was the least compared with 2DE and 3DE. The total time for 3DE using the semiautomated algorithms was not significantly different compared with that for 2DE. Conclusions: Our study showed that MM provides the most efficient assessment of LV indices but is the least accurate and reproducible technique compared with 2DE and 3DE. Three-dimensional echocardiography using both automated and manual analysis algorithm is superior to MM and 2DE for measurements of LV indices, and the automated 3DE algorithm is as efficient as 2DE. Therefore, 3DE using the automated algorithm is the method of choice for quantification of LV indices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42649093771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42649093771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.034

DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.034

M3 - Article

VL - 155

SP - 946

EP - 953

JO - American Heart Journal

JF - American Heart Journal

SN - 0002-8703

IS - 5

ER -