How useful is the information provided by the National Practitioner Data Bank?

Teresa Waters, Jennifer Parsons, Richard Warnecke, Orit Almagor, Peter P. Budetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) serves as a federal information clearinghouse on malpractice payments for and disciplinary sanctions against health care practitioners. Hospitals are required to query the NPDB biannually for practitioners with clinical privileges, and other health care entities with significant peer review are encouraged to query the NPDB. A study was conducted to determine whether health care organizations find the NPDB useful. METHODS: A survey was conducted of 1,038 organizations that queried the NPDB between March 1998 and February 1999; 653 of those respondents also answered questions regarding 1,639 specific matched responses (feedback from the NPDB when the practitioner in question had one or more reports). RESULTS: Overall, the entities rated querying the NPDB as very useful (6.16 on a 7-point scale). More than 21% of matched responses contained new information, and this information altered institutional credentialing decisions in more than 5% of the cases. DISCUSSION: Many of the results from this study are consistent with findings in Office of Inspector General reports. The fact that 5% of credentialing decisions were altered because of NPDB information suggests that practitioner self-report is an inadequate mechanism for soliciting credentialing information. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: NPDB reports provide accurate and complete information that is useful to providers in their credentialing process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)416-424
Number of pages9
JournalJoint Commission journal on quality and safety
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

National Practitioner Data Bank
Credentialing
Delivery of Health Care
Organizations
Peer Review
Malpractice
Self Report

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

How useful is the information provided by the National Practitioner Data Bank? / Waters, Teresa; Parsons, Jennifer; Warnecke, Richard; Almagor, Orit; Budetti, Peter P.

In: Joint Commission journal on quality and safety, Vol. 29, No. 8, 01.01.2003, p. 416-424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Waters, Teresa ; Parsons, Jennifer ; Warnecke, Richard ; Almagor, Orit ; Budetti, Peter P. / How useful is the information provided by the National Practitioner Data Bank?. In: Joint Commission journal on quality and safety. 2003 ; Vol. 29, No. 8. pp. 416-424.
@article{b6b6fe192e234e25803bc0bb55576dfc,
title = "How useful is the information provided by the National Practitioner Data Bank?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) serves as a federal information clearinghouse on malpractice payments for and disciplinary sanctions against health care practitioners. Hospitals are required to query the NPDB biannually for practitioners with clinical privileges, and other health care entities with significant peer review are encouraged to query the NPDB. A study was conducted to determine whether health care organizations find the NPDB useful. METHODS: A survey was conducted of 1,038 organizations that queried the NPDB between March 1998 and February 1999; 653 of those respondents also answered questions regarding 1,639 specific matched responses (feedback from the NPDB when the practitioner in question had one or more reports). RESULTS: Overall, the entities rated querying the NPDB as very useful (6.16 on a 7-point scale). More than 21{\%} of matched responses contained new information, and this information altered institutional credentialing decisions in more than 5{\%} of the cases. DISCUSSION: Many of the results from this study are consistent with findings in Office of Inspector General reports. The fact that 5{\%} of credentialing decisions were altered because of NPDB information suggests that practitioner self-report is an inadequate mechanism for soliciting credentialing information. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: NPDB reports provide accurate and complete information that is useful to providers in their credentialing process.",
author = "Teresa Waters and Jennifer Parsons and Richard Warnecke and Orit Almagor and Budetti, {Peter P.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1549-3741(03)29050-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "416--424",
journal = "Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety",
issn = "1553-7250",
publisher = "Joint Commission Resources, Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How useful is the information provided by the National Practitioner Data Bank?

AU - Waters, Teresa

AU - Parsons, Jennifer

AU - Warnecke, Richard

AU - Almagor, Orit

AU - Budetti, Peter P.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) serves as a federal information clearinghouse on malpractice payments for and disciplinary sanctions against health care practitioners. Hospitals are required to query the NPDB biannually for practitioners with clinical privileges, and other health care entities with significant peer review are encouraged to query the NPDB. A study was conducted to determine whether health care organizations find the NPDB useful. METHODS: A survey was conducted of 1,038 organizations that queried the NPDB between March 1998 and February 1999; 653 of those respondents also answered questions regarding 1,639 specific matched responses (feedback from the NPDB when the practitioner in question had one or more reports). RESULTS: Overall, the entities rated querying the NPDB as very useful (6.16 on a 7-point scale). More than 21% of matched responses contained new information, and this information altered institutional credentialing decisions in more than 5% of the cases. DISCUSSION: Many of the results from this study are consistent with findings in Office of Inspector General reports. The fact that 5% of credentialing decisions were altered because of NPDB information suggests that practitioner self-report is an inadequate mechanism for soliciting credentialing information. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: NPDB reports provide accurate and complete information that is useful to providers in their credentialing process.

AB - BACKGROUND: The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) serves as a federal information clearinghouse on malpractice payments for and disciplinary sanctions against health care practitioners. Hospitals are required to query the NPDB biannually for practitioners with clinical privileges, and other health care entities with significant peer review are encouraged to query the NPDB. A study was conducted to determine whether health care organizations find the NPDB useful. METHODS: A survey was conducted of 1,038 organizations that queried the NPDB between March 1998 and February 1999; 653 of those respondents also answered questions regarding 1,639 specific matched responses (feedback from the NPDB when the practitioner in question had one or more reports). RESULTS: Overall, the entities rated querying the NPDB as very useful (6.16 on a 7-point scale). More than 21% of matched responses contained new information, and this information altered institutional credentialing decisions in more than 5% of the cases. DISCUSSION: Many of the results from this study are consistent with findings in Office of Inspector General reports. The fact that 5% of credentialing decisions were altered because of NPDB information suggests that practitioner self-report is an inadequate mechanism for soliciting credentialing information. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: NPDB reports provide accurate and complete information that is useful to providers in their credentialing process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142228237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142228237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1549-3741(03)29050-X

DO - 10.1016/S1549-3741(03)29050-X

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 416

EP - 424

JO - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

JF - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

SN - 1553-7250

IS - 8

ER -