Impact of an inexpensive anatomy-based fetal pig simulator on obstetric ultrasound training

Ugochi N. Akoma, Kristina Shumard, Linda Street, Brian C. Brost, Joshua F. Nitsche

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives - The purpose of this study was to construct an inexpensive anatomy-based obstetric ultrasound task trainer and investigate whether introduction of this trainer into a hands-on obstetric ultrasound course improved course participants' ultrasound scanning skills. Methods - The trainer was created by placing fetal pigs into preservative-filled heat-sealed polyethylene bags. Twenty-four participants in an obstetric ultrasound course at Wake Forest School of Medicine were randomized to receive hands-on scanning with pregnant women or hands-on scanning and fetal pig simulation. Biometric scans were performed before and after the course. The time to complete the scans, margin of error of biometric measurements, and number of technically adequate images per scan were compared between groups. Results - Twelve participants were randomized into each group. Although a direct comparison of postcourse biometric scans demonstrated no difference between groups, participants that received simulation training showed significant improvements in the time to complete the biometric scan (P <.05) and number of technically adequate images obtained (P <.05), whereas those who did not receive simulation training did not show significant improvements. Conclusions - Addition of the fetal pig ultrasound task trainer resulted in improvements in the course participants' scanning efficiency even after very limited exposure. Incorporating the task trainer earlier and more broadly into obstetric ultrasound training may benefit trainees.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1793-1799
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume34
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Obstetrics
Anatomy
Swine
Polyethylene
Pregnant Women
Hot Temperature
Medicine
Simulation Training

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Impact of an inexpensive anatomy-based fetal pig simulator on obstetric ultrasound training. / Akoma, Ugochi N.; Shumard, Kristina; Street, Linda; Brost, Brian C.; Nitsche, Joshua F.

In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol. 34, No. 10, 01.01.2015, p. 1793-1799.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Akoma, Ugochi N. ; Shumard, Kristina ; Street, Linda ; Brost, Brian C. ; Nitsche, Joshua F. / Impact of an inexpensive anatomy-based fetal pig simulator on obstetric ultrasound training. In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 34, No. 10. pp. 1793-1799.
@article{bce5a8f8b5a347979dbcdb61f7ec0399,
title = "Impact of an inexpensive anatomy-based fetal pig simulator on obstetric ultrasound training",
abstract = "Objectives - The purpose of this study was to construct an inexpensive anatomy-based obstetric ultrasound task trainer and investigate whether introduction of this trainer into a hands-on obstetric ultrasound course improved course participants' ultrasound scanning skills. Methods - The trainer was created by placing fetal pigs into preservative-filled heat-sealed polyethylene bags. Twenty-four participants in an obstetric ultrasound course at Wake Forest School of Medicine were randomized to receive hands-on scanning with pregnant women or hands-on scanning and fetal pig simulation. Biometric scans were performed before and after the course. The time to complete the scans, margin of error of biometric measurements, and number of technically adequate images per scan were compared between groups. Results - Twelve participants were randomized into each group. Although a direct comparison of postcourse biometric scans demonstrated no difference between groups, participants that received simulation training showed significant improvements in the time to complete the biometric scan (P <.05) and number of technically adequate images obtained (P <.05), whereas those who did not receive simulation training did not show significant improvements. Conclusions - Addition of the fetal pig ultrasound task trainer resulted in improvements in the course participants' scanning efficiency even after very limited exposure. Incorporating the task trainer earlier and more broadly into obstetric ultrasound training may benefit trainees.",
author = "Akoma, {Ugochi N.} and Kristina Shumard and Linda Street and Brost, {Brian C.} and Nitsche, {Joshua F.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7863/ultra.15.14.12004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "1793--1799",
journal = "Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine",
issn = "0278-4297",
publisher = "American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of an inexpensive anatomy-based fetal pig simulator on obstetric ultrasound training

AU - Akoma, Ugochi N.

AU - Shumard, Kristina

AU - Street, Linda

AU - Brost, Brian C.

AU - Nitsche, Joshua F.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Objectives - The purpose of this study was to construct an inexpensive anatomy-based obstetric ultrasound task trainer and investigate whether introduction of this trainer into a hands-on obstetric ultrasound course improved course participants' ultrasound scanning skills. Methods - The trainer was created by placing fetal pigs into preservative-filled heat-sealed polyethylene bags. Twenty-four participants in an obstetric ultrasound course at Wake Forest School of Medicine were randomized to receive hands-on scanning with pregnant women or hands-on scanning and fetal pig simulation. Biometric scans were performed before and after the course. The time to complete the scans, margin of error of biometric measurements, and number of technically adequate images per scan were compared between groups. Results - Twelve participants were randomized into each group. Although a direct comparison of postcourse biometric scans demonstrated no difference between groups, participants that received simulation training showed significant improvements in the time to complete the biometric scan (P <.05) and number of technically adequate images obtained (P <.05), whereas those who did not receive simulation training did not show significant improvements. Conclusions - Addition of the fetal pig ultrasound task trainer resulted in improvements in the course participants' scanning efficiency even after very limited exposure. Incorporating the task trainer earlier and more broadly into obstetric ultrasound training may benefit trainees.

AB - Objectives - The purpose of this study was to construct an inexpensive anatomy-based obstetric ultrasound task trainer and investigate whether introduction of this trainer into a hands-on obstetric ultrasound course improved course participants' ultrasound scanning skills. Methods - The trainer was created by placing fetal pigs into preservative-filled heat-sealed polyethylene bags. Twenty-four participants in an obstetric ultrasound course at Wake Forest School of Medicine were randomized to receive hands-on scanning with pregnant women or hands-on scanning and fetal pig simulation. Biometric scans were performed before and after the course. The time to complete the scans, margin of error of biometric measurements, and number of technically adequate images per scan were compared between groups. Results - Twelve participants were randomized into each group. Although a direct comparison of postcourse biometric scans demonstrated no difference between groups, participants that received simulation training showed significant improvements in the time to complete the biometric scan (P <.05) and number of technically adequate images obtained (P <.05), whereas those who did not receive simulation training did not show significant improvements. Conclusions - Addition of the fetal pig ultrasound task trainer resulted in improvements in the course participants' scanning efficiency even after very limited exposure. Incorporating the task trainer earlier and more broadly into obstetric ultrasound training may benefit trainees.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942789983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942789983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7863/ultra.15.14.12004

DO - 10.7863/ultra.15.14.12004

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 1793

EP - 1799

JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

SN - 0278-4297

IS - 10

ER -