Initial therapy for acute myocardial infarction

Socioeconomic implications and limitations

Rami Khouzam, David Apgar, Brendan Phibbs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The optimal therapeutic approach for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is still evolving; however, many would consider one of two basic options: "medical"-only thrombolysis or reperfusion, or an early (invasive), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The decision about which is most appropriate depends (perhaps unfortunately) on more than just medical factors. That is, the choice for some patients is also limited by payor source and the technical capabilities at the site of the initial treatment. Practically speaking, a significant portion of the US population simply does not have the option of (at least, initial) PCI. Methods and results: Kino Community Hospital in Tucson, AZ, serves primarily an indigent population in southern Arizona, near the border with Mexico. This facility does not have in-house capability for PCI. Therefore, shortly after the publication of the original Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 14 study (June 1999), we implemented their combination reperfusion protocol for the initial therapy of eligible patients admitted to the hospital with AMI. This report documents our experience with this medical reperfusion regimen in 42 patients over a span of almost 3 years. A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate outcome in 42 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction given the TIMI-14 reperfusion regimen. Complete resolution of ST-segment changes occurred in 30 patients (71.4%), with major bleeding complicating the therapy of only 3 patients (7.1%). After stabilization in our facility, 28 patients (66.6%) needed PCI. Conclusion: This report summarizes the experience of a small county hospital where medical thrombolysis is the only immediate therapy available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)457-460
Number of pages4
JournalChest
Volume126
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Myocardial Infarction
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Reperfusion
Therapeutics
County Hospitals
Community Hospital
Poverty
Mexico
Population
Publications
Hemorrhage

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Initial therapy for acute myocardial infarction : Socioeconomic implications and limitations. / Khouzam, Rami; Apgar, David; Phibbs, Brendan.

In: Chest, Vol. 126, No. 2, 01.01.2004, p. 457-460.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Khouzam, Rami ; Apgar, David ; Phibbs, Brendan. / Initial therapy for acute myocardial infarction : Socioeconomic implications and limitations. In: Chest. 2004 ; Vol. 126, No. 2. pp. 457-460.
@article{3f846b3ca20946bfb5042f50008d12e6,
title = "Initial therapy for acute myocardial infarction: Socioeconomic implications and limitations",
abstract = "Background: The optimal therapeutic approach for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is still evolving; however, many would consider one of two basic options: {"}medical{"}-only thrombolysis or reperfusion, or an early (invasive), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The decision about which is most appropriate depends (perhaps unfortunately) on more than just medical factors. That is, the choice for some patients is also limited by payor source and the technical capabilities at the site of the initial treatment. Practically speaking, a significant portion of the US population simply does not have the option of (at least, initial) PCI. Methods and results: Kino Community Hospital in Tucson, AZ, serves primarily an indigent population in southern Arizona, near the border with Mexico. This facility does not have in-house capability for PCI. Therefore, shortly after the publication of the original Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 14 study (June 1999), we implemented their combination reperfusion protocol for the initial therapy of eligible patients admitted to the hospital with AMI. This report documents our experience with this medical reperfusion regimen in 42 patients over a span of almost 3 years. A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate outcome in 42 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction given the TIMI-14 reperfusion regimen. Complete resolution of ST-segment changes occurred in 30 patients (71.4{\%}), with major bleeding complicating the therapy of only 3 patients (7.1{\%}). After stabilization in our facility, 28 patients (66.6{\%}) needed PCI. Conclusion: This report summarizes the experience of a small county hospital where medical thrombolysis is the only immediate therapy available.",
author = "Rami Khouzam and David Apgar and Brendan Phibbs",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1378/chest.126.2.457",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "457--460",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Initial therapy for acute myocardial infarction

T2 - Socioeconomic implications and limitations

AU - Khouzam, Rami

AU - Apgar, David

AU - Phibbs, Brendan

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Background: The optimal therapeutic approach for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is still evolving; however, many would consider one of two basic options: "medical"-only thrombolysis or reperfusion, or an early (invasive), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The decision about which is most appropriate depends (perhaps unfortunately) on more than just medical factors. That is, the choice for some patients is also limited by payor source and the technical capabilities at the site of the initial treatment. Practically speaking, a significant portion of the US population simply does not have the option of (at least, initial) PCI. Methods and results: Kino Community Hospital in Tucson, AZ, serves primarily an indigent population in southern Arizona, near the border with Mexico. This facility does not have in-house capability for PCI. Therefore, shortly after the publication of the original Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 14 study (June 1999), we implemented their combination reperfusion protocol for the initial therapy of eligible patients admitted to the hospital with AMI. This report documents our experience with this medical reperfusion regimen in 42 patients over a span of almost 3 years. A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate outcome in 42 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction given the TIMI-14 reperfusion regimen. Complete resolution of ST-segment changes occurred in 30 patients (71.4%), with major bleeding complicating the therapy of only 3 patients (7.1%). After stabilization in our facility, 28 patients (66.6%) needed PCI. Conclusion: This report summarizes the experience of a small county hospital where medical thrombolysis is the only immediate therapy available.

AB - Background: The optimal therapeutic approach for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is still evolving; however, many would consider one of two basic options: "medical"-only thrombolysis or reperfusion, or an early (invasive), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The decision about which is most appropriate depends (perhaps unfortunately) on more than just medical factors. That is, the choice for some patients is also limited by payor source and the technical capabilities at the site of the initial treatment. Practically speaking, a significant portion of the US population simply does not have the option of (at least, initial) PCI. Methods and results: Kino Community Hospital in Tucson, AZ, serves primarily an indigent population in southern Arizona, near the border with Mexico. This facility does not have in-house capability for PCI. Therefore, shortly after the publication of the original Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 14 study (June 1999), we implemented their combination reperfusion protocol for the initial therapy of eligible patients admitted to the hospital with AMI. This report documents our experience with this medical reperfusion regimen in 42 patients over a span of almost 3 years. A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate outcome in 42 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction given the TIMI-14 reperfusion regimen. Complete resolution of ST-segment changes occurred in 30 patients (71.4%), with major bleeding complicating the therapy of only 3 patients (7.1%). After stabilization in our facility, 28 patients (66.6%) needed PCI. Conclusion: This report summarizes the experience of a small county hospital where medical thrombolysis is the only immediate therapy available.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143087094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143087094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1378/chest.126.2.457

DO - 10.1378/chest.126.2.457

M3 - Article

VL - 126

SP - 457

EP - 460

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 2

ER -