Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient measurements from 2 to 9 MHz

Keith A. Wear, Timothy A. Stiles, Gary R. Frank, Ernest L. Madsen, Francis Cheng, Ernest J. Feleppa, Christopher S. Hall, Beom Soo Kim, Paul Lee, William D. O'Brien, Michael L. Oelze, Balasundar I. Raju, K. Kirk Shung, Thaddeus Wilson, Jian R. Yuan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

92 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. As are the attenuation coefficient and sound speed, the backscatter coefficient is a fundamental ultrasonic property that has been used to characterize many tissues. Unfortunately, there is currently far less standardization for the ultrasonic backscatter measurement than for the other two, as evidenced by a previous American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM)-sponsored interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter, attenuation, and speed measurements (J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18:615-631). To explore reasons for these disparities, the AIUM Endowment for Education and Research recently supported this second interlaboratory comparison, which extends the upper limit of the frequency range from 7 to 9 MHz. Methods. Eleven laboratories were provided with standard test objects designed and manufactured at the University of Wisconsin (Madison, WI). Each laboratory was asked to perform ultrasonic measurements of sound speed, attenuation coefficients, and backscatter coefficients. Each laboratory was blinded to the values of the ultrasonic properties of the test objects at the time the measurements were performed. Results. Eight of the 11 laboratories submitted results. The range of variation of absolute magnitude of backscatter coefficient measurements was about 2 orders of magnitude. If the results of 1 outlier laboratory are excluded, then the range is reduced to about 1 order of magnitude. Agreement regarding frequency dependence of backscatter was better than reported in the previous interlaboratory comparison. For example, when scatterers were small compared with the ultrasonic wavelength, experimental frequency-dependent backscatter coefficient data obtained by the participating laboratories were usually consistent with the expected Rayleigh scattering behavior (proportional to frequency to the fourth power). Conclusions. Greater standardization of backscatter measurement methods is needed. Measurements of frequency dependence of backscatter are more consistent than measurements of absolute magnitude.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1235-1250
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume24
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Ultrasonics
Medicine
Financial Management
Education
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Wear, K. A., Stiles, T. A., Frank, G. R., Madsen, E. L., Cheng, F., Feleppa, E. J., ... Yuan, J. R. (2005). Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient measurements from 2 to 9 MHz. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 24(9), 1235-1250. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2005.24.9.1235

Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient measurements from 2 to 9 MHz. / Wear, Keith A.; Stiles, Timothy A.; Frank, Gary R.; Madsen, Ernest L.; Cheng, Francis; Feleppa, Ernest J.; Hall, Christopher S.; Kim, Beom Soo; Lee, Paul; O'Brien, William D.; Oelze, Michael L.; Raju, Balasundar I.; Shung, K. Kirk; Wilson, Thaddeus; Yuan, Jian R.

In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 9, 01.01.2005, p. 1235-1250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wear, KA, Stiles, TA, Frank, GR, Madsen, EL, Cheng, F, Feleppa, EJ, Hall, CS, Kim, BS, Lee, P, O'Brien, WD, Oelze, ML, Raju, BI, Shung, KK, Wilson, T & Yuan, JR 2005, 'Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient measurements from 2 to 9 MHz', Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1235-1250. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2005.24.9.1235
Wear, Keith A. ; Stiles, Timothy A. ; Frank, Gary R. ; Madsen, Ernest L. ; Cheng, Francis ; Feleppa, Ernest J. ; Hall, Christopher S. ; Kim, Beom Soo ; Lee, Paul ; O'Brien, William D. ; Oelze, Michael L. ; Raju, Balasundar I. ; Shung, K. Kirk ; Wilson, Thaddeus ; Yuan, Jian R. / Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient measurements from 2 to 9 MHz. In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 24, No. 9. pp. 1235-1250.
@article{dfc8771aa9f749c3af925f1119ecbb48,
title = "Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient measurements from 2 to 9 MHz",
abstract = "Objective. As are the attenuation coefficient and sound speed, the backscatter coefficient is a fundamental ultrasonic property that has been used to characterize many tissues. Unfortunately, there is currently far less standardization for the ultrasonic backscatter measurement than for the other two, as evidenced by a previous American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM)-sponsored interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter, attenuation, and speed measurements (J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18:615-631). To explore reasons for these disparities, the AIUM Endowment for Education and Research recently supported this second interlaboratory comparison, which extends the upper limit of the frequency range from 7 to 9 MHz. Methods. Eleven laboratories were provided with standard test objects designed and manufactured at the University of Wisconsin (Madison, WI). Each laboratory was asked to perform ultrasonic measurements of sound speed, attenuation coefficients, and backscatter coefficients. Each laboratory was blinded to the values of the ultrasonic properties of the test objects at the time the measurements were performed. Results. Eight of the 11 laboratories submitted results. The range of variation of absolute magnitude of backscatter coefficient measurements was about 2 orders of magnitude. If the results of 1 outlier laboratory are excluded, then the range is reduced to about 1 order of magnitude. Agreement regarding frequency dependence of backscatter was better than reported in the previous interlaboratory comparison. For example, when scatterers were small compared with the ultrasonic wavelength, experimental frequency-dependent backscatter coefficient data obtained by the participating laboratories were usually consistent with the expected Rayleigh scattering behavior (proportional to frequency to the fourth power). Conclusions. Greater standardization of backscatter measurement methods is needed. Measurements of frequency dependence of backscatter are more consistent than measurements of absolute magnitude.",
author = "Wear, {Keith A.} and Stiles, {Timothy A.} and Frank, {Gary R.} and Madsen, {Ernest L.} and Francis Cheng and Feleppa, {Ernest J.} and Hall, {Christopher S.} and Kim, {Beom Soo} and Paul Lee and O'Brien, {William D.} and Oelze, {Michael L.} and Raju, {Balasundar I.} and Shung, {K. Kirk} and Thaddeus Wilson and Yuan, {Jian R.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7863/jum.2005.24.9.1235",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1235--1250",
journal = "Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine",
issn = "0278-4297",
publisher = "American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient measurements from 2 to 9 MHz

AU - Wear, Keith A.

AU - Stiles, Timothy A.

AU - Frank, Gary R.

AU - Madsen, Ernest L.

AU - Cheng, Francis

AU - Feleppa, Ernest J.

AU - Hall, Christopher S.

AU - Kim, Beom Soo

AU - Lee, Paul

AU - O'Brien, William D.

AU - Oelze, Michael L.

AU - Raju, Balasundar I.

AU - Shung, K. Kirk

AU - Wilson, Thaddeus

AU - Yuan, Jian R.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Objective. As are the attenuation coefficient and sound speed, the backscatter coefficient is a fundamental ultrasonic property that has been used to characterize many tissues. Unfortunately, there is currently far less standardization for the ultrasonic backscatter measurement than for the other two, as evidenced by a previous American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM)-sponsored interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter, attenuation, and speed measurements (J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18:615-631). To explore reasons for these disparities, the AIUM Endowment for Education and Research recently supported this second interlaboratory comparison, which extends the upper limit of the frequency range from 7 to 9 MHz. Methods. Eleven laboratories were provided with standard test objects designed and manufactured at the University of Wisconsin (Madison, WI). Each laboratory was asked to perform ultrasonic measurements of sound speed, attenuation coefficients, and backscatter coefficients. Each laboratory was blinded to the values of the ultrasonic properties of the test objects at the time the measurements were performed. Results. Eight of the 11 laboratories submitted results. The range of variation of absolute magnitude of backscatter coefficient measurements was about 2 orders of magnitude. If the results of 1 outlier laboratory are excluded, then the range is reduced to about 1 order of magnitude. Agreement regarding frequency dependence of backscatter was better than reported in the previous interlaboratory comparison. For example, when scatterers were small compared with the ultrasonic wavelength, experimental frequency-dependent backscatter coefficient data obtained by the participating laboratories were usually consistent with the expected Rayleigh scattering behavior (proportional to frequency to the fourth power). Conclusions. Greater standardization of backscatter measurement methods is needed. Measurements of frequency dependence of backscatter are more consistent than measurements of absolute magnitude.

AB - Objective. As are the attenuation coefficient and sound speed, the backscatter coefficient is a fundamental ultrasonic property that has been used to characterize many tissues. Unfortunately, there is currently far less standardization for the ultrasonic backscatter measurement than for the other two, as evidenced by a previous American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM)-sponsored interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter, attenuation, and speed measurements (J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18:615-631). To explore reasons for these disparities, the AIUM Endowment for Education and Research recently supported this second interlaboratory comparison, which extends the upper limit of the frequency range from 7 to 9 MHz. Methods. Eleven laboratories were provided with standard test objects designed and manufactured at the University of Wisconsin (Madison, WI). Each laboratory was asked to perform ultrasonic measurements of sound speed, attenuation coefficients, and backscatter coefficients. Each laboratory was blinded to the values of the ultrasonic properties of the test objects at the time the measurements were performed. Results. Eight of the 11 laboratories submitted results. The range of variation of absolute magnitude of backscatter coefficient measurements was about 2 orders of magnitude. If the results of 1 outlier laboratory are excluded, then the range is reduced to about 1 order of magnitude. Agreement regarding frequency dependence of backscatter was better than reported in the previous interlaboratory comparison. For example, when scatterers were small compared with the ultrasonic wavelength, experimental frequency-dependent backscatter coefficient data obtained by the participating laboratories were usually consistent with the expected Rayleigh scattering behavior (proportional to frequency to the fourth power). Conclusions. Greater standardization of backscatter measurement methods is needed. Measurements of frequency dependence of backscatter are more consistent than measurements of absolute magnitude.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24144460550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24144460550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7863/jum.2005.24.9.1235

DO - 10.7863/jum.2005.24.9.1235

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 1235

EP - 1250

JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

SN - 0278-4297

IS - 9

ER -