Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma

Urologic pathologists

William C. Allsbrook, Kathy A. Mangold, Maribeth H. Johnson, Roger B. Lane, Cynthia G. Lane, Mahul Amin, David G. Bostwick, Peter A. Humphrey, Edward C. Jones, Victor E. Reuter, Wael Sakr, Isabell A. Sesterhenn, Patricia Troncoso, Thomas M. Wheeler, Jonathan I. Epstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

192 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Gleason grading is now the most widely used grading system for prostatic carcinoma in the United States. However, there are only a few studies of the interobserver reproducibility of this system, and no extensive study of interobserver reproducibility among a large number of experienced urologic pathologists exists. Forty-six needle biopsies containing prostatic carcinoma were assigned Gleason scores by 10 urologic pathologists. The overall weighted kappa coefficient κw for Gleason score for each of the urologic pathologists compared with each of the remaining urologic pathologists ranged from 0.56 to 0.70, all but one being at least 0.60 (substantial agreement). The overall kappa coefficient κ for each pathologist compared with the others for Gleason score groups 2-4, 5-6, 7, and 8-10 ranged from 0.47 to 0.64 (moderate-substantial agreement), only one less than 0.50. At least 70% of the urologic pathologists agreed on the Gleason grade group (2-4, 5-6, 7, 8-10) in 38 ("consensus" cases) of the 46 cases. The 8 "nonconsensus" cases included low-grade tumors, tumors with small cribriform proliferations, and tumors whose histology was on the border between Gleason patterns. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading among urologic pathologists is in an acceptable range.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-80
Number of pages7
JournalHuman Pathology
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neoplasm Grading
Carcinoma
Neoplasms
Needle Biopsy
Pathologists
Histology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Allsbrook, W. C., Mangold, K. A., Johnson, M. H., Lane, R. B., Lane, C. G., Amin, M., ... Epstein, J. I. (2001). Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists. Human Pathology, 32(1), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2001.21134

Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma : Urologic pathologists. / Allsbrook, William C.; Mangold, Kathy A.; Johnson, Maribeth H.; Lane, Roger B.; Lane, Cynthia G.; Amin, Mahul; Bostwick, David G.; Humphrey, Peter A.; Jones, Edward C.; Reuter, Victor E.; Sakr, Wael; Sesterhenn, Isabell A.; Troncoso, Patricia; Wheeler, Thomas M.; Epstein, Jonathan I.

In: Human Pathology, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 74-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Allsbrook, WC, Mangold, KA, Johnson, MH, Lane, RB, Lane, CG, Amin, M, Bostwick, DG, Humphrey, PA, Jones, EC, Reuter, VE, Sakr, W, Sesterhenn, IA, Troncoso, P, Wheeler, TM & Epstein, JI 2001, 'Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists', Human Pathology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2001.21134
Allsbrook, William C. ; Mangold, Kathy A. ; Johnson, Maribeth H. ; Lane, Roger B. ; Lane, Cynthia G. ; Amin, Mahul ; Bostwick, David G. ; Humphrey, Peter A. ; Jones, Edward C. ; Reuter, Victor E. ; Sakr, Wael ; Sesterhenn, Isabell A. ; Troncoso, Patricia ; Wheeler, Thomas M. ; Epstein, Jonathan I. / Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma : Urologic pathologists. In: Human Pathology. 2001 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 74-80.
@article{3976a081ae5c4643bc3cb913e4b0469d,
title = "Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists",
abstract = "Gleason grading is now the most widely used grading system for prostatic carcinoma in the United States. However, there are only a few studies of the interobserver reproducibility of this system, and no extensive study of interobserver reproducibility among a large number of experienced urologic pathologists exists. Forty-six needle biopsies containing prostatic carcinoma were assigned Gleason scores by 10 urologic pathologists. The overall weighted kappa coefficient κw for Gleason score for each of the urologic pathologists compared with each of the remaining urologic pathologists ranged from 0.56 to 0.70, all but one being at least 0.60 (substantial agreement). The overall kappa coefficient κ for each pathologist compared with the others for Gleason score groups 2-4, 5-6, 7, and 8-10 ranged from 0.47 to 0.64 (moderate-substantial agreement), only one less than 0.50. At least 70{\%} of the urologic pathologists agreed on the Gleason grade group (2-4, 5-6, 7, 8-10) in 38 ({"}consensus{"} cases) of the 46 cases. The 8 {"}nonconsensus{"} cases included low-grade tumors, tumors with small cribriform proliferations, and tumors whose histology was on the border between Gleason patterns. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading among urologic pathologists is in an acceptable range.",
author = "Allsbrook, {William C.} and Mangold, {Kathy A.} and Johnson, {Maribeth H.} and Lane, {Roger B.} and Lane, {Cynthia G.} and Mahul Amin and Bostwick, {David G.} and Humphrey, {Peter A.} and Jones, {Edward C.} and Reuter, {Victor E.} and Wael Sakr and Sesterhenn, {Isabell A.} and Patricia Troncoso and Wheeler, {Thomas M.} and Epstein, {Jonathan I.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/hupa.2001.21134",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "74--80",
journal = "Human Pathology",
issn = "0046-8177",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma

T2 - Urologic pathologists

AU - Allsbrook, William C.

AU - Mangold, Kathy A.

AU - Johnson, Maribeth H.

AU - Lane, Roger B.

AU - Lane, Cynthia G.

AU - Amin, Mahul

AU - Bostwick, David G.

AU - Humphrey, Peter A.

AU - Jones, Edward C.

AU - Reuter, Victor E.

AU - Sakr, Wael

AU - Sesterhenn, Isabell A.

AU - Troncoso, Patricia

AU - Wheeler, Thomas M.

AU - Epstein, Jonathan I.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Gleason grading is now the most widely used grading system for prostatic carcinoma in the United States. However, there are only a few studies of the interobserver reproducibility of this system, and no extensive study of interobserver reproducibility among a large number of experienced urologic pathologists exists. Forty-six needle biopsies containing prostatic carcinoma were assigned Gleason scores by 10 urologic pathologists. The overall weighted kappa coefficient κw for Gleason score for each of the urologic pathologists compared with each of the remaining urologic pathologists ranged from 0.56 to 0.70, all but one being at least 0.60 (substantial agreement). The overall kappa coefficient κ for each pathologist compared with the others for Gleason score groups 2-4, 5-6, 7, and 8-10 ranged from 0.47 to 0.64 (moderate-substantial agreement), only one less than 0.50. At least 70% of the urologic pathologists agreed on the Gleason grade group (2-4, 5-6, 7, 8-10) in 38 ("consensus" cases) of the 46 cases. The 8 "nonconsensus" cases included low-grade tumors, tumors with small cribriform proliferations, and tumors whose histology was on the border between Gleason patterns. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading among urologic pathologists is in an acceptable range.

AB - Gleason grading is now the most widely used grading system for prostatic carcinoma in the United States. However, there are only a few studies of the interobserver reproducibility of this system, and no extensive study of interobserver reproducibility among a large number of experienced urologic pathologists exists. Forty-six needle biopsies containing prostatic carcinoma were assigned Gleason scores by 10 urologic pathologists. The overall weighted kappa coefficient κw for Gleason score for each of the urologic pathologists compared with each of the remaining urologic pathologists ranged from 0.56 to 0.70, all but one being at least 0.60 (substantial agreement). The overall kappa coefficient κ for each pathologist compared with the others for Gleason score groups 2-4, 5-6, 7, and 8-10 ranged from 0.47 to 0.64 (moderate-substantial agreement), only one less than 0.50. At least 70% of the urologic pathologists agreed on the Gleason grade group (2-4, 5-6, 7, 8-10) in 38 ("consensus" cases) of the 46 cases. The 8 "nonconsensus" cases included low-grade tumors, tumors with small cribriform proliferations, and tumors whose histology was on the border between Gleason patterns. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading among urologic pathologists is in an acceptable range.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035126050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035126050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/hupa.2001.21134

DO - 10.1053/hupa.2001.21134

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 74

EP - 80

JO - Human Pathology

JF - Human Pathology

SN - 0046-8177

IS - 1

ER -