Interpretations and Treatment Decisions Based on MR Angiography versus Conventional Arteriography in Symptomatic Lower Extremity Ischemia

John Snidow, Veronica J. Harris, Scott O. Trerotola, Dolores F. Cikrit, Stephen G. Lalka, Kenneth A. Buckwalter, Matthew S. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the frequency with which treatment plans based on findings at magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) match those based on findings at conventional x-ray arteriography (XRA) in the evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. Patients and Methods: Two-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) MRA was performed in 42 patients undergoing XRA for evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. The blind interpretations and treatment plans based on MRA findings were compared with those based on XRA findings, with use of XRA as the standard of reference. Results: For identification of hemodynamically significant stenosis or occlusion, the sensitivity and specificity of MRA was 100% and 23% for iliac segments, 100% and 82% for common femoral segments, 89% and 67% for superficial femoral segments, 100% and 88% for popliteal segments, and 92% and 91% for tibioperoneal segments, respectively. The treatment plan based on MRA findings matched that based on XRA findings in 41% of patients. Conclusion: For evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia, two-dimensional TOF MRA cannot be considered a reliable substitute for XRA in patients who lack contraindications to XRA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)595-603
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Lower Extremity
Angiography
Ischemia
X-Rays
Thigh
Therapeutics
Pathologic Constriction
Sensitivity and Specificity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Interpretations and Treatment Decisions Based on MR Angiography versus Conventional Arteriography in Symptomatic Lower Extremity Ischemia. / Snidow, John; Harris, Veronica J.; Trerotola, Scott O.; Cikrit, Dolores F.; Lalka, Stephen G.; Buckwalter, Kenneth A.; Johnson, Matthew S.

In: Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 6, No. 4, 01.01.1995, p. 595-603.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Snidow, John ; Harris, Veronica J. ; Trerotola, Scott O. ; Cikrit, Dolores F. ; Lalka, Stephen G. ; Buckwalter, Kenneth A. ; Johnson, Matthew S. / Interpretations and Treatment Decisions Based on MR Angiography versus Conventional Arteriography in Symptomatic Lower Extremity Ischemia. In: Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 1995 ; Vol. 6, No. 4. pp. 595-603.
@article{a85506d8ab4c461e9069788eec5b1525,
title = "Interpretations and Treatment Decisions Based on MR Angiography versus Conventional Arteriography in Symptomatic Lower Extremity Ischemia",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine the frequency with which treatment plans based on findings at magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) match those based on findings at conventional x-ray arteriography (XRA) in the evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. Patients and Methods: Two-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) MRA was performed in 42 patients undergoing XRA for evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. The blind interpretations and treatment plans based on MRA findings were compared with those based on XRA findings, with use of XRA as the standard of reference. Results: For identification of hemodynamically significant stenosis or occlusion, the sensitivity and specificity of MRA was 100{\%} and 23{\%} for iliac segments, 100{\%} and 82{\%} for common femoral segments, 89{\%} and 67{\%} for superficial femoral segments, 100{\%} and 88{\%} for popliteal segments, and 92{\%} and 91{\%} for tibioperoneal segments, respectively. The treatment plan based on MRA findings matched that based on XRA findings in 41{\%} of patients. Conclusion: For evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia, two-dimensional TOF MRA cannot be considered a reliable substitute for XRA in patients who lack contraindications to XRA.",
author = "John Snidow and Harris, {Veronica J.} and Trerotola, {Scott O.} and Cikrit, {Dolores F.} and Lalka, {Stephen G.} and Buckwalter, {Kenneth A.} and Johnson, {Matthew S.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1051-0443(95)71143-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "595--603",
journal = "Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology",
issn = "1051-0443",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpretations and Treatment Decisions Based on MR Angiography versus Conventional Arteriography in Symptomatic Lower Extremity Ischemia

AU - Snidow, John

AU - Harris, Veronica J.

AU - Trerotola, Scott O.

AU - Cikrit, Dolores F.

AU - Lalka, Stephen G.

AU - Buckwalter, Kenneth A.

AU - Johnson, Matthew S.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To determine the frequency with which treatment plans based on findings at magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) match those based on findings at conventional x-ray arteriography (XRA) in the evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. Patients and Methods: Two-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) MRA was performed in 42 patients undergoing XRA for evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. The blind interpretations and treatment plans based on MRA findings were compared with those based on XRA findings, with use of XRA as the standard of reference. Results: For identification of hemodynamically significant stenosis or occlusion, the sensitivity and specificity of MRA was 100% and 23% for iliac segments, 100% and 82% for common femoral segments, 89% and 67% for superficial femoral segments, 100% and 88% for popliteal segments, and 92% and 91% for tibioperoneal segments, respectively. The treatment plan based on MRA findings matched that based on XRA findings in 41% of patients. Conclusion: For evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia, two-dimensional TOF MRA cannot be considered a reliable substitute for XRA in patients who lack contraindications to XRA.

AB - Purpose: To determine the frequency with which treatment plans based on findings at magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) match those based on findings at conventional x-ray arteriography (XRA) in the evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. Patients and Methods: Two-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) MRA was performed in 42 patients undergoing XRA for evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. The blind interpretations and treatment plans based on MRA findings were compared with those based on XRA findings, with use of XRA as the standard of reference. Results: For identification of hemodynamically significant stenosis or occlusion, the sensitivity and specificity of MRA was 100% and 23% for iliac segments, 100% and 82% for common femoral segments, 89% and 67% for superficial femoral segments, 100% and 88% for popliteal segments, and 92% and 91% for tibioperoneal segments, respectively. The treatment plan based on MRA findings matched that based on XRA findings in 41% of patients. Conclusion: For evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia, two-dimensional TOF MRA cannot be considered a reliable substitute for XRA in patients who lack contraindications to XRA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029336547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029336547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1051-0443(95)71143-5

DO - 10.1016/S1051-0443(95)71143-5

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 595

EP - 603

JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

SN - 1051-0443

IS - 4

ER -