IPS Empress inlays luted with a self-adhesive resin cement after 1 year

Michael Taschner, Roland Frankenberger, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Silke Rosenbusch, Anselm Petschelt, Norbert Krämer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To prospectively compare the clinical performance of two different resin composites for luting IPS Empress inlays and onlays. Methods: 83 IPS Empress restorations were placed in 30 subjects. All restorations were inserted under rubber dam. 43 inlays/onlays were luted with a self-adhesive resin cement [RelyX Unicem (RX)]. A multistep adhesive (Syntac) was used with Variolink II low viscosity (SV) and served as control (n=40). The restorations were evaluated after 2 weeks: Baseline = 1st recall (R1), after 6 months (R2) and after 1 year (R3) by two calibrated examiners using the modified USPHS criteria. Results: From R1 to R3, one failure was noticed in the SV group (R2) due to marginal enamel chipping. After 1 year of clinical service, SV revealed significantly better results regarding color match and integrity inlay (Mann-Whitney U-test, P< 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between SV and RX for the remaining criteria (Mann-Whitney U-test, P>0.05). (Am J Dent 2009;22:).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-59
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Dentistry
Volume22
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Resin Cements
Inlays
Rubber Dams
United States Public Health Service
Composite Resins
Dental Enamel
Nonparametric Statistics
Viscosity
Adhesives
Color
Adhesive cement

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Taschner, M., Frankenberger, R., Garcia-Godoy, F., Rosenbusch, S., Petschelt, A., & Krämer, N. (2009). IPS Empress inlays luted with a self-adhesive resin cement after 1 year. American Journal of Dentistry, 22(1), 55-59.

IPS Empress inlays luted with a self-adhesive resin cement after 1 year. / Taschner, Michael; Frankenberger, Roland; Garcia-Godoy, Franklin; Rosenbusch, Silke; Petschelt, Anselm; Krämer, Norbert.

In: American Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.02.2009, p. 55-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Taschner, M, Frankenberger, R, Garcia-Godoy, F, Rosenbusch, S, Petschelt, A & Krämer, N 2009, 'IPS Empress inlays luted with a self-adhesive resin cement after 1 year', American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 55-59.
Taschner M, Frankenberger R, Garcia-Godoy F, Rosenbusch S, Petschelt A, Krämer N. IPS Empress inlays luted with a self-adhesive resin cement after 1 year. American Journal of Dentistry. 2009 Feb 1;22(1):55-59.
Taschner, Michael ; Frankenberger, Roland ; Garcia-Godoy, Franklin ; Rosenbusch, Silke ; Petschelt, Anselm ; Krämer, Norbert. / IPS Empress inlays luted with a self-adhesive resin cement after 1 year. In: American Journal of Dentistry. 2009 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 55-59.
@article{6864f7c9da454a8d8550b7423e419306,
title = "IPS Empress inlays luted with a self-adhesive resin cement after 1 year",
abstract = "To prospectively compare the clinical performance of two different resin composites for luting IPS Empress inlays and onlays. Methods: 83 IPS Empress restorations were placed in 30 subjects. All restorations were inserted under rubber dam. 43 inlays/onlays were luted with a self-adhesive resin cement [RelyX Unicem (RX)]. A multistep adhesive (Syntac) was used with Variolink II low viscosity (SV) and served as control (n=40). The restorations were evaluated after 2 weeks: Baseline = 1st recall (R1), after 6 months (R2) and after 1 year (R3) by two calibrated examiners using the modified USPHS criteria. Results: From R1 to R3, one failure was noticed in the SV group (R2) due to marginal enamel chipping. After 1 year of clinical service, SV revealed significantly better results regarding color match and integrity inlay (Mann-Whitney U-test, P< 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between SV and RX for the remaining criteria (Mann-Whitney U-test, P>0.05). (Am J Dent 2009;22:).",
author = "Michael Taschner and Roland Frankenberger and Franklin Garcia-Godoy and Silke Rosenbusch and Anselm Petschelt and Norbert Kr{\"a}mer",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "55--59",
journal = "American Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0894-8275",
publisher = "Mosher and Linder, Inc",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - IPS Empress inlays luted with a self-adhesive resin cement after 1 year

AU - Taschner, Michael

AU - Frankenberger, Roland

AU - Garcia-Godoy, Franklin

AU - Rosenbusch, Silke

AU - Petschelt, Anselm

AU - Krämer, Norbert

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - To prospectively compare the clinical performance of two different resin composites for luting IPS Empress inlays and onlays. Methods: 83 IPS Empress restorations were placed in 30 subjects. All restorations were inserted under rubber dam. 43 inlays/onlays were luted with a self-adhesive resin cement [RelyX Unicem (RX)]. A multistep adhesive (Syntac) was used with Variolink II low viscosity (SV) and served as control (n=40). The restorations were evaluated after 2 weeks: Baseline = 1st recall (R1), after 6 months (R2) and after 1 year (R3) by two calibrated examiners using the modified USPHS criteria. Results: From R1 to R3, one failure was noticed in the SV group (R2) due to marginal enamel chipping. After 1 year of clinical service, SV revealed significantly better results regarding color match and integrity inlay (Mann-Whitney U-test, P< 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between SV and RX for the remaining criteria (Mann-Whitney U-test, P>0.05). (Am J Dent 2009;22:).

AB - To prospectively compare the clinical performance of two different resin composites for luting IPS Empress inlays and onlays. Methods: 83 IPS Empress restorations were placed in 30 subjects. All restorations were inserted under rubber dam. 43 inlays/onlays were luted with a self-adhesive resin cement [RelyX Unicem (RX)]. A multistep adhesive (Syntac) was used with Variolink II low viscosity (SV) and served as control (n=40). The restorations were evaluated after 2 weeks: Baseline = 1st recall (R1), after 6 months (R2) and after 1 year (R3) by two calibrated examiners using the modified USPHS criteria. Results: From R1 to R3, one failure was noticed in the SV group (R2) due to marginal enamel chipping. After 1 year of clinical service, SV revealed significantly better results regarding color match and integrity inlay (Mann-Whitney U-test, P< 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between SV and RX for the remaining criteria (Mann-Whitney U-test, P>0.05). (Am J Dent 2009;22:).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66149155458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66149155458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 55

EP - 59

JO - American Journal of Dentistry

JF - American Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0894-8275

IS - 1

ER -