Keystone perforator island flap as an alternative reconstructive option for partial thickness alar defects up to 1.5centimeters

Epameinondas Kostopoulos, Christos Agiannidis, Petros Konofaos, Ioannis Kotsakis, Grigorios Champsas, Marios Frangoulis, Othon Papadopoulos, Vincent Casoli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The ala is a unique landmark of the nose disposing aesthetic and functional properties. The head and neck area is the main site of appearance of nonmelanoma skin cancer. One third of them are located in the nose with an alar preponderance compared with other nasal subunits. Correction of alar defects is a challenging reconstructive task. The keystone perforator island flap (KPIF) was introduced as an alternative in nasal reconstruction by senior authors. In the present case series, KPIFs' application is introduced into the alar subunit as an alternative, versatile, and reproducible reconstructive option, even for the novice plastic surgeon. Materials and Methods: From April 2014 to September 2015, patients presenting with partial thickness alar defects (≤1.5 cm) secondary to tumor extirpation sustained reconstruction with different types of KPIF. Results: A total of 31 patients (mean age of 72 years) were treated with various types of KPIF. The mean diameter of the defect was 1.14cm. The vast majority of reconstructions concerned a type IV KPIF (18/31 or 58.1%). Sometimes an upward alar retraction was noted. A minimal rim wedge excision was performed (≤0.3mm) using counterbalancing correcting sutures. All flaps survived without any sign of venous congestion, whereas the rim healed uneventfully. The mean follow-up period was 6.5 months. Conclusions: KPIF was introduced as a single-stage alternative reconstructive option for partial thickness alar defects, completing author's experience with this flap into such a challenging and aesthetically critical anatomic area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1256-1260
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Perforator Flap
Surgical Flaps
Nose
Hyperemia
Skin Neoplasms
Esthetics
Sutures
daminozide
Neck
Head
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Keystone perforator island flap as an alternative reconstructive option for partial thickness alar defects up to 1.5centimeters. / Kostopoulos, Epameinondas; Agiannidis, Christos; Konofaos, Petros; Kotsakis, Ioannis; Champsas, Grigorios; Frangoulis, Marios; Papadopoulos, Othon; Casoli, Vincent.

In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Vol. 27, No. 5, 01.07.2016, p. 1256-1260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kostopoulos, Epameinondas ; Agiannidis, Christos ; Konofaos, Petros ; Kotsakis, Ioannis ; Champsas, Grigorios ; Frangoulis, Marios ; Papadopoulos, Othon ; Casoli, Vincent. / Keystone perforator island flap as an alternative reconstructive option for partial thickness alar defects up to 1.5centimeters. In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 27, No. 5. pp. 1256-1260.
@article{0e3c7d27766247cf85d00be9317f0181,
title = "Keystone perforator island flap as an alternative reconstructive option for partial thickness alar defects up to 1.5centimeters",
abstract = "Introduction: The ala is a unique landmark of the nose disposing aesthetic and functional properties. The head and neck area is the main site of appearance of nonmelanoma skin cancer. One third of them are located in the nose with an alar preponderance compared with other nasal subunits. Correction of alar defects is a challenging reconstructive task. The keystone perforator island flap (KPIF) was introduced as an alternative in nasal reconstruction by senior authors. In the present case series, KPIFs' application is introduced into the alar subunit as an alternative, versatile, and reproducible reconstructive option, even for the novice plastic surgeon. Materials and Methods: From April 2014 to September 2015, patients presenting with partial thickness alar defects (≤1.5 cm) secondary to tumor extirpation sustained reconstruction with different types of KPIF. Results: A total of 31 patients (mean age of 72 years) were treated with various types of KPIF. The mean diameter of the defect was 1.14cm. The vast majority of reconstructions concerned a type IV KPIF (18/31 or 58.1{\%}). Sometimes an upward alar retraction was noted. A minimal rim wedge excision was performed (≤0.3mm) using counterbalancing correcting sutures. All flaps survived without any sign of venous congestion, whereas the rim healed uneventfully. The mean follow-up period was 6.5 months. Conclusions: KPIF was introduced as a single-stage alternative reconstructive option for partial thickness alar defects, completing author's experience with this flap into such a challenging and aesthetically critical anatomic area.",
author = "Epameinondas Kostopoulos and Christos Agiannidis and Petros Konofaos and Ioannis Kotsakis and Grigorios Champsas and Marios Frangoulis and Othon Papadopoulos and Vincent Casoli",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SCS.0000000000002742",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1256--1260",
journal = "Journal of Craniofacial Surgery",
issn = "1049-2275",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Keystone perforator island flap as an alternative reconstructive option for partial thickness alar defects up to 1.5centimeters

AU - Kostopoulos, Epameinondas

AU - Agiannidis, Christos

AU - Konofaos, Petros

AU - Kotsakis, Ioannis

AU - Champsas, Grigorios

AU - Frangoulis, Marios

AU - Papadopoulos, Othon

AU - Casoli, Vincent

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Introduction: The ala is a unique landmark of the nose disposing aesthetic and functional properties. The head and neck area is the main site of appearance of nonmelanoma skin cancer. One third of them are located in the nose with an alar preponderance compared with other nasal subunits. Correction of alar defects is a challenging reconstructive task. The keystone perforator island flap (KPIF) was introduced as an alternative in nasal reconstruction by senior authors. In the present case series, KPIFs' application is introduced into the alar subunit as an alternative, versatile, and reproducible reconstructive option, even for the novice plastic surgeon. Materials and Methods: From April 2014 to September 2015, patients presenting with partial thickness alar defects (≤1.5 cm) secondary to tumor extirpation sustained reconstruction with different types of KPIF. Results: A total of 31 patients (mean age of 72 years) were treated with various types of KPIF. The mean diameter of the defect was 1.14cm. The vast majority of reconstructions concerned a type IV KPIF (18/31 or 58.1%). Sometimes an upward alar retraction was noted. A minimal rim wedge excision was performed (≤0.3mm) using counterbalancing correcting sutures. All flaps survived without any sign of venous congestion, whereas the rim healed uneventfully. The mean follow-up period was 6.5 months. Conclusions: KPIF was introduced as a single-stage alternative reconstructive option for partial thickness alar defects, completing author's experience with this flap into such a challenging and aesthetically critical anatomic area.

AB - Introduction: The ala is a unique landmark of the nose disposing aesthetic and functional properties. The head and neck area is the main site of appearance of nonmelanoma skin cancer. One third of them are located in the nose with an alar preponderance compared with other nasal subunits. Correction of alar defects is a challenging reconstructive task. The keystone perforator island flap (KPIF) was introduced as an alternative in nasal reconstruction by senior authors. In the present case series, KPIFs' application is introduced into the alar subunit as an alternative, versatile, and reproducible reconstructive option, even for the novice plastic surgeon. Materials and Methods: From April 2014 to September 2015, patients presenting with partial thickness alar defects (≤1.5 cm) secondary to tumor extirpation sustained reconstruction with different types of KPIF. Results: A total of 31 patients (mean age of 72 years) were treated with various types of KPIF. The mean diameter of the defect was 1.14cm. The vast majority of reconstructions concerned a type IV KPIF (18/31 or 58.1%). Sometimes an upward alar retraction was noted. A minimal rim wedge excision was performed (≤0.3mm) using counterbalancing correcting sutures. All flaps survived without any sign of venous congestion, whereas the rim healed uneventfully. The mean follow-up period was 6.5 months. Conclusions: KPIF was introduced as a single-stage alternative reconstructive option for partial thickness alar defects, completing author's experience with this flap into such a challenging and aesthetically critical anatomic area.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978674824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978674824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002742

DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002742

M3 - Article

C2 - 27391497

AN - SCOPUS:84978674824

VL - 27

SP - 1256

EP - 1260

JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

SN - 1049-2275

IS - 5

ER -