Lack of prognostic significance of histological grade in node-negative invasive breast carcinoma

Mamoun Younes, Rodolfo Laucirica

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Histological grade (HG), as modified by Elston and Ellis (Histopathology, 19: 403-410, 1991), was shown to be a significant prognostic indicator in a large group of women with invasive breast cancer, who had node-negative as well as node-positive tumors and included special types of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of HG as a prognostic indicator in node-negative invasive breast cancer, no special type (NN-BCA-NST), which represents the majority of cases seen in clinical practice. One hundred eighty-two women with NN-BCA-NST and who had 28-106 months follow-up (mean, 73 months; median, 71 months) were entered in the study. Bilateral and multifocal cancers, and cancers with distant metastases, were excluded. Nuclear grade (NG), tubule formation (TF), mitotic index (MI), and HG were determined and scored as described by Elston and Ellis (Histopathology, 19: 403-410, 1991). Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between NG, TF, and MI. There was significant correlation between NG and MI (R = 0.667, P < 0.0001) and between TF and MI (R = 0.416, P < 0.0001). NG, TF, MI, and HG did not have significant prognostic value (P = 0.3771, P = 0.7972, P = 0.2953, and P = 0.7946, respectively). HG was of no significant prognostic value even after women who received adjuvant therapy were excluded from the analysis (P = 0.3917). Our data show that the HG is not a reliable prognostic indicator in NN-BCA-NST.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)601-604
Number of pages4
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume3
Issue number4
StatePublished - May 30 1997

Fingerprint

Mitotic Index
Breast Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Survival Analysis
Regression Analysis
Neoplasm Metastasis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Lack of prognostic significance of histological grade in node-negative invasive breast carcinoma. / Younes, Mamoun; Laucirica, Rodolfo.

In: Clinical Cancer Research, Vol. 3, No. 4, 30.05.1997, p. 601-604.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{756e84c0544a4bbf9d9478f8001522e2,
title = "Lack of prognostic significance of histological grade in node-negative invasive breast carcinoma",
abstract = "Histological grade (HG), as modified by Elston and Ellis (Histopathology, 19: 403-410, 1991), was shown to be a significant prognostic indicator in a large group of women with invasive breast cancer, who had node-negative as well as node-positive tumors and included special types of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of HG as a prognostic indicator in node-negative invasive breast cancer, no special type (NN-BCA-NST), which represents the majority of cases seen in clinical practice. One hundred eighty-two women with NN-BCA-NST and who had 28-106 months follow-up (mean, 73 months; median, 71 months) were entered in the study. Bilateral and multifocal cancers, and cancers with distant metastases, were excluded. Nuclear grade (NG), tubule formation (TF), mitotic index (MI), and HG were determined and scored as described by Elston and Ellis (Histopathology, 19: 403-410, 1991). Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between NG, TF, and MI. There was significant correlation between NG and MI (R = 0.667, P < 0.0001) and between TF and MI (R = 0.416, P < 0.0001). NG, TF, MI, and HG did not have significant prognostic value (P = 0.3771, P = 0.7972, P = 0.2953, and P = 0.7946, respectively). HG was of no significant prognostic value even after women who received adjuvant therapy were excluded from the analysis (P = 0.3917). Our data show that the HG is not a reliable prognostic indicator in NN-BCA-NST.",
author = "Mamoun Younes and Rodolfo Laucirica",
year = "1997",
month = "5",
day = "30",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "601--604",
journal = "Clinical Cancer Research",
issn = "1078-0432",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lack of prognostic significance of histological grade in node-negative invasive breast carcinoma

AU - Younes, Mamoun

AU - Laucirica, Rodolfo

PY - 1997/5/30

Y1 - 1997/5/30

N2 - Histological grade (HG), as modified by Elston and Ellis (Histopathology, 19: 403-410, 1991), was shown to be a significant prognostic indicator in a large group of women with invasive breast cancer, who had node-negative as well as node-positive tumors and included special types of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of HG as a prognostic indicator in node-negative invasive breast cancer, no special type (NN-BCA-NST), which represents the majority of cases seen in clinical practice. One hundred eighty-two women with NN-BCA-NST and who had 28-106 months follow-up (mean, 73 months; median, 71 months) were entered in the study. Bilateral and multifocal cancers, and cancers with distant metastases, were excluded. Nuclear grade (NG), tubule formation (TF), mitotic index (MI), and HG were determined and scored as described by Elston and Ellis (Histopathology, 19: 403-410, 1991). Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between NG, TF, and MI. There was significant correlation between NG and MI (R = 0.667, P < 0.0001) and between TF and MI (R = 0.416, P < 0.0001). NG, TF, MI, and HG did not have significant prognostic value (P = 0.3771, P = 0.7972, P = 0.2953, and P = 0.7946, respectively). HG was of no significant prognostic value even after women who received adjuvant therapy were excluded from the analysis (P = 0.3917). Our data show that the HG is not a reliable prognostic indicator in NN-BCA-NST.

AB - Histological grade (HG), as modified by Elston and Ellis (Histopathology, 19: 403-410, 1991), was shown to be a significant prognostic indicator in a large group of women with invasive breast cancer, who had node-negative as well as node-positive tumors and included special types of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of HG as a prognostic indicator in node-negative invasive breast cancer, no special type (NN-BCA-NST), which represents the majority of cases seen in clinical practice. One hundred eighty-two women with NN-BCA-NST and who had 28-106 months follow-up (mean, 73 months; median, 71 months) were entered in the study. Bilateral and multifocal cancers, and cancers with distant metastases, were excluded. Nuclear grade (NG), tubule formation (TF), mitotic index (MI), and HG were determined and scored as described by Elston and Ellis (Histopathology, 19: 403-410, 1991). Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between NG, TF, and MI. There was significant correlation between NG and MI (R = 0.667, P < 0.0001) and between TF and MI (R = 0.416, P < 0.0001). NG, TF, MI, and HG did not have significant prognostic value (P = 0.3771, P = 0.7972, P = 0.2953, and P = 0.7946, respectively). HG was of no significant prognostic value even after women who received adjuvant therapy were excluded from the analysis (P = 0.3917). Our data show that the HG is not a reliable prognostic indicator in NN-BCA-NST.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030964321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030964321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9815726

AN - SCOPUS:0030964321

VL - 3

SP - 601

EP - 604

JO - Clinical Cancer Research

JF - Clinical Cancer Research

SN - 1078-0432

IS - 4

ER -