Misreporting of Energy Intake in the Elderly Using Doubly Labeled Water to Measure Total Energy Expenditure and Weight Change

for the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: One of the major problems in dietary assessment is inaccuracy in reporting diet. Objective: To examine the association between self-reported energy intake (EI) by food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and energy expenditure (EE), measured by doubly labeled water (DLW), among older persons. Design: EE was assessed in 298 high-functioning, community-dwelling older adults (70–79 years of age) over a 2-week period using DLW. Dietary intake was assessed using a Block FFQ. The ratio between reported EI and total energy expenditure (TEE) was calculated. Misreporting was defined as follows: participants with an EI/TEE ratio of <0.77 were categorized as low energy reporters, while participants with an EI/TEE ratio >1.28 were categorized as high energy reporters. Participants with an EI/TEE ratio of 0.77–1.28 were categorized as “true” energy reporters. One-year percent weight change prior to EE visit was used as another validation indicator. Participants who were low energy reporters but lost >2% of their body weight were categorized as undereaters. Results: Two hundred ninety-six participants provided both FFQ and DLW measurements. Forty-three percent of participants were low energy reporters; among them, almost 30% lost weight and, therefore, were categorized as undereaters. The undereaters consumed significantly fewer calories. No difference in the frequency of low energy reporting was detected between genders or racial groups. Underreporters had significantly higher body weight than “true” or high reporters. Undereaters tended to have higher body mass index than the underreporters. Conclusions: Undereating is prevalent in the elderly and may be falsely perceived as underreporting. It should be further addressed and characterized in future studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-24
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American College of Nutrition
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2010

Fingerprint

Energy Intake
Energy Metabolism
Weights and Measures
Water
Food
Body Weight
Independent Living
Body Mass Index
Diet
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Misreporting of Energy Intake in the Elderly Using Doubly Labeled Water to Measure Total Energy Expenditure and Weight Change. / for the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study.

In: Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.02.2010, p. 14-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{50ecb781cf3848c785e5f061d905d340,
title = "Misreporting of Energy Intake in the Elderly Using Doubly Labeled Water to Measure Total Energy Expenditure and Weight Change",
abstract = "Background: One of the major problems in dietary assessment is inaccuracy in reporting diet. Objective: To examine the association between self-reported energy intake (EI) by food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and energy expenditure (EE), measured by doubly labeled water (DLW), among older persons. Design: EE was assessed in 298 high-functioning, community-dwelling older adults (70–79 years of age) over a 2-week period using DLW. Dietary intake was assessed using a Block FFQ. The ratio between reported EI and total energy expenditure (TEE) was calculated. Misreporting was defined as follows: participants with an EI/TEE ratio of <0.77 were categorized as low energy reporters, while participants with an EI/TEE ratio >1.28 were categorized as high energy reporters. Participants with an EI/TEE ratio of 0.77–1.28 were categorized as “true” energy reporters. One-year percent weight change prior to EE visit was used as another validation indicator. Participants who were low energy reporters but lost >2{\%} of their body weight were categorized as undereaters. Results: Two hundred ninety-six participants provided both FFQ and DLW measurements. Forty-three percent of participants were low energy reporters; among them, almost 30{\%} lost weight and, therefore, were categorized as undereaters. The undereaters consumed significantly fewer calories. No difference in the frequency of low energy reporting was detected between genders or racial groups. Underreporters had significantly higher body weight than “true” or high reporters. Undereaters tended to have higher body mass index than the underreporters. Conclusions: Undereating is prevalent in the elderly and may be falsely perceived as underreporting. It should be further addressed and characterized in future studies.",
author = "{for the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study} and Shahar, {Danit R.} and Binbing Yu and Houston, {Denise K.} and Kritchevsky, {Stephen B.} and Newman, {Anne B.} and Sellmeyer, {Deborah E.} and Frances Tylavsky and Lee, {Jung Sun} and Harris, {Tamara B.}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/07315724.2010.10719812",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "14--24",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Nutrition",
issn = "0731-5724",
publisher = "American College Of Nutrition",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Misreporting of Energy Intake in the Elderly Using Doubly Labeled Water to Measure Total Energy Expenditure and Weight Change

AU - for the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study

AU - Shahar, Danit R.

AU - Yu, Binbing

AU - Houston, Denise K.

AU - Kritchevsky, Stephen B.

AU - Newman, Anne B.

AU - Sellmeyer, Deborah E.

AU - Tylavsky, Frances

AU - Lee, Jung Sun

AU - Harris, Tamara B.

PY - 2010/2/1

Y1 - 2010/2/1

N2 - Background: One of the major problems in dietary assessment is inaccuracy in reporting diet. Objective: To examine the association between self-reported energy intake (EI) by food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and energy expenditure (EE), measured by doubly labeled water (DLW), among older persons. Design: EE was assessed in 298 high-functioning, community-dwelling older adults (70–79 years of age) over a 2-week period using DLW. Dietary intake was assessed using a Block FFQ. The ratio between reported EI and total energy expenditure (TEE) was calculated. Misreporting was defined as follows: participants with an EI/TEE ratio of <0.77 were categorized as low energy reporters, while participants with an EI/TEE ratio >1.28 were categorized as high energy reporters. Participants with an EI/TEE ratio of 0.77–1.28 were categorized as “true” energy reporters. One-year percent weight change prior to EE visit was used as another validation indicator. Participants who were low energy reporters but lost >2% of their body weight were categorized as undereaters. Results: Two hundred ninety-six participants provided both FFQ and DLW measurements. Forty-three percent of participants were low energy reporters; among them, almost 30% lost weight and, therefore, were categorized as undereaters. The undereaters consumed significantly fewer calories. No difference in the frequency of low energy reporting was detected between genders or racial groups. Underreporters had significantly higher body weight than “true” or high reporters. Undereaters tended to have higher body mass index than the underreporters. Conclusions: Undereating is prevalent in the elderly and may be falsely perceived as underreporting. It should be further addressed and characterized in future studies.

AB - Background: One of the major problems in dietary assessment is inaccuracy in reporting diet. Objective: To examine the association between self-reported energy intake (EI) by food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and energy expenditure (EE), measured by doubly labeled water (DLW), among older persons. Design: EE was assessed in 298 high-functioning, community-dwelling older adults (70–79 years of age) over a 2-week period using DLW. Dietary intake was assessed using a Block FFQ. The ratio between reported EI and total energy expenditure (TEE) was calculated. Misreporting was defined as follows: participants with an EI/TEE ratio of <0.77 were categorized as low energy reporters, while participants with an EI/TEE ratio >1.28 were categorized as high energy reporters. Participants with an EI/TEE ratio of 0.77–1.28 were categorized as “true” energy reporters. One-year percent weight change prior to EE visit was used as another validation indicator. Participants who were low energy reporters but lost >2% of their body weight were categorized as undereaters. Results: Two hundred ninety-six participants provided both FFQ and DLW measurements. Forty-three percent of participants were low energy reporters; among them, almost 30% lost weight and, therefore, were categorized as undereaters. The undereaters consumed significantly fewer calories. No difference in the frequency of low energy reporting was detected between genders or racial groups. Underreporters had significantly higher body weight than “true” or high reporters. Undereaters tended to have higher body mass index than the underreporters. Conclusions: Undereating is prevalent in the elderly and may be falsely perceived as underreporting. It should be further addressed and characterized in future studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956468234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956468234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07315724.2010.10719812

DO - 10.1080/07315724.2010.10719812

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 14

EP - 24

JO - Journal of the American College of Nutrition

JF - Journal of the American College of Nutrition

SN - 0731-5724

IS - 1

ER -