Outpatient percutaneous coronary intervention

Has its time come?

Rami Khouzam, Mohamad Khaled Soufi, Ramy Nakhla, Srihari S. Naidu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the context of the rising health-care costs in the United States and the fact that approximately 1 million percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures are performed in the United States annually with a cost approaching $10 billion, reducing the cost associated with this frequently performed effective procedure has become paramount. Government and insurance-based methods have focused upon appropriate utilization and, in some cases, payment has been denied for procedures deemed inappropriate. While curtailing procedures may sometimes be reasonable, this approach is fraught with trouble, as individualized patient care does not fit neatly into population-based concepts of appropriateness. Therefore, alternative means to minimize expenditures should be entertained. Chief among these is the potential to reduce costs associated with PCI from prolonged inpatient stays for a procedure that, thankfully, has become significantly safer as it has maintained its efficacy. In this position paper, we discuss the theme of same-day discharge versus overnight stay after PCI as a cost-saving strategy, and pinpoint some criteria that can help to guide such a decision while preserving maximal patient safety and both patient and physician satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E167-E169
JournalJournal of Invasive Cardiology
Volume26
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Outpatients
Costs and Cost Analysis
Patient Safety
Health Expenditures
Insurance
Patient Satisfaction
Health Care Costs
Inpatients
Patient Care
Physicians
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Khouzam, R., Soufi, M. K., Nakhla, R., & Naidu, S. S. (2014). Outpatient percutaneous coronary intervention: Has its time come? Journal of Invasive Cardiology, 26(12), E167-E169.

Outpatient percutaneous coronary intervention : Has its time come? / Khouzam, Rami; Soufi, Mohamad Khaled; Nakhla, Ramy; Naidu, Srihari S.

In: Journal of Invasive Cardiology, Vol. 26, No. 12, 01.12.2014, p. E167-E169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Khouzam, R, Soufi, MK, Nakhla, R & Naidu, SS 2014, 'Outpatient percutaneous coronary intervention: Has its time come?', Journal of Invasive Cardiology, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. E167-E169.
Khouzam, Rami ; Soufi, Mohamad Khaled ; Nakhla, Ramy ; Naidu, Srihari S. / Outpatient percutaneous coronary intervention : Has its time come?. In: Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2014 ; Vol. 26, No. 12. pp. E167-E169.
@article{53766586e305476a840c71de1d62ab79,
title = "Outpatient percutaneous coronary intervention: Has its time come?",
abstract = "In the context of the rising health-care costs in the United States and the fact that approximately 1 million percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures are performed in the United States annually with a cost approaching $10 billion, reducing the cost associated with this frequently performed effective procedure has become paramount. Government and insurance-based methods have focused upon appropriate utilization and, in some cases, payment has been denied for procedures deemed inappropriate. While curtailing procedures may sometimes be reasonable, this approach is fraught with trouble, as individualized patient care does not fit neatly into population-based concepts of appropriateness. Therefore, alternative means to minimize expenditures should be entertained. Chief among these is the potential to reduce costs associated with PCI from prolonged inpatient stays for a procedure that, thankfully, has become significantly safer as it has maintained its efficacy. In this position paper, we discuss the theme of same-day discharge versus overnight stay after PCI as a cost-saving strategy, and pinpoint some criteria that can help to guide such a decision while preserving maximal patient safety and both patient and physician satisfaction.",
author = "Rami Khouzam and Soufi, {Mohamad Khaled} and Ramy Nakhla and Naidu, {Srihari S.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "E167--E169",
journal = "Journal of Invasive Cardiology",
issn = "1042-3931",
publisher = "HMP Communications",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outpatient percutaneous coronary intervention

T2 - Has its time come?

AU - Khouzam, Rami

AU - Soufi, Mohamad Khaled

AU - Nakhla, Ramy

AU - Naidu, Srihari S.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - In the context of the rising health-care costs in the United States and the fact that approximately 1 million percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures are performed in the United States annually with a cost approaching $10 billion, reducing the cost associated with this frequently performed effective procedure has become paramount. Government and insurance-based methods have focused upon appropriate utilization and, in some cases, payment has been denied for procedures deemed inappropriate. While curtailing procedures may sometimes be reasonable, this approach is fraught with trouble, as individualized patient care does not fit neatly into population-based concepts of appropriateness. Therefore, alternative means to minimize expenditures should be entertained. Chief among these is the potential to reduce costs associated with PCI from prolonged inpatient stays for a procedure that, thankfully, has become significantly safer as it has maintained its efficacy. In this position paper, we discuss the theme of same-day discharge versus overnight stay after PCI as a cost-saving strategy, and pinpoint some criteria that can help to guide such a decision while preserving maximal patient safety and both patient and physician satisfaction.

AB - In the context of the rising health-care costs in the United States and the fact that approximately 1 million percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures are performed in the United States annually with a cost approaching $10 billion, reducing the cost associated with this frequently performed effective procedure has become paramount. Government and insurance-based methods have focused upon appropriate utilization and, in some cases, payment has been denied for procedures deemed inappropriate. While curtailing procedures may sometimes be reasonable, this approach is fraught with trouble, as individualized patient care does not fit neatly into population-based concepts of appropriateness. Therefore, alternative means to minimize expenditures should be entertained. Chief among these is the potential to reduce costs associated with PCI from prolonged inpatient stays for a procedure that, thankfully, has become significantly safer as it has maintained its efficacy. In this position paper, we discuss the theme of same-day discharge versus overnight stay after PCI as a cost-saving strategy, and pinpoint some criteria that can help to guide such a decision while preserving maximal patient safety and both patient and physician satisfaction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916888234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916888234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - E167-E169

JO - Journal of Invasive Cardiology

JF - Journal of Invasive Cardiology

SN - 1042-3931

IS - 12

ER -