Pediatric hydrocephalus

Systematic literature review and evidence-based guidelines. Part 4: Cerebrospinal fluid shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy for the treatment of hydrocephalus in children

David D. Limbrick, Lissa C. Baird, Paul Klimo, Jay Riva-Cambrin, Ann Marie Flannery

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Object. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the existing literature comparing CSF shunts and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) for the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus and to make evidence-based recommendations regarding the selection of surgical technique for this condition. Methods. Both the US National Library of Medicine and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried using MeSH headings and key words specifically chosen to identify published articles detailing the use of CSF shunts and ETV for the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. Articles meeting specific criteria that had been determined a priori were examined, and data were abstracted and compiled in evidentiary tables. These data were then analyzed by the Pediatric Hydrocephalus Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines Task Force to consider treatment recommendations based on the evidence. Results. Of the 122 articles identified using optimized search parameters, 52 were recalled for full-text review. One additional article, originally not retrieved in the search, was also reviewed. Fourteen articles met all study criteria and contained comparative data on CSF shunts and ETV. In total, 6 articles (1 Class II and 5 Class III) were accepted for inclusion in the evidentiary table; 8 articles were excluded for various reasons. The tabulated evidence supported the evaluation of CSF shunts versus ETV. Conclusions. Cerebrospinal fluid shunts and ETV demonstrated equivalent outcomes in the clinical etiologies studied. RECOMMENDATION: Both CSF shunts and ETV are options in the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: Level II, moderate clinical certainty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-34
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
Volume14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts
Ventriculostomy
Hydrocephalus
Guidelines
Pediatrics
Therapeutics
Medical Subject Headings
National Library of Medicine (U.S.)
Advisory Committees
Databases

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Pediatric hydrocephalus : Systematic literature review and evidence-based guidelines. Part 4: Cerebrospinal fluid shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy for the treatment of hydrocephalus in children. / Limbrick, David D.; Baird, Lissa C.; Klimo, Paul; Riva-Cambrin, Jay; Flannery, Ann Marie.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, Vol. 14, 01.01.2014, p. 30-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{6fc004a78e224e78b2f7c019e3664558,
title = "Pediatric hydrocephalus: Systematic literature review and evidence-based guidelines. Part 4: Cerebrospinal fluid shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy for the treatment of hydrocephalus in children",
abstract = "Object. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the existing literature comparing CSF shunts and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) for the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus and to make evidence-based recommendations regarding the selection of surgical technique for this condition. Methods. Both the US National Library of Medicine and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried using MeSH headings and key words specifically chosen to identify published articles detailing the use of CSF shunts and ETV for the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. Articles meeting specific criteria that had been determined a priori were examined, and data were abstracted and compiled in evidentiary tables. These data were then analyzed by the Pediatric Hydrocephalus Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines Task Force to consider treatment recommendations based on the evidence. Results. Of the 122 articles identified using optimized search parameters, 52 were recalled for full-text review. One additional article, originally not retrieved in the search, was also reviewed. Fourteen articles met all study criteria and contained comparative data on CSF shunts and ETV. In total, 6 articles (1 Class II and 5 Class III) were accepted for inclusion in the evidentiary table; 8 articles were excluded for various reasons. The tabulated evidence supported the evaluation of CSF shunts versus ETV. Conclusions. Cerebrospinal fluid shunts and ETV demonstrated equivalent outcomes in the clinical etiologies studied. RECOMMENDATION: Both CSF shunts and ETV are options in the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: Level II, moderate clinical certainty.",
author = "Limbrick, {David D.} and Baird, {Lissa C.} and Paul Klimo and Jay Riva-Cambrin and Flannery, {Ann Marie}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3171/2014.7.PEDS14324",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "30--34",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics",
issn = "1933-0707",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pediatric hydrocephalus

T2 - Systematic literature review and evidence-based guidelines. Part 4: Cerebrospinal fluid shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy for the treatment of hydrocephalus in children

AU - Limbrick, David D.

AU - Baird, Lissa C.

AU - Klimo, Paul

AU - Riva-Cambrin, Jay

AU - Flannery, Ann Marie

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Object. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the existing literature comparing CSF shunts and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) for the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus and to make evidence-based recommendations regarding the selection of surgical technique for this condition. Methods. Both the US National Library of Medicine and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried using MeSH headings and key words specifically chosen to identify published articles detailing the use of CSF shunts and ETV for the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. Articles meeting specific criteria that had been determined a priori were examined, and data were abstracted and compiled in evidentiary tables. These data were then analyzed by the Pediatric Hydrocephalus Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines Task Force to consider treatment recommendations based on the evidence. Results. Of the 122 articles identified using optimized search parameters, 52 were recalled for full-text review. One additional article, originally not retrieved in the search, was also reviewed. Fourteen articles met all study criteria and contained comparative data on CSF shunts and ETV. In total, 6 articles (1 Class II and 5 Class III) were accepted for inclusion in the evidentiary table; 8 articles were excluded for various reasons. The tabulated evidence supported the evaluation of CSF shunts versus ETV. Conclusions. Cerebrospinal fluid shunts and ETV demonstrated equivalent outcomes in the clinical etiologies studied. RECOMMENDATION: Both CSF shunts and ETV are options in the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: Level II, moderate clinical certainty.

AB - Object. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the existing literature comparing CSF shunts and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) for the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus and to make evidence-based recommendations regarding the selection of surgical technique for this condition. Methods. Both the US National Library of Medicine and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried using MeSH headings and key words specifically chosen to identify published articles detailing the use of CSF shunts and ETV for the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. Articles meeting specific criteria that had been determined a priori were examined, and data were abstracted and compiled in evidentiary tables. These data were then analyzed by the Pediatric Hydrocephalus Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines Task Force to consider treatment recommendations based on the evidence. Results. Of the 122 articles identified using optimized search parameters, 52 were recalled for full-text review. One additional article, originally not retrieved in the search, was also reviewed. Fourteen articles met all study criteria and contained comparative data on CSF shunts and ETV. In total, 6 articles (1 Class II and 5 Class III) were accepted for inclusion in the evidentiary table; 8 articles were excluded for various reasons. The tabulated evidence supported the evaluation of CSF shunts versus ETV. Conclusions. Cerebrospinal fluid shunts and ETV demonstrated equivalent outcomes in the clinical etiologies studied. RECOMMENDATION: Both CSF shunts and ETV are options in the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: Level II, moderate clinical certainty.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939421220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939421220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2014.7.PEDS14324

DO - 10.3171/2014.7.PEDS14324

M3 - Review article

VL - 14

SP - 30

EP - 34

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics

SN - 1933-0707

ER -