Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum

a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature

Sarah D. Kowitt, Katrina R. Ellis, Veronica Carlisle, Nivedita L. Bhushan, Kristin Z. Black, Kaitlyn Brodar, Nicole M. Cranley, Kia L. Davis, Eugenia Eng, Michelle Martin, Jared McGuirt, Rebeccah L. Sokol, Patrick Y. Tang, Anissa I. Vines, Jennifer S. Walker, Edwin B. Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Objective: Evidence suggests peer support (PS) is as an effective strategy for enhancing prevention and control of chronic and infectious diseases, including cancer. This systematic scoping review examines the range and variety of interventions on the use of PS across the cancer care continuum. Method: We used a broad definition of PS to capture a wide-range of interventions and characterize the current status of the field. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL to identify relevant articles published from January 2011 to June 2016. We screened the title and abstracts of 2087 articles, followed by full-text screening of 420 articles, resulting in a final sample of 242 articles of which the most recent 100 articles were reviewed (published June 2014 to May 2016). Results: A number of the recent intervention studies focused on breast cancer (32%, breast cancer only) or multiple cancer sites (23%). Although the interventions spanned all phases of the cancer care continuum, only 2% targeted end-of-life care. Seventy-six percent focused on clinical outcomes (e.g., screening, treatment adherence) and 72% on reducing health disparities. Interventions were primarily phone-based (44%) or delivered in a clinic setting (44%). Only a few studies (22%) described the impact of providing PS on peer supporters. Conclusion: PS appears to be a widely used approach to address needs across the cancer care continuum, with many opportunities to expand its reach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-108
Number of pages12
JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Peer Review
Continuity of Patient Care
Neoplasms
Breast Neoplasms
Terminal Care
PubMed
Communicable Diseases
Chronic Disease
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology

Cite this

Kowitt, S. D., Ellis, K. R., Carlisle, V., Bhushan, N. L., Black, K. Z., Brodar, K., ... Fisher, E. B. (2019). Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature. Supportive Care in Cancer, 27(1), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4479-4

Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum : a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature. / Kowitt, Sarah D.; Ellis, Katrina R.; Carlisle, Veronica; Bhushan, Nivedita L.; Black, Kristin Z.; Brodar, Kaitlyn; Cranley, Nicole M.; Davis, Kia L.; Eng, Eugenia; Martin, Michelle; McGuirt, Jared; Sokol, Rebeccah L.; Tang, Patrick Y.; Vines, Anissa I.; Walker, Jennifer S.; Fisher, Edwin B.

In: Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 97-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Kowitt, SD, Ellis, KR, Carlisle, V, Bhushan, NL, Black, KZ, Brodar, K, Cranley, NM, Davis, KL, Eng, E, Martin, M, McGuirt, J, Sokol, RL, Tang, PY, Vines, AI, Walker, JS & Fisher, EB 2019, 'Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature', Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4479-4
Kowitt, Sarah D. ; Ellis, Katrina R. ; Carlisle, Veronica ; Bhushan, Nivedita L. ; Black, Kristin Z. ; Brodar, Kaitlyn ; Cranley, Nicole M. ; Davis, Kia L. ; Eng, Eugenia ; Martin, Michelle ; McGuirt, Jared ; Sokol, Rebeccah L. ; Tang, Patrick Y. ; Vines, Anissa I. ; Walker, Jennifer S. ; Fisher, Edwin B. / Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum : a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature. In: Supportive Care in Cancer. 2019 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 97-108.
@article{9fe1ac8025b5427e966fdf785d304b84,
title = "Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature",
abstract = "Objective: Evidence suggests peer support (PS) is as an effective strategy for enhancing prevention and control of chronic and infectious diseases, including cancer. This systematic scoping review examines the range and variety of interventions on the use of PS across the cancer care continuum. Method: We used a broad definition of PS to capture a wide-range of interventions and characterize the current status of the field. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL to identify relevant articles published from January 2011 to June 2016. We screened the title and abstracts of 2087 articles, followed by full-text screening of 420 articles, resulting in a final sample of 242 articles of which the most recent 100 articles were reviewed (published June 2014 to May 2016). Results: A number of the recent intervention studies focused on breast cancer (32{\%}, breast cancer only) or multiple cancer sites (23{\%}). Although the interventions spanned all phases of the cancer care continuum, only 2{\%} targeted end-of-life care. Seventy-six percent focused on clinical outcomes (e.g., screening, treatment adherence) and 72{\%} on reducing health disparities. Interventions were primarily phone-based (44{\%}) or delivered in a clinic setting (44{\%}). Only a few studies (22{\%}) described the impact of providing PS on peer supporters. Conclusion: PS appears to be a widely used approach to address needs across the cancer care continuum, with many opportunities to expand its reach.",
author = "Kowitt, {Sarah D.} and Ellis, {Katrina R.} and Veronica Carlisle and Bhushan, {Nivedita L.} and Black, {Kristin Z.} and Kaitlyn Brodar and Cranley, {Nicole M.} and Davis, {Kia L.} and Eugenia Eng and Michelle Martin and Jared McGuirt and Sokol, {Rebeccah L.} and Tang, {Patrick Y.} and Vines, {Anissa I.} and Walker, {Jennifer S.} and Fisher, {Edwin B.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00520-018-4479-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "97--108",
journal = "Supportive Care in Cancer",
issn = "0941-4355",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum

T2 - a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature

AU - Kowitt, Sarah D.

AU - Ellis, Katrina R.

AU - Carlisle, Veronica

AU - Bhushan, Nivedita L.

AU - Black, Kristin Z.

AU - Brodar, Kaitlyn

AU - Cranley, Nicole M.

AU - Davis, Kia L.

AU - Eng, Eugenia

AU - Martin, Michelle

AU - McGuirt, Jared

AU - Sokol, Rebeccah L.

AU - Tang, Patrick Y.

AU - Vines, Anissa I.

AU - Walker, Jennifer S.

AU - Fisher, Edwin B.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: Evidence suggests peer support (PS) is as an effective strategy for enhancing prevention and control of chronic and infectious diseases, including cancer. This systematic scoping review examines the range and variety of interventions on the use of PS across the cancer care continuum. Method: We used a broad definition of PS to capture a wide-range of interventions and characterize the current status of the field. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL to identify relevant articles published from January 2011 to June 2016. We screened the title and abstracts of 2087 articles, followed by full-text screening of 420 articles, resulting in a final sample of 242 articles of which the most recent 100 articles were reviewed (published June 2014 to May 2016). Results: A number of the recent intervention studies focused on breast cancer (32%, breast cancer only) or multiple cancer sites (23%). Although the interventions spanned all phases of the cancer care continuum, only 2% targeted end-of-life care. Seventy-six percent focused on clinical outcomes (e.g., screening, treatment adherence) and 72% on reducing health disparities. Interventions were primarily phone-based (44%) or delivered in a clinic setting (44%). Only a few studies (22%) described the impact of providing PS on peer supporters. Conclusion: PS appears to be a widely used approach to address needs across the cancer care continuum, with many opportunities to expand its reach.

AB - Objective: Evidence suggests peer support (PS) is as an effective strategy for enhancing prevention and control of chronic and infectious diseases, including cancer. This systematic scoping review examines the range and variety of interventions on the use of PS across the cancer care continuum. Method: We used a broad definition of PS to capture a wide-range of interventions and characterize the current status of the field. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL to identify relevant articles published from January 2011 to June 2016. We screened the title and abstracts of 2087 articles, followed by full-text screening of 420 articles, resulting in a final sample of 242 articles of which the most recent 100 articles were reviewed (published June 2014 to May 2016). Results: A number of the recent intervention studies focused on breast cancer (32%, breast cancer only) or multiple cancer sites (23%). Although the interventions spanned all phases of the cancer care continuum, only 2% targeted end-of-life care. Seventy-six percent focused on clinical outcomes (e.g., screening, treatment adherence) and 72% on reducing health disparities. Interventions were primarily phone-based (44%) or delivered in a clinic setting (44%). Only a few studies (22%) described the impact of providing PS on peer supporters. Conclusion: PS appears to be a widely used approach to address needs across the cancer care continuum, with many opportunities to expand its reach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054623284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054623284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00520-018-4479-4

DO - 10.1007/s00520-018-4479-4

M3 - Review article

VL - 27

SP - 97

EP - 108

JO - Supportive Care in Cancer

JF - Supportive Care in Cancer

SN - 0941-4355

IS - 1

ER -