Pilot testing of a patient decision aid for adolescents with severe obesity in US pediatric weight management programs within the compass network

Jaime Moore, Matthew Haemer, Nazrat Mirza, Ying Z. Weatherall, Joan Han, Caren Mangarelli, Mary Jane Hawkins, Stavra Xanthakos, Robert Siegel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a best practice for delivering high-quality, patient-centered care when there are multiple options from which to choose. A patient decision aid (PDA) to promote SDM for the treatment of adolescent severe obesity was piloted among 12-17-year-olds (n = 31) from six pediatric weight management programs within the Childhood Obesity Multi Program Analysis and Study System (COMPASS). Medical providers used a brochure that described indications, risks, and benefits of intensive lifestyle management alone versus bariatric surgery plus lifestyle. Immediately after, patients/families completed a survey. Patient/family perceptions of provider effort to promote understanding of health issues, to listen to what mattered most to them, and to include what mattered most to them in choosing next steps averaged 8.6, 8.8, and 8.7, respectively (0 = no effort, 9 = every effort). Nearly all (96%) reported knowing the risks/benefits of each treatment option and feeling clear about which risks/benefits mattered most to them. Most (93%) reported having enough support/advice to make a choice, and 89% felt sure about what the best choice was. Providers largely found the PDA to be feasible and acceptable. This pilot will guide a more rigorous study to determine the PDA’s effectiveness to support decision-making for adolescent severe obesity treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1776
JournalInternational journal of environmental research and public health
Volume16
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2 2019

Fingerprint

Morbid Obesity
Decision Support Techniques
Pediatric Obesity
Pediatrics
Weights and Measures
Decision Making
Life Style
Patient-Centered Care
Pamphlets
Bariatric Surgery
Practice Guidelines
Emotions
Therapeutics
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Pilot testing of a patient decision aid for adolescents with severe obesity in US pediatric weight management programs within the compass network. / Moore, Jaime; Haemer, Matthew; Mirza, Nazrat; Weatherall, Ying Z.; Han, Joan; Mangarelli, Caren; Hawkins, Mary Jane; Xanthakos, Stavra; Siegel, Robert.

In: International journal of environmental research and public health, Vol. 16, No. 10, 1776, 02.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moore, Jaime ; Haemer, Matthew ; Mirza, Nazrat ; Weatherall, Ying Z. ; Han, Joan ; Mangarelli, Caren ; Hawkins, Mary Jane ; Xanthakos, Stavra ; Siegel, Robert. / Pilot testing of a patient decision aid for adolescents with severe obesity in US pediatric weight management programs within the compass network. In: International journal of environmental research and public health. 2019 ; Vol. 16, No. 10.
@article{754cbe8e33e648008dbdaf5bc7ebfbc4,
title = "Pilot testing of a patient decision aid for adolescents with severe obesity in US pediatric weight management programs within the compass network",
abstract = "Shared decision-making (SDM) is a best practice for delivering high-quality, patient-centered care when there are multiple options from which to choose. A patient decision aid (PDA) to promote SDM for the treatment of adolescent severe obesity was piloted among 12-17-year-olds (n = 31) from six pediatric weight management programs within the Childhood Obesity Multi Program Analysis and Study System (COMPASS). Medical providers used a brochure that described indications, risks, and benefits of intensive lifestyle management alone versus bariatric surgery plus lifestyle. Immediately after, patients/families completed a survey. Patient/family perceptions of provider effort to promote understanding of health issues, to listen to what mattered most to them, and to include what mattered most to them in choosing next steps averaged 8.6, 8.8, and 8.7, respectively (0 = no effort, 9 = every effort). Nearly all (96{\%}) reported knowing the risks/benefits of each treatment option and feeling clear about which risks/benefits mattered most to them. Most (93{\%}) reported having enough support/advice to make a choice, and 89{\%} felt sure about what the best choice was. Providers largely found the PDA to be feasible and acceptable. This pilot will guide a more rigorous study to determine the PDA’s effectiveness to support decision-making for adolescent severe obesity treatment.",
author = "Jaime Moore and Matthew Haemer and Nazrat Mirza and Weatherall, {Ying Z.} and Joan Han and Caren Mangarelli and Hawkins, {Mary Jane} and Stavra Xanthakos and Robert Siegel",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "2",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph16101776",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
issn = "1661-7827",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pilot testing of a patient decision aid for adolescents with severe obesity in US pediatric weight management programs within the compass network

AU - Moore, Jaime

AU - Haemer, Matthew

AU - Mirza, Nazrat

AU - Weatherall, Ying Z.

AU - Han, Joan

AU - Mangarelli, Caren

AU - Hawkins, Mary Jane

AU - Xanthakos, Stavra

AU - Siegel, Robert

PY - 2019/5/2

Y1 - 2019/5/2

N2 - Shared decision-making (SDM) is a best practice for delivering high-quality, patient-centered care when there are multiple options from which to choose. A patient decision aid (PDA) to promote SDM for the treatment of adolescent severe obesity was piloted among 12-17-year-olds (n = 31) from six pediatric weight management programs within the Childhood Obesity Multi Program Analysis and Study System (COMPASS). Medical providers used a brochure that described indications, risks, and benefits of intensive lifestyle management alone versus bariatric surgery plus lifestyle. Immediately after, patients/families completed a survey. Patient/family perceptions of provider effort to promote understanding of health issues, to listen to what mattered most to them, and to include what mattered most to them in choosing next steps averaged 8.6, 8.8, and 8.7, respectively (0 = no effort, 9 = every effort). Nearly all (96%) reported knowing the risks/benefits of each treatment option and feeling clear about which risks/benefits mattered most to them. Most (93%) reported having enough support/advice to make a choice, and 89% felt sure about what the best choice was. Providers largely found the PDA to be feasible and acceptable. This pilot will guide a more rigorous study to determine the PDA’s effectiveness to support decision-making for adolescent severe obesity treatment.

AB - Shared decision-making (SDM) is a best practice for delivering high-quality, patient-centered care when there are multiple options from which to choose. A patient decision aid (PDA) to promote SDM for the treatment of adolescent severe obesity was piloted among 12-17-year-olds (n = 31) from six pediatric weight management programs within the Childhood Obesity Multi Program Analysis and Study System (COMPASS). Medical providers used a brochure that described indications, risks, and benefits of intensive lifestyle management alone versus bariatric surgery plus lifestyle. Immediately after, patients/families completed a survey. Patient/family perceptions of provider effort to promote understanding of health issues, to listen to what mattered most to them, and to include what mattered most to them in choosing next steps averaged 8.6, 8.8, and 8.7, respectively (0 = no effort, 9 = every effort). Nearly all (96%) reported knowing the risks/benefits of each treatment option and feeling clear about which risks/benefits mattered most to them. Most (93%) reported having enough support/advice to make a choice, and 89% felt sure about what the best choice was. Providers largely found the PDA to be feasible and acceptable. This pilot will guide a more rigorous study to determine the PDA’s effectiveness to support decision-making for adolescent severe obesity treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067276972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067276972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph16101776

DO - 10.3390/ijerph16101776

M3 - Article

C2 - 31137491

AN - SCOPUS:85067276972

VL - 16

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1661-7827

IS - 10

M1 - 1776

ER -