Posterior composite Class II restorations

in vitro comparison of preparation designs and restoration techniques

K. J. Donly, T. W. Wild, Mark Jensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate conservative preparation designs for the restoration of Class II lesions with posterior resin composite. Fourteen primary and 14 permanent molars were obtained. Conservative modified MO and DO preparations were placed in half the teeth; conventional MO and DO preparations were placed in the remaining teeth. Randomly, a glass-ionomer liner was placed over the exposed dentin in one preparation of each tooth; a calcium hydroxide liner was placed in the remaining preparations. Posterior resin composite was placed in all teeth, and the teeth were loaded with a 17-kg force. Teeth were thermocycled, stored in 37°C water, then immersed in 50% silver nitrate solution and placed in developer. The teeth were sectioned and photographed. Microleakage was calculated according to the depth of dye penetration, on a 6-degree scale. Results demonstrated the conservative modified restorations and conventional restorations, when glass-ionomer liner was used, to have less marginal microleakage, in both primary and permanent teeth, than their calcium hydroxide counterparts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)88-93
Number of pages6
JournalDental Materials
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

Restoration
Calcium Hydroxide
Tooth
Hydrated lime
Ionomers
Composite Resins
Composite materials
Resins
Silver Nitrate
Glass
Nitrates
Silver
Coloring Agents
Dyes
Tooth Preparation
Deciduous Tooth
Water
Dentin
In Vitro Techniques
glass ionomer

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Posterior composite Class II restorations : in vitro comparison of preparation designs and restoration techniques. / Donly, K. J.; Wild, T. W.; Jensen, Mark.

In: Dental Materials, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.01.1990, p. 88-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{df06dd2b86bb41c78e66f58cb328bd3e,
title = "Posterior composite Class II restorations: in vitro comparison of preparation designs and restoration techniques",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to evaluate conservative preparation designs for the restoration of Class II lesions with posterior resin composite. Fourteen primary and 14 permanent molars were obtained. Conservative modified MO and DO preparations were placed in half the teeth; conventional MO and DO preparations were placed in the remaining teeth. Randomly, a glass-ionomer liner was placed over the exposed dentin in one preparation of each tooth; a calcium hydroxide liner was placed in the remaining preparations. Posterior resin composite was placed in all teeth, and the teeth were loaded with a 17-kg force. Teeth were thermocycled, stored in 37°C water, then immersed in 50{\%} silver nitrate solution and placed in developer. The teeth were sectioned and photographed. Microleakage was calculated according to the depth of dye penetration, on a 6-degree scale. Results demonstrated the conservative modified restorations and conventional restorations, when glass-ionomer liner was used, to have less marginal microleakage, in both primary and permanent teeth, than their calcium hydroxide counterparts.",
author = "Donly, {K. J.} and Wild, {T. W.} and Mark Jensen",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80036-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "88--93",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Posterior composite Class II restorations

T2 - in vitro comparison of preparation designs and restoration techniques

AU - Donly, K. J.

AU - Wild, T. W.

AU - Jensen, Mark

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to evaluate conservative preparation designs for the restoration of Class II lesions with posterior resin composite. Fourteen primary and 14 permanent molars were obtained. Conservative modified MO and DO preparations were placed in half the teeth; conventional MO and DO preparations were placed in the remaining teeth. Randomly, a glass-ionomer liner was placed over the exposed dentin in one preparation of each tooth; a calcium hydroxide liner was placed in the remaining preparations. Posterior resin composite was placed in all teeth, and the teeth were loaded with a 17-kg force. Teeth were thermocycled, stored in 37°C water, then immersed in 50% silver nitrate solution and placed in developer. The teeth were sectioned and photographed. Microleakage was calculated according to the depth of dye penetration, on a 6-degree scale. Results demonstrated the conservative modified restorations and conventional restorations, when glass-ionomer liner was used, to have less marginal microleakage, in both primary and permanent teeth, than their calcium hydroxide counterparts.

AB - The aim of this study was to evaluate conservative preparation designs for the restoration of Class II lesions with posterior resin composite. Fourteen primary and 14 permanent molars were obtained. Conservative modified MO and DO preparations were placed in half the teeth; conventional MO and DO preparations were placed in the remaining teeth. Randomly, a glass-ionomer liner was placed over the exposed dentin in one preparation of each tooth; a calcium hydroxide liner was placed in the remaining preparations. Posterior resin composite was placed in all teeth, and the teeth were loaded with a 17-kg force. Teeth were thermocycled, stored in 37°C water, then immersed in 50% silver nitrate solution and placed in developer. The teeth were sectioned and photographed. Microleakage was calculated according to the depth of dye penetration, on a 6-degree scale. Results demonstrated the conservative modified restorations and conventional restorations, when glass-ionomer liner was used, to have less marginal microleakage, in both primary and permanent teeth, than their calcium hydroxide counterparts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025413144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025413144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80036-3

DO - 10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80036-3

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 88

EP - 93

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 2

ER -